How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
residue field splits off reduced maximal ideal
Statement
Let be nonzero Noetherian local and a nonzerodivisor. Over the sequence splits, and . Consequently finite implies finite .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The objects and hypotheses in the statement. We work with the Axiom of Choice; cited dependent-choice and resolution-existence hypotheses are retained.
regular element reduction preserves minimal resolution: Let be nonzero Noetherian local, let be a nonzero finite module, and let be a nonzerodivisor on both and . Reducing a minimal free resolution of modulo gives a minimal free resolution of over . Moreover , including infinity. For the zero-complex assertion also holds, with both projective dimensions zero.
auslander buchsbaum syzygy projective dimension: Let be the initial minimal presentation of a nonzero finite module over a nonzero Noetherian local ring. If , then and .
Projective dimension at most n iff higher Ext vanishes: Assume the Axiom of Dependent Choice. In an abelian category with enough projectives and enough injectives, fix supplied projective and injective resolution data on all objects. Let be an object and . The following are equivalent: 1. ; 2. for every object and every ; 3. for every object .
Proof
The sequence is the quotient sequence for ; kills every term. Multiplication by identifies with because cancellation is valid. Choose a -linear functional on taking the class of to . Composing with gives an -linear retraction onto . Thus the sequence splits.
If is finite, it is positive: projectivity of would split , giving a nontrivial idempotent unless , impossible here. Its first minimal syzygy therefore has finite projective dimension. The element acts injectively on this ideal, so reduction gives finite . Ext is additive on a finite direct sum, and the Ext criterion shows that its summand has finite projective dimension.
Depends on
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
14 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Theorem 12.33 proof, p.123; Jeffries 1.60 (standard reference, not scraped)