Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck pass
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

The intersection matrix of a point blowup of a regular surface

Statement

Assume the Axiom of Choice (The Axiom of Choice). Let k be a field, let X be an integral regular projective surface over k (Intersection numbers of Cartier divisors on a smooth projective surface), let p∈X be a closed point with residue field κ(p) and r:=[κ(p):k], let π:X′=Bl⁡pX→X be the blowup of X at p (Blowup of a scheme along an ideal sheaf) and let E:=π−1(p) be the exceptional curve (Exceptional subscheme of a blowup). Then:

  1. X′ is an integral regular projective surface over k, E is an effective Cartier divisor, E is isomorphic to Pκ(p)1, and OE(E)≅OPκ(p)1(−1); consequently E⋅E=−r.
  2. For all Cartier divisors D,D′ on X (Cartier divisor): E⋅π∗D=0 and π∗D⋅π∗D′=D⋅D′; in particular (π∗D)2=D2.
  3. If C is a reduced effective Cartier divisor on X through p with multiplicity m:=mult⁡p(C)≥1 (Effective cartier divisor) and strict transform C′ (Strict transform of a closed subscheme), then π∗C=C′+mE, C′⋅E=mr and C′⋅C′=C⋅C−m2r. If p∉C then π∗C=C′ and (C′)2=C2.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: a field k, an integral regular projective surface X over k, a closed point p∈X with residue field κ(p) and residue degree r=[κ(p):k], the blowup π:X′=Bl⁡pX→X and the exceptional curve E=π−1(p), and the Axiom of Choice (The Axiom of Choice).

[F1]

Blowup interfaces: X′=Bl⁡IX=Proj⁡XR(I) for the ideal sheaf I of the closed point p, with structural morphism π and relative twists (Blowup of a scheme along an ideal sheaf); E=π−1(p) is the scheme-theoretic inverse image of the center, a closed subscheme with ideal IOX′ (Exceptional subscheme of a blowup); π is an isomorphism over X∖p and E is the complement of that open subscheme (The blowup is an isomorphism off the center); and π is proper and locally H-projective, and globally H-projective as soon as the ideal is generated by finitely many global sections (Blowups of finite type ideals are locally H-projective, and proper).

[F2]

Integrality and regularity of X′: since X is integral and I is a nonzero ideal of finite type, X′ is integral and π is birational (Blowing up a nonzero ideal on an integral scheme is birational); and since X is a regular finite-type k-scheme of pure dimension two and p is a closed point, X′ is regular of pure dimension two, E is an effective Cartier divisor isomorphic to Pκ(p)1, and OE(E)≅OPκ(p)1(−1) (Point blowups of regular surfaces stay regular, with rational exceptional fibre over the residue field); alternatively E≅P(I/I2)=Pκ(p)1 for the regular immersion p↪X (Regular centers have projective-bundle exceptional divisors, The normal bundle of the exceptional curve is O(-1)).

[F3]

Projective embeddings: an ample twist of the coherent point ideal on X is globally generated (Eventual generation of coherent projective twists, Global generation by the evaluation map). The graded algebra ⨁Id⊗L⊗d has the same relative Proj as R(I) for invertible L (Invariance of the blowup under invertible (fractional) rescaling of the ideal). A graded quotient of OX[z0,…,zN] gives a closed subscheme of PXN (Relative Proj of a graded quasi-coherent algebra, Closed subschemes of projective space and saturated ideals). Closed immersions are preserved by base change (Closed immersions are affine quotients and survive base change). The closed point of a finite-type scheme over k has finite residue degree (A maximal ideal of an affine algebra has finite residue field over the base field).

[F4]

Cohomology of line bundles on the exceptional curve: for E≅Pκ(p)1 over κ(p) and an invertible sheaf M on E of degree d over κ(p), χk(E,M)=r(1+d), where r=[κ(p):k]; in particular χk(E,OE)=r, and for OE(E)≅O(−1) of degree −1 one has χk(E,OE(E))=0 and deg⁡E(OE(E))=χk(E,OE(E))−χk(E,OE)=−r (Euler characteristic of line bundles on a projective line over a finite field extension, Degree of an invertible sheaf on a proper one-dimensional scheme).

[F5]

Pushforward and projection formula: π∗OX′=OX and Rqπ∗OX′=0 for every q>0 (Pushforward and vanishing for point blowups on a surface); consequently χ(X′,π∗N)=χ(X,N) for every invertible OX-module N (Projection formula for invertible twists, Euler characteristic of a coherent sheaf).

