Alphabeta Math
CorollaryStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedverified 2026-09-24 (gpt-6-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

A polynomial ring in n variables over a field has dimension n

Statement

Let k be a field and let n≥0. Then dim⁡k[x1,…,xn]=n.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A field k and an integer n≥0.

[L1]

Every nonzero finite-type k-domain D is module-finite and hence integral over a polynomial subring B=k[z1,…,zd] (Noether normalisation yields module finiteness over a polynomial subring). Comparable primes in an integral extension with equal contraction are equal (Comparable primes with the same contraction are equal under an integral map).

[L2]

Finite transcendence degree is additive in field towers, so algebraic extensions preserve transcendence degree (Transcendence degree is additive in finite towers).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1L1L2given

Let D be any finite-type k-domain and Q⊊Q′ primes of D. Set E=D/Q, a nonzero finite-type k-domain, and J=Q′/Q, a nonzero prime of E. By [L1], fix a module-finite normalization B=k[z1,…,zd]⊂E. Its fraction field extension is algebraic, so [L2] gives trdeg⁡kFrac⁡(E)=d.

2.1L1step 1.1algebra

By incomparability in [L1], q:=J∩B is nonzero: otherwise (0)⊊J would be comparable primes of E with the same contraction (0) in B. If d=0, then B=k is a field and has no nonzero proper prime, so the assumed strict pair cannot exist. For a strict pair one therefore has d≥1. A nonzero polynomial f∈q gives a nontrivial algebraic relation among the images of z1,…,zd in the domain B/q. Among this finite set of images, take a maximal algebraically independent subset; because the full set is dependent, it has at most d−1 members. Maximality makes each omitted image algebraic over the field generated by the subset. Since all images generate Frac⁡(B/q), this proves trdeg⁡kFrac⁡(B/q)≤d−1.

3.1L2step 1.1step 2.1

The quotient E/J is integral over B/q, hence its fraction field is algebraic over Frac⁡(B/q). By [L2] and step 2.1, trdeg⁡kFrac⁡(D/Q′)≤d−1<d=trdeg⁡kFrac⁡(D/Q). Thus transcendence degree drops at least one along every strict prime inclusion in a finite-type domain.

4.1step 3.1algebra∎

Apply this drop to any strict chain P0⊊⋯⊊Pr in k[x1,…,xn]. The fraction field of the initial quotient is generated by at most n images of variables, so its transcendence degree is at most n; the final transcendence degree is nonnegative. Hence r≤n. For n≥1, the coordinate ideals (0)⊊(x1)⊊⋯⊊(x1,…,xn) are prime and form a chain of length n. When n=0, the sole prime is (0) and both bounds are zero. Therefore dim⁡k[x1,…,xn]=n for every n≥0.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

12 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources