How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Injective dimension at most n iff higher Ext vanishes
Statement
Assume enough injectives. For an object and , if and only if for every object and every .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: An object , an integer , and enough injectives.
Proof
If , the th cosyzygy is injective. Repeated second-variable shifting from Ext dimension shifting in the second variable reduces every with to positive Ext into that injective cosyzygy, which vanishes by Positive injective-resolution Ext vanishes on an injective second variable.
Conversely, repeated shifting makes vanish for every . The defining injective-dimension convention in Injective dimension of an object and the splitting criterion for the final cosyzygy show it is injective, so the chosen resolution has length at most .
Depends on
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
9 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Charles A. Weibel, An Introduction to Homological Algebra, Chapters 3–4 (standard reference, not scraped)