[F6]

Effective divisors, twists and transforms: for an effective Cartier divisor H on a surface, the sequence 0→N(−H)→N→i∗(N∣H)→0 is exact for invertible N (Effective Cartier divisors give a short exact sequence, Twisting the exact sequence of an effective Cartier divisor); the total transform π∗D of a Cartier divisor is the pullback Cartier divisor with OX′(π∗D)≅π∗OX(D) (Total transform of a Cartier divisor, Pullback of a Cartier divisor, Pullback of a Cartier divisor computes the pullback of its line bundle); and for a reduced effective Cartier divisor C on the regular surface X through p with multiplicity m≥1, the total transform decomposes as π∗C=C′+mE with C′ the strict transform, which is reduced (Total transform equals strict transform plus multiplicity times the exceptional divisor, Strict transform of a closed subscheme, The reduction of a scheme).

[F7]

The intersection product of Intersection numbers of Cartier divisors on a smooth projective surface is symmetric and Z-bilinear on the Picard group of an integral regular projective surface, and the restriction theorem identifies H⋅F=deg⁡H(O(F)∣H) for effective H (The surface intersection product is symmetric and bilinear, Intersection with a curve is the degree of the restriction); degrees, and with them intersection numbers, are additive on the proper curve H (Degree is additive on invertible sheaves over a proper curve).

[F8]

The Axiom of Choice enters through the blowup, sheaf-cohomology, global-generation and Euler-characteristic suppliers above; the points and divisors appearing below are given data.

Proof

1.1F1F2F3

The ideal I of p is a nonzero coherent ideal on the integral regular projective surface X. Thus the blowup is integral, regular and pure of dimension two; E is effective Cartier, isomorphic to Pκ(p)1, with normal line bundle O(−1). The residue degree r is finite. To apply the intersection theory, we also verify absolute projectivity. Choose X↪Pkn and its ample hyperplane bundle H. For some s, I⊗L, L=H⊗s, is globally generated. A finite set of its global sections generates it: choose finitely many sections spanning each of finitely many affine neighborhoods, possible since X is quasi-compact and the sheaf is of finite type.

2.1F3step 1.1

Put S=⨁d≥0Id⊗L⊗d. The preceding sections yield a graded surjection OX[z0,…,zN]→S, since S is generated in degree one. Its relative Proj is canonically X′ by invertible rescaling; the twist need not be an ordinary ideal. Hence X′ is a closed subscheme of PXN. Base change of X↪Pkn embeds the latter as a closed subscheme of PkN×kPkn.

3.1F3F7step 2.1

The product has a closed Segre embedding into Pk(N+1)(n+1)−1: its coordinates are zab=uavb, and the defining equations are all rank-one minors zabzij−zajzib. On D+(zij), these equations identify its coordinate ring with the polynomial ring on zaj/zij (a≠i) and zib/zij (b≠j); all other coordinates are their products. This is exactly the product of the affine charts D+(ui) and D+(vj), and the identifications respect their ratio transitions. They glue to the closed embedding. Thus X′ is projective over k, and all intersection and proper-cohomology hypotheses are satisfied.

4.1F1F4F6F7step 3.1

By the exceptional-curve Euler formula, χk(E,OE)=r and χk(E,OE(E))=0, so its degree over k is −r. Restriction of the intersection product to the effective curve E gives E2=−r. For any Cartier divisor D on X, π∣E factors through Spec⁡κ(p), since the pulled-back point ideal vanishes on E. The restriction of π∗OX(D) is therefore trivial. Its degree is zero, and the restriction formula gives E⋅π∗D=0. This formula allows arbitrary D; only E must be effective.

4.2F5F6F7step 3.1

Pushforward vanishing and the projection formula give χ(X′,π∗N)=χ(X,N) for every invertible N. Pullback respects tensor products and duals. Apply this equality to the four sheaves OX, OX(D)∨, OX(D′)∨, and their tensor product in the defining Euler-characteristic expression for intersection. The result is π∗D⋅π∗D′=D⋅D′, including the self-intersection case.

5.1F1F6F7F8step 4.1step 4.2∎

For the reduced curve through p, the proved point formula gives π∗C=C′+mE. Orthogonality and symmetry imply 0=E⋅C′+mE2, hence C′⋅E=mr. Bilinearity and step 4.2 give C2=(C′+mE)2=(C′)2+2m2r−m2r, so (C′)2=C2−m2r. If p∉C, a local equation is a unit near p; its pullback misses E, and the off-center isomorphism gives π∗C=C′. The same pullback identity yields (C′)2=C2. Choice enters only through the recorded suppliers.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

207 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources