Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedprecheck passaudited 2026-08-26
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Every quotient and every localisation of a Noetherian ring is Noetherian

Statement

Let R be a Noetherian commutative ring. Then

  1. R/I is Noetherian for every ideal I of R (The quotient ring R/I with (r+I)(s+I)=rs+I), and
  2. S−1R is Noetherian for every multiplicative subset S⊆R (Multiplicative subsets and the localisation S−1R as equivalence classes of fractions).

Both cases include their degenerate instances: I=R makes R/I the zero ring, and 0∈S makes S−1R the zero ring, and the zero ring is Noetherian.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A Noetherian commutative ring R, an ideal I of R with canonical projection π ⁣:R→R/I, and a multiplicative subset S⊆R with localisation map λS ⁣:R→S−1R.

[L1]

For I⊴R, the maps J↦J/I and K↦π−1(K) are inverse inclusion-preserving bijections between the ideals J of R containing I and the ideals K of R/I (Correspondence theorem: ideals of R/I correspond to ideals of R containing I).

[L2]

The canonical projection R→R/I is a surjective ring homomorphism with kernel I (The canonical projection R→R/I is a surjective ring homomorphism with kernel I).

[L3]

The quotient ring R/I has underlying set the additive cosets of I and multiplication (r+I)(s+I)=rs+I (The quotient ring R/I with (r+I)(s+I)=rs+I).

[L4]

In a commutative ring, (S) consists of finite sums ∑risi, and (a)=Ra; the empty sum is included and equals 0 (In a commutative ring, (S) consists of finite sums ∑risi, and (a)=Ra).

[L5]

For a commutative ring, being Noetherian is equivalent to every ideal being finitely generated (A commutative ring is Noetherian exactly when every ideal is finitely generated, exactly when its ideals satisfy the ascending chain condition, and exactly when every nonempty set of ideals has a maximal member).

[L6]

For an ideal J of S−1R the contraction a=λS−1(J) is an ideal of R, and whenever a=(a1,…,an) one has J=(a1/1,…,an/1) (Every ideal of a localisation is generated by the images of any generating set of its contraction).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1L1L3given

Every ideal of R/I is of the form J/I=π(J) for an ideal J of R containing I, by the correspondence between the ideals of R/I and the ideals of R containing I.

1.2L5given

Since R is Noetherian, every ideal of R is finitely generated; in particular the ideal J of the previous sentence is, and so is the contraction of any ideal of S−1R.

2.1L2L4step 1.1step 1.2

Fix an ideal of R/I and write it as J/I with J=(x1,…,xn), n∈N. Then J/I is generated in R/I by π(x1),…,π(xn): an element of J/I is π(y) with y=∑icixi, so it equals ∑iπ(ci)π(xi); conversely a finite sum ∑icˉiπ(xi) has each cˉi=π(ci) by surjectivity of π, hence equals π(∑icixi)∈π(J). So every ideal of R/I is finitely generated.

2.2L6step 1.2given

Fix an ideal J′ of S−1R and let a=λS−1(J′) be its contraction, an ideal of R. By step 1.2 there are a1,…,an∈R, with n∈N, such that a=(a1,…,an), and then J′=(a1/1,…,an/1). So every ideal of S−1R is finitely generated.

3.1L5step 2.1step 2.2∎

A commutative ring all of whose ideals are finitely generated is Noetherian, so R/I is Noetherian by step 2.1 and S−1R is Noetherian by step 2.2.

Remarks

  • The converse of neither half holds. A quotient or a localisation of a non-Noetherian ring can be Noetherian: the fraction field of a non-Noetherian integral domain is a field, and a field is Noetherian. The theorem is therefore stated in one direction only.

  • Where the Noetherian hypothesis is spent. It is used exactly twice, both times in step 1.2, to produce a finite generating list: once for an ideal of R containing I, and once for the contraction of an ideal of S−1R. Neither half needs the ascending chain condition or the maximal condition, so neither half uses a choice principle beyond what A commutative ring is Noetherian exactly when every ideal is finitely generated, exactly when its ideals satisfy the ascending chain condition, and exactly when every nonempty set of ideals has a maximal member already records.

  • The quotient half uses only surjectivity of the projection. Step 2.1 appeals to no other property of π, so the same argument shows that the image of a finitely generated ideal under any surjective homomorphism of commutative rings is finitely generated.

Depends on

Used by

…and 10 more results.

Dependency tree · two levels

30 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources