How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Over a principal ideal domain flatness is equivalent to torsion-freeness
Statement
Over a principal ideal domain , an -module is flat if and only if it is torsion-free.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: a PID and an -module .
Every ideal of the integral domain is principal (Principal ideal domain). Torsion-freeness means and imply (Annihilators, torsion elements and the torsion subset of a module).
Over a commutative ring, flatness is equivalent both to preserving injections under tensoring and to injectivity of , , for every ideal (Flatness is equivalent to preserving injections and to the ideal and finitely generated ideal tests). This agrees with Left and right flat modules over an arbitrary ring.
The isomorphism sends to (The regular module is a tensor unit: and ). Tensoring homomorphisms preserves identities and compositions, hence isomorphisms (Module homomorphisms induce tensor-product homomorphisms functorially).
Proof
Suppose is flat and . Since is a domain, multiplication by is an injection . By [L2], tensoring with preserves this injection. Under [L3] the resulting map is multiplication by on , so implies . Thus is torsion-free.
Conversely, suppose is torsion-free and fix an ideal . If , then , so its map to is injective. If , choose a generator using [L1]. The map , , is bijective by principality and cancellation in the domain, and its inverse is -linear.
By [L3], identifies with . The composite with the ideal multiplication map sends to , so under it is multiplication by . This is injective by torsion-freeness. Since is an isomorphism, the ideal multiplication map is injective.
The ideal test [L2] now proves flat. Only one generator of one fixed ideal was chosen at a time; no choice function on all ideals, and no AC, is used. The zero module is included in both directions.
Depends on
- Principal ideal domain
- Annihilators, torsion elements and the torsion subset of a module
- Left and right flat modules over an arbitrary ring
- Flatness is equivalent to preserving injections and to the ideal and finitely generated ideal tests
- The regular module is a tensor unit: $R\otimes_RN\cong N$ and $M\otimes_RR\cong M$
- Module homomorphisms induce tensor-product homomorphisms functorially
Used by
- A flat family with a nodal special fibre is not smooth at the node Counterexample
- The family xy=t Example
- A root of the uniformizer kills the prime-to-residue-characteristic ramification required in specialization Lemma
- Connected smooth quasiprojective model with proper special fibre is proper Lemma
- Dilatations and defect computation Lemma
- Fibres, pullbacks and degrees of divisors under a finite morphism of curves Lemma
- Projective modification of a proper integral DVR-scheme, unchanged in codimension one when regular Lemma
- Strict henselization of a DVR and smooth sections Lemma
Dependency tree · two levels
20 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Charles A. Weibel, An Introduction to Homological Algebra (standard reference, not scraped)