How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
A polynomial ring over an integral domain is an integral domain
Statement
If is an integral domain, then is an integral domain.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: An integral domain .
Polynomial convolution makes a commutative ring and embeds injectively as the constant polynomials (Polynomial convolution makes a commutative ring containing as its constant subring).
The product of two nonzero polynomials over a domain is nonzero (Over an integral domain, degrees add under multiplication of nonzero polynomials).
An integral domain is a commutative ring with distinct zero and one and no zero divisors (Zero divisor, and integral domain: a commutative ring with and no zero divisors).
Proof
By [L1], is a commutative ring and its zero and one are distinct because the constant embedding is injective.
By [L2], two nonzero polynomials have nonzero product, so [L3] applied with step 1.1 makes an integral domain.
Depends on
Used by
- A plane intersection with no common component is nonempty and zero-dimensional Corollary
- A polynomial ring in finitely many indeterminates over an integral domain is an integral domain Corollary
- For a field F, F(t)=Frac(F[t]) is its rational function field; in particular ℝ(t)=Frac(ℝ[t]) Corollary
- For every field F, F[x] is a Euclidean domain with degree as Euclidean function Corollary
- Global functions on geometrically connected and geometrically reduced proper schemes Corollary
- A nonclosed open immersion is not proper Counterexample
- Global generation does not imply very ampleness Counterexample
- Global sections do not determine a sheaf on P1 Counterexample
- Quasi-finite does not imply finite Counterexample
- Quasi-separatedness in pushforward cannot be omitted Counterexample
- The affine line is not proper Counterexample
- Under AC, proper integral finite-type schemes over fields with multiple points are not affine Counterexample
- The degenerate affine Hecke algebra Definition
- The Laurent polynomial ring as the principal localisation of Z[t] at t Definition
- A closed point immersion is unramified Example
- Normalization of a nodal affine plane curve Example
- Normalization of the cusp semigroup ring Example
- Normalization of the t³,t⁴,t⁵ monomial curve Example
- Normalizing the cuspidal plane curve Example
- Normalizing the nodal plane curve Example
- Tensoring the injection k[x] →(· x) k[x] with k[x]/(x) gives the zero map Example
- The punctured affine line as an open finite factorization Example
- The quotient of GL2 by the diagonal torus is the complement of the diagonal in P1 x P1 Example
- The tangent space of the parabola at a general point and the local parameter Example
- Φ₁ through Φ₁₂ computed from the divisor recursion Example
- FALSE: every finitely generated module over a domain is a direct sum of cyclic modules False statement
- A quasi-finite one-generator quotient is locally its integral closure Lemma
- A zero-dimensional projective scheme has finitely many closed points with finite-dimensional local rings Lemma
- Coprime positive-degree plane forms form a regular sequence Lemma
- Every finite-variable polynomial ring over a field is a UFD, with prime irreducibles and principal height-one primes Lemma
- Finite algebras over a strongly transcendental variable are nowhere quasi-finite Lemma
- Finite local length exactly when no common local branch Lemma
- Finite-variable polynomial algebras over fields are integrally closed Lemma
- Fraction-field coefficients of an integral LKB class are Laurent polynomials Lemma
- If p is a prime not dividing n, a rational minimal polynomial of a primitive n-th root of unity also kills its p-th power Lemma
- Polynomial rings over normal domains are normal Lemma
- Prime and local-ring correspondence on standard projective charts Lemma
- The eventual Hilbert function of a zero-dimensional projective quotient equals its total length Lemma
- The fork-noodle pairing is well defined and equivariant Lemma
- The product of primitive integer polynomials is primitive, and contents multiply Lemma
…and 9 more results.
Dependency tree · two levels
11 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Thomas W. Judson, Abstract Algebra: Theory and Applications, Theorem 17.4 (standard reference, not scraped)