How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
The subring of has a strictly ascending chain of principal ideals
Example
Let be a field. Then is an integral domain, so it has a field of fractions (The field of fractions of an integral domain) in which it embeds ( is a field and embeds the integral domain ); write and identify with its image. Inside let
be the smallest subring of containing , , and for every . Then
is a strictly ascending chain of principal ideals of . It never stabilises, so is not Noetherian.
The element belongs to and is what makes each inclusion hold: , , and so on. What makes each inclusion strict is that is not invertible in .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A field , the iterated polynomial ring , and the field with identified with its image. For and the symbol denotes the element of , read as the fraction when .
A field is a set with two operations and distinguished elements in which is an abelian group, multiplication is associative and commutative on all of with , and every has a multiplicative inverse (Field).
An integral domain is a commutative ring with and no zero divisors, that is, in which implies or (Zero divisor, and integral domain: a commutative ring with and no zero divisors).
If is an integral domain, then is an integral domain for every , including (A polynomial ring in finitely many indeterminates over an integral domain is an integral domain).
If is an integral domain then is multiplicative and is the field of fractions of , with elements the fractions () modulo the localisation equivalence (The field of fractions of an integral domain).
For every integral domain the ring is a field, and is an injective unital ring homomorphism ( is a field and embeds the integral domain ).
A subset of a ring is a subring when and is closed under addition, additive inverses and multiplication (Subring: a subset containing and closed under addition, additive inverses and multiplication).
Polynomial rings in finitely many indeterminates are defined by and (Polynomial rings in finitely many commuting indeterminates by iteration).
is the set of finitely supported functions , with coefficientwise addition and convolution product (The polynomial ring over a commutative ring as finitely supported coefficient sequences with convolution).
For , is the intersection of all two-sided ideals containing , so ; is written and is called principal (The ideal generated by a subset and principal ideals).
In a commutative ring, consists of finite sums , and (In a commutative ring, consists of finite sums , and ).
For a commutative ring, being Noetherian is equivalent to every ascending chain of ideals indexed by stabilising (A commutative ring is Noetherian exactly when every ideal is finitely generated, exactly when its ideals satisfy the ascending chain condition, and exactly when every nonempty set of ideals has a maximal member).
Verification
A field is an integral domain: it is a commutative ring with , and if with then . Hence is an integral domain, its field of fractions is a field, and embeds in it.
Let be the intersection of all subrings of containing , , and every with ; this family is nonempty because itself belongs to it, and an intersection of subrings is a subring, so is the smallest such subring.
is the set of -linear combinations of the elements with and , together with the elements with . Call that set . It is a subring: it contains , is visibly closed under addition and additive inverses, and is closed under multiplication because , where as soon as one of is, and where when . It contains the listed generators, since , and . Conversely every element of lies in any subring containing the generators, because with is times , and is when and is the generator when . So .
The elements of , for and , are -linearly independent, and consequently . For the independence, a finite relation becomes, after multiplication by for large enough that every occurring is at least , a relation among distinct monomials of ; a polynomial is a finitely supported family of coefficients, so it vanishes exactly when every coefficient does, and the embedding of is injective, so all . Now , whose index pair has and ; by step 3.1 and the independence just proved, is not among the -linear combinations making up .
For every , and the inclusion is strict. The inclusion holds because and , so the generator of the left ideal lies in the right one. If the two were equal then for some ; multiplying by in the field , which is legitimate because and there, gives , contradicting step 4.1. At this reads .
The chain is an ascending chain of ideals of indexed by with every inclusion strict, so for no index is it constant from onwards. The ascending chain condition fails and is not Noetherian.
Remarks
-
The failure here is a non-terminating factorisation. Splitting off a factor of gives , then , and so on without end, and the ascending chain of principal ideals is the same phenomenon read as ideals. That is a different failure from the one on this page's subalgebra of , where a single ideal needs infinitely many generators while every principal ideal behaves.
-
Dropping from the generating list breaks the example. The quotient of two consecutive generators and is , so without in the ring there is nothing to make the inclusion hold, and the displayed chain is no longer ascending. The published source lists among the generators for exactly this reason.
-
No ideal in the chain is the unit ideal, so is not a field. Each has in the description of step 3.1, and multiplying it by any produces a -combination of elements with ; the element is not one of those, by the independence in step 4.1.
Depends on
- A commutative ring is Noetherian exactly when every ideal is finitely generated, exactly when its ideals satisfy the ascending chain condition, and exactly when every nonempty set of ideals has a maximal member
- The field of fractions $\operatorname{Frac}(D)=(D\setminus\{0\})^{-1}D$ of an integral domain
- $\operatorname{Frac}(D)$ is a field and $d\mapsto d/1$ embeds the integral domain $D$
- A polynomial ring in finitely many indeterminates over an integral domain is an integral domain
- Field
- Zero divisor, and integral domain: a commutative ring with $1 \ne 0$ and no zero divisors
- The ideal generated by a subset and principal ideals
- In a commutative ring, $(S)$ consists of finite sums $\sum r_i s_i$, and $(a)=Ra$
- Subring: a subset containing $1_R$ and closed under addition, additive inverses and multiplication
- Polynomial rings in finitely many commuting indeterminates by iteration
- The polynomial ring over a commutative ring as finitely supported coefficient sequences with convolution
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
32 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- A. Altman and S. Kleiman, A Term of Commutative Algebra, 13th ed., Example (16.6) (standard reference, not scraped)