Alphabeta Math
CorollaryStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck passaudited 2026-09-06 rests on unproved material (inherited)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Rests on 3 statements not proved in this library, by way of the results it cites. This item cites no such statement directly; it depends on results that do. The unproved premises it inherits are Cohen's first model: an infinite Dedekind-finite set of reals, Sierpiński 1947: the generalised continuum hypothesis implies the Axiom of Choice and The continuum hypothesis and its generalisation are independent of ZFC. Each is recorded with a citation to the literature and is not established here, because the track that would prove it has not yet been developed in this library. Everything else in this proof is proved here.

Ext can be computed from any injective resolution of the second variable

Statement

Assume the Axiom of Dependent Choice and the hypotheses of The balanced Ext bifunctor. If J is any other supplied injective resolution datum on the same class of objects, then for every M,N and n0, ExtAn(M,N)HnHom(M,J), naturally in M and N. In particular, the formula computes Ext from any individual injective resolution NJ(N); the resulting objectwise isomorphism is canonical on cohomology.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Dependent Choice, the balanced Ext hypotheses, supplied data I,J, objects M,N, and n0.

[F1]

Comparison maps extending any object morphism exist under Dependent Choice: Injective comparison maps exist.

[F2]

Two such maps extending the same morphism are homotopic: Injective comparison maps are unique up to cochain homotopy.

[F3]

The two resolutions of N are homotopy equivalent under N: Injective resolutions of the same object are homotopy equivalent under that object.

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

Choose aN:I(N)J(N) extending 1N. Its reverse comparison is a homotopy inverse: both composites extend the identity, so [F2] compares them to the identity cochain maps.

F1F2F3choose
2.1

Applying Hom(M,) carries a homotopy ab=dh+hd to the homotopy fhf. Hence HnHom(M,aN) is an isomorphism independent of aN. The definition Ext via an injective resolution of the second variable identifies its source with ExtIn(M,N), which The balanced Ext bifunctor identifies with balanced Ext.

step 1.1F2algebra
3.1

For u:NN, choose comparison maps I(u) and J(u) extending u. Define their actions on cohomology by postcomposition. Independence follows from [F2]; identity and composition laws follow because comparison composites extend the corresponding object composites. Moreover J(u)aN and aNI(u) both extend u, so [F2] makes them homotopic. Applying Hom and cohomology gives precisely the naturality square in N.

F1F2step 2.1construct
4.1

For v:MM, precomposition by v commutes exactly with postcomposition by aN. This proves contravariant naturality in M and therefore naturality in both variables. The same construction at a single N uses only the individual resolution J(N), proving the final assertion without a global choice of comparison maps.

step 2.1step 3.1algebra

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · two levels

14 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources