How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
A polynomial ring in finitely many indeterminates over an integral domain is an integral domain
Statement
If is an integral domain, then is an integral domain for every , including .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: An integral domain and the iterated polynomial rings and .
The iterated ring satisfies and (Polynomial rings in finitely many commuting indeterminates by iteration).
A one-variable polynomial ring over an integral domain is an integral domain (A polynomial ring over an integral domain is an integral domain).
If a property holds at and passes from to , it holds for every natural number (The principle of mathematical induction).
Proof
The ring is a domain, giving the zero-indeterminate case.
Fix and assume that is a domain.
Under that hypothesis, [L1] and [L2] make a domain; together with the base case, [L3] proves the claim for every .
Depends on
Used by
- For a field F, the ideal (x,y) in F[x,y] is not principal Counterexample
- Monomials, coefficients, degree in each variable and total degree in F[x₁,…,xₙ] Definition
- Localizing (x²,xy)=(x)∩(x,y)² keeps only the matching component Example
- The subring k[x,y,x/y,x/y²,…] of k(x,y) has a strictly ascending chain of principal ideals Example
- A polynomial vanishing at every tuple from an infinite subdomain is the zero polynomial Lemma
- regular local graded surjection has zero kernel Lemma
- Every finite Galois extension of an infinite field has a normal basis Theorem
- If deg_xᵢP<| Sᵢ| for each i and P vanishes on S₁×⋯× Sₙ, then P=0 Theorem
Dependency tree · two levels
10 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Neil Donaldson, Math 120B Notes, Section 22, More general constructions (standard reference, not scraped)