How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Tor is symmetric over a commutative ring
Statement
Assume Dependent Choice (DC). If is commutative and are -modules with the projective resolutions used for Tor supplied, then naturally for every .
Proof
Given: a commutative ring, modules , supplied projective resolutions, and The axiom of dependent choice: a relation in which every element is related to something admits an -indexed chain. The ordinary tensor swap is Symmetry and associativity isomorphisms for tensor products over a commutative ring.
Use the supplied resolution . Over a commutative ring, turning a left module into a right module by preserves module maps, surjections and their lifting diagrams, so it preserves projectivity and exactness. Thus is a projective resolution on either side. The termwise swaps , , are inverse to the opposite swaps. Both differential composites send to , so these are chain maps.
The first complex computes through Tor from a projective resolution of the right module, and the second computes through Tor from a projective resolution of the left module. Taking homology of the chain isomorphism gives the desired isomorphism for these supplied presentations. Only one factor has a nonzero chain degree, so no double-complex sign is inserted in this termwise swap.
Given maps and , DC supplies the comparison maps used in Each resolution-defined Tor construction is covariant in both variables. A comparison and a map commute with the swaps since both composites send to . Homology therefore gives naturality. Independence of lifts follows from the cited covariance proposition, and The Tor balance isomorphism is natural and coherent under a change of resolutions identifies these presentations with The balanced Tor bifunctor coherently. This proves the natural balanced Tor symmetry.
Remarks
The chain isomorphism and its homology isomorphism are choice-free for fixed . DC is used only for the arbitrary comparison maps and resolution-independent natural bifunctor interpretation. This is an upper bound on the choice used by the supplied proof, not a claim that DC is necessary for tensor symmetry.
Depends on
- The balanced Tor bifunctor
- Tor from a projective resolution of the left module
- Tor from a projective resolution of the right module
- Symmetry and associativity isomorphisms for tensor products over a commutative ring
- Each resolution-defined Tor construction is covariant in both variables
- The Tor balance isomorphism is natural and coherent under a change of resolutions
- The axiom of dependent choice: a relation in which every element is related to something admits an $\mathbb{N}$-indexed chain
Used by
- Tor symmetry over a commutative ring Example
- Tor is not symmetric as a typed expression over every noncommutative ring False statement
- local global dimension equals residue field projective dimension Lemma
- regular element reduction preserves minimal resolution Lemma
- The Kunneth cross product is graded commutative under the twist map Proposition
Dependency tree · two levels
31 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Charles A. Weibel, An Introduction to Homological Algebra (standard reference, not scraped)