Alphabeta Math
ExampleConstruction: Literature-sourcedVerification: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedaudited 2026-10-02
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

The twists on the projective line have degree n

Example

Assume the Axiom of Choice, inherited from the Proj, properness and twisting-sheaf constructions below (The Axiom of Choice). Let k be a field, let X=Pk1 be the projective line over k, and let OX(n), n∈Z, be the twisting sheaves of the canonical model X≅Proj⁡k[x0,x1] (Projective space is Proj of a polynomial ring). Then X is a normal proper curve over k, so the degree of divisors on X descends to the Picard group and defines a group homomorphism deg⁡k:Pic⁡(X)→Z (The degree of a divisor descends to the Picard group of a normal proper curve), and for every integer n, deg⁡k OX(n)  =  n. The computation uses only the twist OX(1) and the group law of Pic⁡(X): it does not assert that every invertible sheaf on X is isomorphic to some OX(n), that is, no classification of the line bundles on Pk1 and no isomorphism Pic⁡(Pk1)≅Z is claimed.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: a field k, the projective line X=Pk1, the polynomial ring S=k[x0,x1] with its total-degree grading deg⁡xi=1, and the Axiom of Choice.

[F1]

Choice. The Axiom of Choice is the statement that every family of nonempty sets has a choice function; it implies the Axiom of Dependent Choice (The Axiom of Choice, The axiom of dependent choice: a relation in which every element is related to something admits an N-indexed chain, AC implies DC implies countable choice).

[F2]

Model and charts. There is a canonical isomorphism of Spec⁡k-schemes Pk1≅Proj⁡S (Projective space is Proj of a polynomial ring). The A-level chart description gives D+(x0)=Spec⁡k[t] with t=x1/x0 and D+(x1)=Spec⁡k[u] with u=x0/x1; these charts cover X, and the transition on D+(x0x1) is t=u−1 by the standard-chart formulas (Relative projective space from standard charts). The standard opens D+(f) for homogeneous f∈S+ of positive degree form a basis of the topology of Proj⁡S (Standard opens of Proj).

[F3]

Twisting sheaves. OX(n)=S(n)~, so that Γ(D+(f),OX(n))=S(n)(f) for homogeneous f∈S+, and OX(0)=OX (Twisting sheaf on Proj). For every n the sheaf OX(n) is invertible and the multiplication maps OX(m)⊗OXOX(n)→OX(m+n) are isomorphisms (Invertible twists for degree-one generated rings). Sections of a sheaf that agree on the members of an open cover glue uniquely (A sheaf on a topological space).

[F4]

The chart rings. k is a field, hence a Noetherian ring, and k[t], k[u] are polynomial algebras over k, hence Noetherian domains and integrally closed; k[u] is even a principal ideal domain (Field, Left and right Noetherian rings, Hilbert basis theorem: if R is Noetherian then R[x] is Noetherian, For every field F, F[x] is a unique factorisation domain, Finite-variable polynomial algebras over fields are integrally closed, For every field F, F[x] is a principal ideal domain). A point of X lies in a chart D+(xi)=Spec⁡A with A=k[t] or A=k[u], and its stalk is the localisation Ap at the corresponding prime, with maximal ideal pAp (The underlying space of an affine spectrum, The stalk of the affine structure sheaf at a prime is A_p, Localisation at a prime ideal: Rp=(R∖p)−1R).

[F5]

Integrality. The zero ideal (0) is a homogeneous prime of S and lies in D+(f) for every nonzero homogeneous f∈S+; since the standard opens form a basis, every nonempty open subset of X contains (0), so any two nonempty open subsets meet and X is irreducible (Standard opens of Proj, Irreducible topological spaces and irreducible subsets in the subspace topology). Every local ring of X is a localisation of the domain k[t] or k[u] of [F4], hence is a domain, so the nilradical ideal sheaf of X vanishes and X is reduced (The reduction of a scheme). As X is nonempty it is therefore an integral scheme (Integral schemes).

[F6]

Noetherian and dimension one. The two charts of [F2] present X as covered by the spectra of the Noetherian rings k[t], k[u], so X is locally Noetherian and quasi-compact, that is, a Noetherian scheme whose underlying space is a Noetherian space (Locally Noetherian and Noetherian schemes, Hilbert basis theorem: if R is Noetherian then R[x] is Noetherian). The rings k[t] and k[u] have dimension one (A polynomial ring in n variables over a field has dimension n), and for a Noetherian space the dimension of a finite open cover is the supremum of the dimensions of its members (Dimension can be computed on an open cover, Chain dimension and the empty-space convention).

[F7]

Normality. The rings k[t] and k[u] are integrally closed domains of [F4]; every prime localisation of an integrally closed domain is integrally closed, and normality of a Noetherian ring is exactly this local condition (A domain is integrally closed if and only if its prime localisations are, equivalently if and only if its maximal localisations are, normal noetherian ring); localisations of Noetherian rings are Noetherian (Every quotient and every localisation of a Noetherian ring is Noetherian). Hence every local ring of X is a normal Noetherian ring, so X is a normal Noetherian scheme (normal noetherian ring, Weil divisor normal noetherian scheme).

[F8]

Proper curve and the descended degree. The structure morphism Pk1→Spec⁡k is proper (Finite-dimensional projective space is proper over every base), hence separated, of finite type and universally closed (Proper morphisms). With [F5] and [F6], X is an integral proper k-scheme of chain dimension one, i.e., a proper curve over k, and X is normal by [F7] (Degree divisor proper curve). Therefore deg⁡k OX(D):=deg⁡kD is a well-defined group homomorphism Pic⁡(X)→Z: the degree deg⁡kD of a divisor D depends only on the isomorphism class of OX(D), and [ OX(D) ]↦deg⁡kD is additive with respect to the tensor product, the group law of Pic⁡(X) (The degree of a divisor descends to the Picard group of a normal proper curve, Picard group of a scheme, Monoid homomorphism and group homomorphism).

[F9]

The divisor of the section x0. The element x0∈S1=S(1)0 defines a global section of OX(1) whose restriction to the chart D+(xi) is the image of x0, and xi generates the S(xi)-module S(1)(xi), so the coefficient of the section in the generator xi is x0/xi: it equals 1 on D+(x0) and u on D+(x1) (Twisting sheaf on Proj, A sheaf on a topological space). A coefficient is a regular section of OD+(xi) exactly when its germs are nonzerodivisors: the constant 1 is a unit and u is a nonzero element of the domain k[u], so x0 is a regular global section of OX(1). The regular-section lemma then supplies an effective Cartier divisor H on X with local-equation datum {(D+(x0),1),(D+(x1),u)}, whose vanishing subscheme ZH has ideal sheaf generated by 1 on D+(x0) and by u on D+(x1), together with a canonical isomorphism OX(H)→OX(1) (A regular global section of an invertible sheaf glues to an effective Cartier divisor, Effective cartier divisor, Invertible sheaf of cartier divisor).

[F10]

The associated cycle. Let D be an effective Cartier divisor on the normal Noetherian scheme X with local equations fi. For every prime divisor Z⊆X with generic point ξ and every chart with ξ∈Ui, the value vξ(fi,ξ) of the normalised valuation of the discrete valuation ring OX,ξ is independent of i and of the datum, and the associated Weil divisor is cyc⁡(D)=∑Zvξ(fi,ξ) [Z] (Cartier divisors on a normal Noetherian scheme give Weil divisors, Order codimension one rational function). Here vξ is normalised by vξ(π)=1 for a uniformiser π, that is, a generator of the maximal ideal, and vξ(w)=0 for units w (Discrete valuations, Discrete valuation rings). The canonical class map Pic⁡(X)→Cl⁡(X) carries [ OX(D) ] to [ cyc⁡(D) ] (The Cartier-to-Weil map respects addition and principal divisors). The local ring k[u](u) is a local principal ideal domain with nonzero maximal ideal (u)k[u](u), hence a discrete valuation ring with uniformiser u (Equivalent characterizations of a DVR, For every field F, F[x] is a principal ideal domain, Localisation at a prime ideal: Rp=(R∖p)−1R).

