How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Projective dimension at most n iff higher Ext vanishes
Statement
Assume the Axiom of Dependent Choice. In an abelian category with enough projectives and enough injectives, fix supplied projective and injective resolution data on all objects. Let be an object and . The following are equivalent:
- ;
- for every object and every ;
- for every object .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The stated category and resolution data, an object , and .
For , projective dimension at most is equivalent to projectivity of the th syzygy (Projective dimension at most n iff the nth syzygy is projective).
First-variable dimension shifting identifies the positive-degree Ext of a syzygy with the corresponding higher Ext of the original object (Ext dimension shifting in the first variable).
Positive Ext out of a projective object vanishes (Positive projective-resolution Ext vanishes on a projective first variable).
Direct summands of projective objects are projective (Projective object characterisations).
Projective-resolution Ext is the cohomology of the associated Hom complex (Ext via a projective resolution of the first variable).
Proof
Assume . If , then is projective and positive Ext vanishes by [L3]. If , [L1] makes the th syzygy projective, and repeated [L2] identifies every with with a positive-degree Ext group out of that syzygy, which vanishes by [L3]. Thus (1) implies (2), and (2) implies (3) by taking .
Conversely, assume (3). For , [L2] gives for every ; for , read here as . To see directly that an object with is projective, take the first stage of a projective resolution and factor as . The map is a cocycle representing the identity of in the usual cokernel description of . By [L5] and the assumed vanishing, for some . Since is epic, , so the sequence splits and [L4] makes projective. Apply this to (or when ), and use [L1] when , to prove .
Depends on
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
18 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Charles A. Weibel, An Introduction to Homological Algebra, Chapters 3–4 (standard reference, not scraped)