How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
The integers have global dimension one
Statement
Assume the Axiom of Choice. Both left and right global dimension of equal .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: An arbitrary abelian group and an integer , under Choice.
The canonical free module on the underlying set of surjects onto by , without Choice (Every module is a quotient of a free module).
Under AC, subgroups of free abelian groups are free (Subgroups of free abelian groups are free) and free modules are projective (Free modules are projective, with the exact choice boundary). The hypothesis is The Axiom of Choice; the former theorem uses well-ordering and simultaneous coordinate lifts, and the latter uses choices of basis preimages.
A projective module lifts every map through every surjection (Projective modules and the lifting property).
Projective dimension is the least possible length of a projective resolution, and is zero exactly for projective objects (Projective dimension of an object). Left and right global dimensions are the separate suprema of these dimensions (Left and right global dimension of a ring).
Proof
Take the canonical surjection and put , . The sequence is exact. Under the stated AC hypothesis, [L2] makes free and both and projective. Hence this is a projective resolution of length at most one, and . No family of resolutions of all groups is selected: this construction applies separately to each .
The group is not projective. Otherwise its identity map would lift through the quotient surjection to a homomorphism with . But , and an integer annihilated by the positive integer is zero. Thus , contradicting for . Consequently [L4] and step 1.1 give , while step 1.1 bounds every projective dimension by one. Therefore the left global dimension is exactly one.
Left and right -modules are both precisely abelian groups with the integer action given by repeated addition and additive inverses. Passing from to preserves the underlying homomorphisms, exact sequences, and lifting diagrams; thus it preserves projectivity and lengths of projective resolutions in both directions. Their two suprema are therefore equal, so the right global dimension is also one.
Remarks
The nonprojectivity argument for is choice-free. AC enters the upper bound through the two explicit suppliers in [L2]. No comparison of unbounded resolutions, Ext calculation, or implication from AC to DC is needed for this proof.
Depends on
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
20 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Charles A. Weibel, An Introduction to Homological Algebra, section 4.1, Example 4.1.4 (standard reference, not scraped)