Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-06
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Ext dimension shifting in the second variable

Statement

Assume the Axiom of Dependent Choice. Let A be abelian with enough projectives and enough injectives, and fix supplied projective and injective resolution data on all its objects. If 0→N→I→ΣN→0 is an injective copresentation, then for q≥1 there are natural isomorphisms Ext⁡q+1(M,N)≅Ext⁡q(M,ΣN); its low-degree part is 0→Hom⁡(M,N)→Hom⁡(M,I)→Hom⁡(M,ΣN)→Ext⁡1(M,N)→0.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The displayed short exact sequence with I injective.

Proof

technique · direct
1.1given

The long exact sequence in the second variable contains Ext⁡q(M,I)→Ext⁡q(M,ΣN)→Ext⁡q+1(M,N)→Ext⁡q+1(M,I).

2.1step 1.1algebra∎

The outer groups vanish for q≥1 because I is injective, so the middle arrow is an isomorphism. At q=0 the same sequence gives exactly the printed low-degree segment.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

11 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources