How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
regular element reduction preserves minimal resolution
Statement
Let be nonzero Noetherian local, let be a nonzero finite module, and let be a nonzerodivisor on both and . Reducing a minimal free resolution of modulo gives a minimal free resolution of over . Moreover , including infinity. For the zero-complex assertion also holds, with both projective dimensions zero.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The objects and hypotheses in the statement. We work with the Axiom of Choice; cited dependent-choice and resolution-existence hypotheses are retained.
finite local modules admit minimal free resolutions: Every finite module over a nonzero Noetherian local ring has an augmented resolution by finite-rank free modules, with for . Such a resolution is called minimal; it need not be bounded. This extends the bounded terminology without changing it.
projective dimension from last nonzero betti number: For a nonzero finite module over a nonzero Noetherian local ring, , allowing infinity. For each integer , if and only if .
The balanced Tor bifunctor: For a right -module , a left -module , and , define to be either for a projective resolution of or for a projective resolution of , identified by the preceding natural balance isomorphism. On maps it uses the homology maps induced by comparison maps; coherence makes this a well-defined covariant bifunctor.
Tor is symmetric over a commutative ring: If is commutative and are -modules, then naturally.
Assuming the Axiom of Choice, Nakayama's lemma: Assume the Axiom of Choice. Let be a commutative ring, let satisfy , and let be a finitely generated left -module. If , then .
Proof
The complex resolves . Tensoring it with has no positive homology since multiplication by is injective on . Balance and symmetry of Tor show that reducing any free resolution of modulo has no positive homology and degree-zero homology .
A minimal degreewise finite resolution exists, and its matrices reduce to entries in . Its finite ranks do not change on reduction to the nonzero local ring . Nakayama gives , so the last-nonzero-Betti criterion identifies both projective dimensions with the same last nonzero rank, or infinity if ranks persist arbitrarily far. For choose the zero complex on both sides.
Depends on
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
22 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Lemma 12.32 and proof of 12.31 Case 2, p.122 (standard reference, not scraped)