Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedjudge pass (gpt-6.1-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

The Picard group of a point blowup of the projective plane

Statement

Assume the Axiom of Choice (The Axiom of Choice). Let k be a field, let X=Pk2, let p∈X(k) be a k-rational point, let π:X′=Bl⁡pX→X be the blowup (Blowup of a scheme along an ideal sheaf) and let E=π−1(p) be the exceptional curve (Exceptional subscheme of a blowup). Put ℓ:=π∗OX(1)∈Pic⁡(X′). Then Pic⁡(X′)=Zℓ⊕ZE; moreover X′ is an integral smooth projective surface over k and ℓ⋅ℓ=1, ℓ⋅E=0, E⋅E=−1 (The intersection matrix of a point blowup of a regular surface).

Facts & Assumptions

Given: a field k, the projective plane X=Pk2 with its twisting sheaves OX(d), a k-rational point p∈X(k), the blowup π:X′=Bl⁡pX→X with exceptional curve E=π−1(p), and the class ℓ=π∗OX(1).

[F1]

The plane: X is an integral regular projective surface over k of pure dimension two. Its standard charts are the affine planes Spec⁡k[y1,y2] with coordinate rings polynomial domains of dimension two and regular local rings, the charts are Noetherian and form a finite cover, and X is projective over k hence proper (Projective space is Proj of a polynomial ring, Relative projective space from standard charts, A polynomial ring in finitely many indeterminates over an integral domain is an integral domain, A polynomial ring in n variables over a field has dimension n, Dimension can be computed on an open cover, localisation and polynomial extension of regular rings, Integral schemes, Intersection numbers of Cartier divisors on a smooth projective surface, Projective morphisms before Proj, Projective morphisms are proper). As a smooth finite-type k-scheme, X is locally factorial (Regular local rings are unique factorization domains, Locally factorial scheme).

[F2]

Blowup calculus at a k-rational point: the residue degree is r=[κ(p):k]=1; X′ is an integral regular projective surface over k; E is an effective Cartier divisor with E≅Pk1 and OE(E)≅OPk1(−1), so E⋅E=−r=−1; and for all Cartier divisors D,D′ on X one has E⋅π∗D=0 and π∗D⋅π∗D′=D⋅D′ (The intersection matrix of a point blowup of a regular surface, Exceptional subscheme of a blowup, Intersection numbers of Cartier divisors on a smooth projective surface).

[F3]

Cohomology of twists on the plane: H0(X,OX(m)) is the degree-m part of k[x0,x1,x2] for m≥0 and vanishes for m<0; H1(X,OX(m))=0 for every m; H2(X,OX(m))=0 for m>−3 (Global sections of projective twists, Intermediate cohomology of projective twists vanishes, Top cohomology of projective twists). Hence χ(X,OX)=1, χ(X,OX(−1))=0 and χ(X,OX(−2))=0 (Euler characteristic of a coherent sheaf).

[F4]

Lines are effective Cartier divisors with associated sheaf OX(1): a nonzero linear form is a global section of OX(1) (Global sections of projective twists), it is regular on the integral scheme X, and its zero scheme is an effective Cartier divisor L with OX(L)≅OX(1) (A regular global section of an invertible sheaf glues to an effective Cartier divisor, Invertible sheaf of cartier divisor).

[F5]

Total transform: for a reduced effective Cartier divisor C on the regular surface X with a closed point p at which the multiplicity m=mult⁡p(C) is finite and positive, π∗C=C′+mE as effective Cartier divisors, where C′ is the strict transform (Total transform equals strict transform plus multiplicity times the exceptional divisor, Strict transform of a closed subscheme); passage to associated invertible sheaves uses OX′(π∗C)≅π∗OX(C) (Pullback of a Cartier divisor computes the pullback of its line bundle, Pullback of a Cartier divisor).

[F6]

Divisors and classes: a Weil divisor on a Noetherian normal scheme is a finite integral combination of prime divisors, the principal Weil divisor of f∈K(X)× is div⁡W(f)=∑Zord⁡Z(f)[Z], and Cl⁡ is the quotient by principal divisors (Weil divisor normal noetherian scheme, Principal weil divisor and class group, Order codimension one rational function). The order along a prime divisor with generic point ξ is the valuation of the discrete valuation ring OX,ξ, which is a DVR because X is normal and Noetherian (Height-one localizations of normal Noetherian domains are DVRs, Discrete valuations); orders are additive, vanish on units, and a uniformiser has order one.

[F7]

On a locally factorial Noetherian integral scheme, Cartier and Weil divisors agree compatibly with principal divisors, and the canonical map Pic⁡(X)→Cl⁡(X) carrying [OX(D)] to the class of the associated Weil divisor is an isomorphism (Under AC, Cartier and Weil divisors agree on a locally factorial Noetherian integral scheme); the map D↦[OX(D)] induces an isomorphism CaDiv⁡(X)/Prin⁡C(X)→∼Pic⁡(X) (On an integral scheme, Cartier divisors modulo principal divisors compute the Picard group, Invertible sheaf of cartier divisor).

[F8]

Off the centre: π restricts to an isomorphism π−1(X∖{p})→X∖{p} (The blowup is an isomorphism off the center), and π−1(X∖{p})=X′∖E (Exceptional subscheme of a blowup). For a reduced effective Cartier divisor L through p with strict transform m, this identifies m∖E with L∖{p} (Strict transform of a closed subscheme).

[F9]

Standard charts: after a linear change of homogeneous coordinates taking the line L to V(x0), X∖L is the affine chart U0=Spec⁡k[x1/x0,x2/x0]≅A2, a polynomial domain over k (Relative projective space from standard charts, Projective space is Proj of a polynomial ring, A polynomial ring in finitely many indeterminates over an integral domain is an integral domain).

[F10]

In a polynomial ring k[y1,y2] every height-one prime is principal, generated by an irreducible element, and every irreducible element is prime (Every finite-variable polynomial ring over a field is a UFD, with prime irreducibles and principal height-one primes, Unique factorisation domain). Consequently every Weil divisor on Spec⁡k[y1,y2] is principal: a prime divisor is V(g) for an irreducible g, and for a finite combination ∑ini[V(gi)] the rational function ∏igini has divisor ∑ini[V(gi)], because each gi has order one along V(gi) and order zero along the other V(gj) by [F6], [F10].

[F11]

Excision for class groups: if Z is a prime divisor on an integral Noetherian normal scheme X with U=X∖Z, restriction of Weil divisors (closure in X of each prime divisor of U) is surjective with kernel Z[Z], and principal divisors restrict to principal divisors; hence the induced map Cl⁡(X)→Cl⁡(U) is surjective and its kernel is the image of Z[Z] (Weil divisor normal noetherian scheme, Principal weil divisor and class group, Order codimension one rational function). The same statement holds with Z replaced by a union of finitely many prime divisors, with kernel the direct sum of their classes. To verify the class-group kernel, a prime divisor meeting U has the same codimension-one local ring at its generic point on U and on the whole scheme, so restriction preserves its valuation and the divisor of every rational function. Prime divisors of U extend by closure, proving surjectivity. If a divisor restricts to div⁡U(f), use the same f in the common function field and subtract its divisor on the whole scheme; the difference is supported on the removed prime divisors. Conversely those boundary divisors restrict to zero. This proves the asserted exactness.

[F12]

Intersection numbers depend only on the linear equivalence classes (Intersection numbers of Cartier divisors on a smooth projective surface, The surface intersection product is symmetric and bilinear, Cartier divisor); in particular a Cartier divisor linearly equivalent to 0 has zero intersection with every Cartier divisor.

[F13]

A nonzero global section of an invertible sheaf on the integral scheme X is regular with effective Cartier zero scheme (A regular global section of an invertible sheaf glues to an effective Cartier divisor); duals and tensor products of invertible sheaves are invertible and L∨⊗L≅OX (Dual of a line bundle is its tensor inverse, Invertible sheaves).

[F14]

The Axiom of Choice is inherited from the projective-space, blowup and divisor-class suppliers above; all selections below are finite (a line, a point, finitely many prime divisors).

Proof

technique · direct: establish the surface and intersection data of the blowup, reduce $\operatorname{Pic}$ to the class group, exhibit an affine plane as the complement of the two curves $E$ and $m$, and use the excision sequence for class groups and the intersection matrix for injectivity
1.1F2F1F4

Surface properties and intersection numbers of X′. Since p is k-rational, r=1, and [F2] gives: X′ is an integral regular projective surface over k, E is an effective Cartier divisor with E≅Pk1 and E⋅E=−1, and π∗D⋅π∗D′=D⋅D′, E⋅π∗D=0 for all Cartier divisors D,D′ on X. The intersection product on X is defined because X is an integral regular projective surface [F1], so for D=D′ a line on X with class OX(1) this gives ℓ⋅E=0 and ℓ⋅ℓ=OX(1)⋅OX(1).

2.1F8F1step 1.1

Smoothness over k. A change of homogeneous coordinates over k takes the rational point p to [1:0:0]. On the chart x0≠0 put u=x1/x0, v=x2/x0, so the point ideal is (u,v). From the Rees construction of the blowup, the degree-zero rings on the two standard Proj opens are k[u,v,v/u]=k[u,t] with v=ut, and k[u,v,u/v]=k[s,v] with u=sv; these identifications follow inside k(u,v), where u,v/u and u/v,v are algebraically independent. These two affine planes cover the inverse image of this chart. Outside p, [F8] identifies the blowup with the plane; the two other standard plane charts cover that complement together with the preceding opens. After every field extension K/k this same cover has polynomial coordinate rings K[u,t], K[s,v] and the two polynomial plane rings, whose localizations are regular by localisation and polynomial extension of regular rings. Thus the blowup is geometrically regular, hence smooth over k (Smoothness over a field by geometric regularity).

2.2F4F13F3step 1.1

Computation of ℓ2. By [F4] a line L on X is an effective Cartier divisor with OX(L)≅OX(1), so the defining alternating sum gives OX(1)⋅OX(1)=χ(X,OX)−2χ(X,OX(−1))+χ(X,OX(−2))=1−0+0=1, using the twisting dictionary OX(1)∨≅OX(−1), OX(1)∨⊗2≅OX(−2) (Dual of a line bundle is its tensor inverse, [F13]) and [F3]. Hence ℓ⋅ℓ=1 by step 1.1.

2.3F7step 1.1

Picard and class group of X′. The surface X′ is integral and regular by step 1.1, hence locally factorial (Regular local rings are unique factorization domains, Locally factorial scheme) and Noetherian, so [F7] applies: the canonical map Pic⁡(X′)→Cl⁡(X′) is an isomorphism, and in particular every invertible sheaf is OX′(D) for a Cartier divisor D, whose class under the isomorphism is the class of the associated Weil divisor.

2.4F5F4step 1.1

The strict transform of a line through p. Let L be a line through p and let m be its strict transform. The line is reduced (it is isomorphic to Pk1) and its multiplicity at the smooth point p is one, so [F5] gives π∗L=m+E as effective Cartier divisors; passing to associated invertible sheaves and using OX(L)≅OX(1) yields [m]+[E]=ℓ in Pic⁡(X′). The strict transform m is integral: it is the scheme-theoretic closure of the integral curve L∖{p} under the isomorphism [F8]; on each affine chart meeting this curve its closure ring embeds in the curve's function field and is therefore a domain. Its support is the irreducible closure of that curve. Thus m is integral and a nonzero effective Cartier divisor, so it is a prime divisor of X′ (Effective cartier divisor, Weil divisor normal noetherian scheme).

3.1F12step 1.1step 2.2

Injectivity of the parametrisation. Let a,b∈Z with OX′(aℓ+bE)≅OX′. Then aℓ+bE is linearly equivalent to 0, so by [F12] its intersection with every Cartier divisor vanishes; intersecting with ℓ and with E and using symmetry gives 0=(aℓ+bE)⋅ℓ=a(ℓ⋅ℓ)+b(E⋅ℓ)=a,0=(aℓ+bE)⋅E=a(ℓ⋅E)+b(E⋅E)=−b, since ℓ⋅ℓ=1, ℓ⋅E=0 and E⋅E=−1 by steps 1.1 and 2.2. Hence a=b=0.

3.2F8F9step 2.4

The complement of E and m is an affine plane. By [F8], X′∖E≅X∖{p} under π, and this isomorphism carries m∖E onto L∖{p}. Hence X′∖(E∪m)≅X∖L, and by [F9] the latter is the affine chart U0≅A2=Spec⁡k[y1,y2].

4.1F10F7F6step 3.2

The class group of the complement vanishes. Since U≅Spec⁡k[y1,y2] is the spectrum of a polynomial ring over a field, every height-one prime is principal; by [F10] every Weil divisor on U is a principal divisor, so Cl⁡(U)=0 and (by [F7] applied to the locally factorial U, or directly) Pic⁡(U)=0.

5.1F11step 2.4step 2.3step 3.2step 4.1

Excision: Pic⁡(X′) is generated by E and m. The complement of E∪m in X′ is U by step 3.2, and E,m are the only prime divisors of X′ contained in E∪m (they are irreducible curves and distinct, by step 2.4). Applying the excision statement [F11] with the union of the two prime divisors E,m gives an exact sequence Z[E]⊕Z[m]⟶Cl⁡(X′)⟶Cl⁡(U)⟶0. By step 4.1 the group Cl⁡(U) vanishes, so Cl⁡(X′) is generated by the classes of E and m. Transporting along the isomorphism Pic⁡(X′)≅Cl⁡(X′) of step 2.3 and using [m]=ℓ−[E] from step 2.4, the classes of E and ℓ generate Pic⁡(X′).

6.1F14step 1.1step 2.1step 2.2step 2.4step 5.1step 3.1∎

Conclusion. Steps 5.1 and 3.1 show that Z2→Pic⁡(X′), (a,b)↦aℓ+bE, is surjective and injective, an isomorphism; with the surface properties and intersection numbers of steps 1.1, 2.1, 2.2 and 2.4 this is the stated claim. The Axiom of Choice is inherited from the suppliers recorded in [F14]; the constructions use one line, one point and finitely many prime divisors.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

233 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources