How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Ext can be computed from any injective resolution of the second variable
Statement
Assume the Axiom of Dependent Choice and the hypotheses of The balanced Ext bifunctor. If is any other supplied injective resolution datum on the same class of objects, then for every and , naturally in and . In particular, the formula computes Ext from any individual injective resolution ; the resulting objectwise isomorphism is canonical on cohomology.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: Dependent Choice, the balanced Ext hypotheses, supplied data , objects , and .
Comparison maps extending any object morphism exist under Dependent Choice: Injective comparison maps exist.
Two such maps extending the same morphism are homotopic: Injective comparison maps are unique up to cochain homotopy.
The two resolutions of are homotopy equivalent under : Injective resolutions of the same object are homotopy equivalent under that object.
Proof
Choose extending . Its reverse comparison is a homotopy inverse: both composites extend the identity, so [F2] compares them to the identity cochain maps.
Applying carries a homotopy to the homotopy . Hence is an isomorphism independent of . The definition Ext via an injective resolution of the second variable identifies its source with , which The balanced Ext bifunctor identifies with balanced Ext.
For , choose comparison maps and extending . Define their actions on cohomology by postcomposition. Independence follows from [F2]; identity and composition laws follow because comparison composites extend the corresponding object composites. Moreover and both extend , so [F2] makes them homotopic. Applying Hom and cohomology gives precisely the naturality square in .
For , precomposition by commutes exactly with postcomposition by . This proves contravariant naturality in and therefore naturality in both variables. The same construction at a single uses only the individual resolution , proving the final assertion without a global choice of comparison maps.
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
14 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Charles A. Weibel, An Introduction to Homological Algebra, Chapter 2 (standard reference, not scraped)