Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedSession-authored (Fable 5 assisted)precheck passaudited 2026-08-26
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

If degxiP<Si for each i and P vanishes on S1××Sn, then P=0

Statement

Let F be a field, let PF[x1,,xn], and let finite sets S1,,SnF satisfy

degxiP<Si(1in).

If P vanishes at every point of S1××Sn, then P=0.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: a field F, finite subsets S1,,SnF, and a polynomial PF[x1,,xn] with degxiP<Si for every i, vanishing on S1××Sn.

[F2]

Every polynomial has a finite monomial expansion, so in particular one may write P=j=0dPj(x1,,xn1)xnj with d=degxnP (Monomials, coefficients, degree in each variable and total degree in F[x1,,xn]).

Proof

technique · induction
1.1

[base] If n=1, then P is a univariate polynomial of degree below S1 vanishing at every point of S1. By [F1] a nonzero polynomial of that degree cannot have so many roots, so P=0.

F1
1.2

[ih] Assume the statement is known for polynomials in n1 variables.

given
1.3

Write P=j=0dPj(x1,,xn1)xnj as in [F2], where d=degxnP<Sn.

F2
2.1

Fix (a1,,an1)S1××Sn1. Then the univariate polynomial Q(y):=P(a1,,an1,y) has degree at most d<Sn and vanishes on all of Sn, so [F1] gives Q=0. Therefore every coefficient Pj(a1,,an1) is 0.

F1step 1.3
3.1

Since the point (a1,,an1) was arbitrary, every coefficient polynomial Pj vanishes on S1××Sn1. Its degree in each variable is still below the corresponding Si, so the induction hypothesis gives Pj=0 for every j. Hence P=0.

step 1.2step 2.1discharge-induction

Remarks

  • The inequalities are strict. The companion page's counterexample is exactly the boundary case where equality holds in one variable.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

24 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources