How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
In a commutative ring, consists of finite sums , and
Statement
In a commutative ring, consists of finite sums , and .
The empty sum is included and equals .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A commutative ring and a subset .
is the intersection of ideals containing (The ideal generated by a subset and principal ideals).
The ideal criterion uses subtraction and absorption (Ideal criteria and intersections of ideals).
Multiplication in a commutative ring commutes (Commutative ring).
Proof
Let be the finite sums ; it contains and is closed under subtraction and multiplication by arbitrary ring elements.
Thus is an ideal containing , while every ideal containing contains each such finite sum.
Hence ; taking gives .
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · next 3 levels
Direct dependencies and their dependencies through the next three levels: 18 results over 14 levels. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, and this result sits at the bottom with a heavier outline. Click the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Janssen and Lindsey, Rings with Inquiry, Ideals (standard reference, not scraped)