How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
positive depth ring has regular minimal generator
Statement
If a nonzero Noetherian local ring has positive depth, then some is a nonzerodivisor. The residue field need not be infinite.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The objects and hypotheses in the statement. We work with the Axiom of Choice; cited dependent-choice and resolution-existence hypotheses are retained.
The local depth-zero associated-prime criterion: Let be a Noetherian local ring and let be a finite -module. Then
Finite modules over Noetherian rings have finitely many associated primes: Let be a Noetherian commutative ring and let be a finitely generated left -module. Then is a finite set.
Zero divisors on a module over a Noetherian ring are the union of its associated primes: Let be a Noetherian commutative ring and let be a left -module. Then the set of zero divisors on is If is finitely generated, this is a finite union.
An ideal contained in a finite union of prime ideals lies in one of them: Let be a commutative ring, let be an ideal, and let be prime ideals with . If then for some .
Assuming the Axiom of Choice, Nakayama's lemma: Assume the Axiom of Choice. Let be a commutative ring, let satisfy , and let be a finitely generated left -module. If , then .
Proof
The associated primes are finite, none is , and their union is the set of zero divisors. Discard primes contained in others to obtain an antichain . Prime avoidance chooses outside their union (if the list is empty this restriction is vacuous). If , take .
If , Nakayama and positive depth give ; choose . If avoids every retained prime take . Otherwise divide them into the nonempty class containing and the class not containing it. For each , antichain incomparability and prime avoidance give outside all primes of . Put , with empty product .
Then is outside , since . At a prime of , lies in the prime and does not. At a prime of , lies in the prime and does not. Thus avoids every associated prime and is a nonzerodivisor. No infinite-field argument was used.
Depends on
- The local depth-zero associated-prime criterion
- Finite modules over Noetherian rings have finitely many associated primes
- Zero divisors on a module over a Noetherian ring are the union of its associated primes
- An ideal contained in a finite union of prime ideals lies in one of them
- Assuming the Axiom of Choice, Nakayama's lemma
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
13 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Theorem 12.33 proof, p.123; Lemma 5.1 variant (standard reference, not scraped)