Alphabeta Math
CounterexampleConstruction: Literature-sourcedVerification: AI-adaptedprecheck passjudge pass (deepseek-v4-pro + gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-08-26
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

P(x)=x(x−1) vanishes on {0,1} although deg⁡xP=∣{0,1}∣

Statement refuted

The strict inequality in the polynomial identity lemma cannot be weakened to equality.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: a field F, the polynomial P(x)=x(x−1)∈F[x], and the set S={0,1}⊆F.

[L1]

Over a field, if a polynomial has degree in each variable strictly below the size of the corresponding finite grid set and vanishes on the whole grid, then it is the zero polynomial (If deg⁡xiP<∣Si∣ for each i and P vanishes on S1×⋯×Sn, then P=0).

Counterexample

technique · direct
1.1given

The polynomial P(x)=x(x−1) is nonzero and has degree 2=∣S∣.

2.1step 1.1

Yet P(0)=0 and P(1)=0, so P vanishes on all of S.

3.1L1step 2.1∎

Therefore the conclusion of [L1] fails when the strict inequality is replaced by equality.

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · two levels

17 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources