How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Alon's Combinatorial Nullstellensatz: if , the coefficient of in is nonzero, and , then for some
Statement
Let be a field, let , and let finite sets . Suppose
- ;
- the coefficient of in is nonzero; and
- for every .
Then there is a point with .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: a field , a polynomial , finite subsets , and exponents satisfying the three hypotheses above.
The reduction lemma gives a polynomial with , agreeing with on the whole grid and preserving the top coefficient of (Reducing modulo lowers each below , preserves the values on the grid, and preserves any top-degree coefficient whose exponents stay below the grid sizes).
A polynomial with separate degrees below the grid sizes that vanishes on the whole grid is the zero polynomial (If for each and vanishes on , then ).
Proof
Suppose, for contradiction, that vanishes at every point of . Apply [L1] to obtain the reduced polynomial .
By [L1], the polynomial still vanishes on the whole grid and satisfies for every , so [L2] gives .
But [L1] also says that the coefficient of is the same in as in , hence nonzero. That contradicts . Therefore some grid point satisfies .
Remarks
- The top-coefficient hypothesis is load-bearing. The companion page carries the false statement obtained by deleting it.
Depends on
- If $\deg_{x_i}P<\lvert S_i\rvert$ for each $i$ and $P$ vanishes on $S_1\times\cdots\times S_n$, then $P=0$
- Reducing $f$ modulo $g_i(x_i)=\prod_{s\in S_i}(x_i-s)$ lowers each $\deg_{x_i}$ below $\lvert S_i\rvert$, preserves the values on the grid, and preserves any top-degree coefficient whose exponents stay below the grid sizes
- Monomials, coefficients, degree in each variable and total degree in $F[x_1,\dots,x_n]$
- Evaluation and roots of a polynomial in a commutative target ring
- Field
- The cardinality $\lvert A\rvert$ of a finite set
Used by
- Applying the Nullstellensatz by hand to f(x,y)=x²y+xy²+x+y over ℚ Example
- FALSE: if deg f=∑ᵢtᵢ and | Sᵢ|>tᵢ then f is nonzero somewhere on S₁×⋯× Sₙ False statement
- Which field each bound is proved over, and what changes when it is replaced Remark
- Cauchy–Davenport: for p prime and nonempty A,B⊆ℤ/p, | A+B|≥min{p,| A|+| B|-1} Theorem
- Covering {0,1}ⁿ minus the origin by affine hyperplanes avoiding the origin needs at least n of them Theorem
Dependency tree · two levels
22 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- N. Alon, Combinatorial Nullstellensatz, Theorem 1.2 (standard reference, not scraped)