Alphabeta Math
CounterexampleConstruction: Literature-sourcedVerification: Literature-sourcedprecheck passaudited 2026-08-11
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

For a field F, the ideal (x,y) in F[x,y] is not principal

Statement refuted

If F is a field, then every ideal of F[x,y] is principal.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A field F, the iterated ring F[x,y]=F[x][y], and the ideal I=(x,y) generated by x and y.

[L1]

The bivariate polynomial ring is obtained by adjoining x and then y (Polynomial rings in finitely many commuting indeterminates by iteration).

[L2]

A polynomial ring in finitely many indeterminates over a field is an integral domain (A polynomial ring in finitely many indeterminates over an integral domain is an integral domain).

[L3]

The ideal generated by a set is the smallest ideal containing that set, and (h) denotes the ideal generated by one element h (The ideal generated by a subset and principal ideals).

[L4]

Counterexample

technique · contradiction
1.1

In a commutative ring the multiples of h form an ideal containing h and lie in every ideal containing h, so [L3] identifies (h) with the set of multiples of h. Suppose for contradiction that I=(h); since x,y∈I, the element h divides both. Treating the ring as F[x][y] by [L1], degree in y and the domain property [L2] show from h∣x that h∈F[x].

assume-contragivenL1L2L3algebra
2.1

From h∣y, comparison of the leading coefficient in y gives 1=hc for some c∈F[x], so h is a unit and (h) is the whole ring.

step 1.1L1L2L3algebra
3.1

Evaluation at x=0,y=0 exists by [L4] and has kernel an ideal containing x,y, so [L3] gives I inside that proper kernel; thus I is proper, contradicting step 2.1, and I is not principal.

step 2.1L3L4discharge-contradiction∎

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · two levels

14 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources