How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Ext can be computed from any projective resolution of the first variable
Statement
Assume the Axiom of Dependent Choice and the hypotheses of The balanced Ext bifunctor. If is any other supplied projective resolution datum on the same class of objects, then for every and , naturally in and . In particular, the formula computes Ext from any individual projective resolution ; the resulting objectwise isomorphism is canonical on cohomology.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: Dependent Choice, the balanced Ext hypotheses, supplied data , objects , and .
Projective comparison maps lifting any object morphism exist: Projective comparison maps exist.
Two comparison maps lifting the same morphism are chain-homotopic: Projective comparison maps are unique up to chain homotopy.
Resolutions of the same object are homotopy equivalent: Projective resolutions of the same object are homotopy equivalent over that object.
Proof
Choose lifting . A reverse comparison is its homotopy inverse since both composites lift the identity and [F2] compares them with identity chain maps.
Precomposition gives . A homotopy induces the cochain homotopy , with . Thus is a choice-independent isomorphism. Its source is by Ext via a projective resolution of the first variable, hence balanced Ext by The balanced Ext bifunctor.
For , choose lifts and by [F1]. Precomposition defines their cohomology actions independently of the lifts by [F2]. Identities and composition follow because composites lift the object composites. The maps and both lift , so [F2] makes them homotopic. Precomposition and cohomology therefore give the required contravariant naturality square in .
Postcomposition by commutes exactly with precomposition by . This gives naturality in and hence both variables. For a single supplied resolution , steps 1.1–2.1 already give the canonical objectwise isomorphism. No simultaneous class-wide choice of comparison maps is required.
Depends on
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
17 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Charles A. Weibel, An Introduction to Homological Algebra, Chapter 2 (standard reference, not scraped)