[F11]

The point at infinity. The prime (u)⊆k[u] is a maximal ideal of the chart D+(x1)=Spec⁡k[u], and the corresponding point x∞ of X has residue field κ(x∞)=k[u]/(u)≅k (The residue field at a point of an affine scheme, A maximal ideal of an affine algebra has finite residue field over the base field). On the proper curve X the divisors are the finite formal sums of closed points and deg⁡k(∑xnx[x])=∑xnx[κ(x):k] (Degree divisor proper curve).

Verification

Proof technique: identify X with Proj⁡k[x0,x1], show that X is a normal proper curve so that degrees descend to Pic⁡(X), compute the Cartier divisor of the section x0 of OX(1) as a single k-rational point of degree one, and propagate this to every twist with the tensor product and the inverse in Pic⁡(X).

1.1F2F3

Setup. Identify X=Pk1 with Proj⁡S by [F2], and write OX(n) for the twisting sheaves of this model. The charts D+(x0)=Spec⁡k[t] and D+(x1)=Spec⁡k[u] cover X, meet in D+(x0x1) with t=u−1, and the standard opens form a basis.

1.2F2F4F5

X is integral. The point (0) lies in every standard open D+(f) with f≠0 homogeneous; since these form a basis, (0) lies in every nonempty open subset, so any two nonempty opens meet and X is irreducible. A local ring of X is a localisation of k[t] or k[u] at a prime, by [F4]; if (a/s)(b/t)=0 in such a localisation, then uab=0 for some u in the multiplicative set, so a=0 or b=0 because k[t] and k[u] are domains: localisations of domains are domains. Hence every local ring is a domain, the nilradical ideal sheaf vanishes, X is reduced, and since X≠∅ it is an integral scheme.

1.3F4F6

X is Noetherian of chain dimension one. The two charts are the spectra of the Noetherian rings k[t], k[u], so X is locally Noetherian and quasi-compact, hence Noetherian, and its underlying space is Noetherian. Since dim⁡k[t]=dim⁡k[u]=1 and the dimension of a Noetherian space is the supremum of the dimensions of the members of a finite open cover, the chain dimension of X is sup⁡{1,1}=1.

1.4F4F7

X is normal. Each local ring is a prime localisation of k[t] or of k[u], which are integrally closed domains; a prime localisation of an integrally closed domain is integrally closed, and it is Noetherian as a localisation of a Noetherian ring. So every local ring is an integrally closed Noetherian domain, i.e., a normal Noetherian ring, and X is normal.

1.5F3F4F9

The section x0 and its effective divisor. On the chart D+(xi) the module S(1)(xi) is generated by xi (every element is a sum of terms a/xim with a∈Sm+1 and a/xim=(a/xim+1)xi), so the local sections of the global element x0 have coefficients 1 on D+(x0) and u on D+(x1); they agree on the overlap because they are the images of the single element x0, so they glue to a global section of the invertible sheaf OX(1). The coefficients are regular: 1 is a unit of k[t] and u is a nonzero element of the domain k[u], so multiplication by their germs is injective on every localisation. By the regular-section lemma there is an effective Cartier divisor H with local-equation datum {(D+(x0),1),(D+(x1),u)}, vanishing subscheme ZH with ideal sheaf (1) on D+(x0) and (u) on D+(x1), and a canonical isomorphism OX(H)≅OX(1).

2.1F8step 1.2step 1.3step 1.4

X is a normal proper curve over k and the degree descends. The structure morphism X→Spec⁡k is proper and of finite type, so with steps 1.2 and 1.3 the scheme X is an integral proper k-scheme of chain dimension one, a proper curve over k; by step 1.4 it is normal. Hence [F8] applies: deg⁡kOX(D):=deg⁡kD is a well-defined group homomorphism Pic⁡(X)→Z, additive in the tensor product, and deg⁡k of the class of OX(D) equals deg⁡kD for every divisor D on X.

2.2F6F11step 1.3step 1.5

The divisor H is the point at infinity. By step 1.5 the local equation of H on the chart D+(x0) is the unit 1, so no point of D+(x0) lies in ZH; on the chart D+(x1) the local equation is u, and V(u) consists of the maximal ideal (u) alone, with residue field k[u]/(u)≅k. Hence ZH={x∞} with κ(x∞)=k, and x∞∉D+(x0). Since x∞ lies in no open subset contained in D+(x0) while a generic point lies in every nonempty open subset, x∞ is not the generic point of X; its closure is an irreducible closed subset different from X, and since X has chain dimension one by step 1.3, every irreducible closed subset other than X is a point, so {x∞} is closed. Hence x∞ is a closed point of the curve X.

3.1F10F11step 1.5step 2.2

The associated cycle of H. Let Z be a prime divisor of X. If Z≠{x∞} and Z meets D+(x0), the local equation 1 of step 1.5 is a unit at the generic point of Z, so its valuation is 0. If Z≠{x∞} and Z meets D+(x1) at a prime different from (u), then u is not in that prime, so u is a unit of the corresponding localisation and the valuation is again 0. Only Z={x∞} contributes: by step 2.2 its generic point is x∞, the local equation on D+(x1) is u, and k[u](u) is a discrete valuation ring with maximal ideal generated by u, so vx∞(u)=1. Therefore cyc⁡(H)=1⋅[x∞], and deg⁡kcyc⁡(H)=[κ(x∞):k]=1.

4.1F8F10step 1.5step 2.1step 3.1

deg⁡kOX(1)=1. By step 2.1 the descent [F8] applies to X, and by step 3.1 the associated cycle of H is [x∞]; since step 1.5 gives OX(H)≅OX(1), the class [ OX(1) ]=[ OX(H) ] in Pic⁡(X) is carried by the canonical class map to [ cyc⁡(H) ]. As deg⁡k of the class of OX(D) equals deg⁡kD for every divisor D and depends only on the class, deg⁡kOX(1)=deg⁡kcyc⁡(H)=1.

5.1F3F8step 2.1step 4.1

All nonnegative twists. For n≥1 the multiplication isomorphisms of [F3] give OX(1)⊗n≅OX(n) by induction, while OX(0)=OX; in Pic⁡(X) the tensor product is the group law, so additivity of the homomorphism deg⁡k provided by step 2.1 gives deg⁡kOX(n)=ndeg⁡kOX(1)=n by step 4.1. For n=0 the identity class [ OX ] has degree 0 because a homomorphism of groups carries the identity to the identity: deg⁡kOX(0)=deg⁡kOX=0.

6.1F3F8step 5.1

All negative twists. Let n<0 and put m=−n>0. The multiplication isomorphism gives OX(n)⊗OXOX(m)≅OX(0)=OX, so in the abelian group Pic⁡(X) the classes satisfy [ OX(n) ]=[ OX(m) ]−1. Since deg⁡k is a group homomorphism and deg⁡kOX(m)=m by step 5.1, deg⁡kOX(n)=−deg⁡kOX(m)=−m=n.

7.1F1F2F3F8F10step 5.1step 6.1∎

Conclusion. Combining steps 5.1 and 6.1, for every integer n the twist satisfies deg⁡kOX(n)=n. The argument used only OX(1), its tensor powers and its inverse in Pic⁡(X); it exhibits no isomorphism of an arbitrary invertible sheaf with a twist, so it claims no classification of line bundles on Pk1. The Axiom of Choice is used exactly through the Proj, properness and twisting-sheaf constructions of [F2], [F3] and [F8] and, via the implication of [F1], through the Dependent Choice hypothesis of the cycle theorem [F10].

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · two levels

199 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources