Alphabeta Math
PropositionStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-06‡ rests on unproved material (inherited)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

‡ Rests on 3 statements not proved in this library, by way of the results it cites. This item cites no such statement directly; it depends on results that do. The unproved premises it inherits are ‡ Cohen's first model: an infinite Dedekind-finite set of reals, ‡ Sierpiński 1947: the generalised continuum hypothesis implies the Axiom of Choice and ‡ The continuum hypothesis and its generalisation are independent of ZFC. Each is recorded with a citation to the literature and is not established here, because the track that would prove it has not yet been developed in this library. Everything else in this proof is proved here.

The Tor balance isomorphism is natural and coherent under a change of resolutions

Statement

The balance isomorphisms for Tor commute with maps of modules and with replacement of either projective resolution.

Proof

Given: comparison maps between two resolutions of M and of N, and the tensor double complexes they induce.

1.1

Each comparison map gives a morphism between the two tensor double complexes, compatible with both augmented edges.

given
2.1

The two edge-to-total quasi-isomorphisms therefore form a commutative square on homology, so the balance isomorphism commutes with the comparison maps.

step 1.1algebra
3.1

Comparison maps are unique up to chain homotopy, and homotopic maps induce the same homology map; successive changes compose coherently.

step 2.1algebra∎

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

13 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources