Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedSession-authored (Fable 5 assisted)precheck passjudge pass (deepseek-v4-pro + gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-08-26
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Alon's Combinatorial Nullstellensatz: if degf=iti, the coefficient of x1t1xntn in f is nonzero, and Si>ti, then f(s1,,sn)0 for some siSi

Statement

Let F be a field, let fF[x1,,xn], and let finite sets S1,,SnF. Suppose

  1. degf=iti;
  2. the coefficient of x1t1xntn in f is nonzero; and
  3. Si>ti for every i.

Then there is a point (s1,,sn)S1××Sn with f(s1,,sn)0.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: a field F, a polynomial fF[x1,,xn], finite subsets S1,,SnF, and exponents t1,,tn satisfying the three hypotheses above.

[L1]

The reduction lemma gives a polynomial f~ with degxif~<Si, agreeing with f on the whole grid and preserving the top coefficient of x1t1xntn (Reducing f modulo gi(xi)=sSi(xis) lowers each degxi below Si, preserves the values on the grid, and preserves any top-degree coefficient whose exponents stay below the grid sizes).

[L2]

A polynomial with separate degrees below the grid sizes that vanishes on the whole grid is the zero polynomial (If degxiP<Si for each i and P vanishes on S1××Sn, then P=0).

Proof

technique · contradiction
1.1

Suppose, for contradiction, that f vanishes at every point of S1××Sn. Apply [L1] to obtain the reduced polynomial f~.

assume-contraL1
2.1

By [L1], the polynomial f~ still vanishes on the whole grid and satisfies degxif~<Si for every i, so [L2] gives f~=0.

L1L2step 1.1
3.1

But [L1] also says that the coefficient of x1t1xntn is the same in f~ as in f, hence nonzero. That contradicts f~=0. Therefore some grid point satisfies f(s1,,sn)0.

L1step 2.1discharge-contradiction

Remarks

  • The top-coefficient hypothesis is load-bearing. The companion page carries the false statement obtained by deleting it.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

22 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources