Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-07
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

positive depth ring has regular minimal generator

Statement

If a nonzero Noetherian local ring (R,m,k) has positive depth, then some xmm2 is a nonzerodivisor. The residue field need not be infinite.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The objects and hypotheses in the statement. We work with the Axiom of Choice; cited dependent-choice and resolution-existence hypotheses are retained.

[F1]

The local depth-zero associated-prime criterion: Let (R,m) be a Noetherian local ring and let M0 be a finite R-module. Then depth(M)=0mAssR(M).

[F2]

Finite modules over Noetherian rings have finitely many associated primes: Let R be a Noetherian commutative ring and let M be a finitely generated left R-module. Then AssR(M) is a finite set.

[F3]

Zero divisors on a module over a Noetherian ring are the union of its associated primes: Let R be a Noetherian commutative ring and let M be a left R-module. Then the set of zero divisors on M is pAssR(M)p. If M is finitely generated, this is a finite union.

[F4]

An ideal contained in a finite union of prime ideals lies in one of them: Let R be a commutative ring, let IR be an ideal, and let p1,,pn be prime ideals with n1. If Ip1pn, then Ipi for some i.

[F5]

Assuming the Axiom of Choice, Nakayama's lemma: Assume the Axiom of Choice. Let R be a commutative ring, let IR satisfy IJ(R), and let M be a finitely generated left R-module. If IM=M, then M=0.

Proof

1.1

The associated primes are finite, none is m, and their union is the set of zero divisors. Discard primes contained in others to obtain an antichain p1,,ps. Prime avoidance chooses am outside their union (if the list is empty this restriction is vacuous). If am2, take x=a.

F1F2F3F4
2.1

If am2, Nakayama and positive depth give mm2; choose bmm2. If b avoids every retained prime take x=b. Otherwise divide them into the nonempty class T containing b and the class U not containing it. For each pU, antichain incomparability and prime avoidance give cpp outside all primes of T. Put c=pUcp, with empty product 1.

F5F4step 1.1
3.1

Then x=b+ac is outside m2, since acm2. At a prime of T, b lies in the prime and ac does not. At a prime of U, ac lies in the prime and b does not. Thus x avoids every associated prime and is a nonzerodivisor. No infinite-field argument was used.

F3step 2.1algebra

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

13 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources