Alphabeta Math
Pipeline-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

✓ 9 results · all verified · 6 also independently AI-judged
Every result on this page is machine-checked by a proof checker and read in full and owner-audited; the judge is an additional, independent cross-model AI review of the proofs. The 3 not AI-judged were verified by owner audit (typically over a confirmed judge false positive), not failures.

Intersection Products on Smooth Projective Surfaces

1 · Prerequisites

2 · Summary

This page develops the numerical intersection product on an integral regular projective surface over a field. It begins with the degree of an invertible sheaf on a proper curve of dimension at most one, defined as the difference of Euler characteristics, and with the two local tools used throughout: the projection formula for a closed immersion and an invertible twist and the invariance of the Euler characteristic of a closed-point skyscraper under an invertible twist. The twisting theorem for an integral proper curve and the resulting additivity of degree on an arbitrary proper curve of dimension at most one are proved by devissage. The alternating-sum definition of the intersection product on an integral regular projective surface, its symmetry and Z-bilinearity on the Picard group, and the identity expressing the intersection with an effective Cartier divisor as the degree of the restricted line bundle are then established; the final item computes the intersection matrix of a point blowup of a regular surface, including the exceptional square −[κ(p):k], the orthogonality and pullback identities, and the strict-transform formulas. The companion examples page works the pairing out on the projective plane and on its point blowup, and records the Cartier and complementary-dimension hypotheses that the construction cannot drop.

3 · Logical flowchart

4 · Definitions, theorems and proofs

DefinitionDefinition: Literature-sourcedProof: Not applicableprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-6.1-sol)Open item page →

Degree of an invertible sheaf on a proper one-dimensional scheme

Definition

Assume the Axiom of Choice, inherited from the Euler-characteristic supplier below (The Axiom of Choice). Let k be a field (Field) and let C be a proper k-scheme (Proper morphisms) whose underlying topological space is Noetherian of dimension at most one (Chain dimension and the empty-space convention, Locally Noetherian and Noetherian schemes). Write χ(−,−) for the Euler characteristic of coherent sheaves on a proper k-scheme (Euler characteristic of a coherent sheaf).

Degree of an invertible sheaf. For an invertible OC-module L (Invertible sheaves) set deg⁡C(L):=χ(C,L)−χ(C,OC)∈Z.

Degree of a finite locally free sheaf. For a locally free OC-module E of finite constant rank n≥0 (Locally free sheaves of finite rank) set deg⁡C(E):=χ(C,E)−n χ(C,OC)∈Z.

Well-definedness and immediate values.

The dimension bound at most one records that the base is a curve: the definition is applied below to proper curves and to effective Cartier divisors on surfaces, and the degree of a curve in the sense of Degree divisor proper curve agrees with it on smooth proper geometrically integral curves by Riemann-Roch in Euler-characteristic form: the degree shift.

LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-6.1-sol)Open item page →

Projection formula for a closed immersion and an invertible sheaf

Statement

Let i:Z→X be a closed immersion of schemes (Closed immersions of schemes), let L be an invertible OX-module (Invertible sheaves) and let G be a quasi-coherent OZ-module (Quasi-coherent module on a scheme). Then the canonical map L⊗OXi∗G⟶i∗(i∗L⊗OZG) is an isomorphism of OX-modules; here i∗ is the direct image (Direct image of a sheaf along a continuous map), i∗ is the pullback of modules (Pullback of a module along a morphism of ringed spaces) and ⊗ is the tensor product of sheaves of modules (Tensor product of sheaves of modules).

If moreover X is locally Noetherian (Locally Noetherian and Noetherian schemes) and G is coherent (Coherent module sheaves), then both sides are coherent OX-modules, and for every q≥0 there is an isomorphism Hq(X,L⊗i∗G)≅Hq(Z,i∗L⊗G); in particular χ(X,L⊗i∗G)=χ(Z,i∗L⊗G) whenever X is proper over a field. The Euler-characteristic and coherence clauses inherit the Axiom of Choice through Closed immersion preserves cohomology and coherent pushforward and Euler characteristic of a coherent sheaf, while the stalkwise isomorphism itself is choice-free beyond the cited sheaf and tensor constructions.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: a closed immersion i:Z→X of schemes, an invertible OX-module L, a quasi-coherent OZ-module G, and the Axiom of Choice (The Axiom of Choice).

[F1]

A closed immersion is a morphism whose underlying map is a homeomorphism onto a closed subset Z⊆X and for which OX→i∗OZ is surjective (Closed immersions of schemes). In particular i−1(U)=U∩Z for every open U⊆X, the assignment U↦U∩Z is a surjection from the open subsets of X onto the open subsets of Z, and the open neighbourhoods U∩Z of a point z∈Z, with U an open neighbourhood of z in X, are cofinal among the open neighbourhoods of z in Z (Topology on a set, open and closed sets, clopen sets, the closed-set axiomatisation, and the coarser/finer comparison).

[F2]

Direct image is precomposition: (i∗F)(U)=F(i−1U) with the evident restrictions, and it is a sheaf when F is (Direct image of a sheaf along a continuous map, Direct image preserves sheaves and objectwise algebraic structure). The stalk at z∈X is the filtered colimit lim→⁡U∋zF(i−1U) over open neighbourhoods U of z (The stalk of a presheaf at a point).

[F3]

Pullback: i∗L=OZ⊗i−1OXi−1L is an OZ-module (Pullback of a module along a morphism of ringed spaces); it is quasi-coherent when L is quasi-coherent (Scheme pullback preserves quasi-coherence), and invertible OX-modules are quasi-coherent (Invertible sheaves, Locally free sheaves of finite rank). For every point z the stalks satisfy (i−1L)z≅Li(z)=Lz and (i−1OX)z≅OX,z (The stalk of an inverse image sheaf is the stalk over the image point); the stalk of a tensor product of O-modules on a ringed space is the tensor product of the stalks over the stalk of the ring (The stalk of a tensor product sheaf is the tensor product of the stalks).

[F4]

Module identifications: for a homomorphism of commutative rings R→S, a right S-module N and a left R-module M there is a natural isomorphism N⊗RM≅N⊗S(S⊗RM) (Change of rings: N⊗RM≅N⊗S(S⊗RM)); tensor products over a commutative ring are associative (Associativity of tensor products for compatible bimodules); and R⊗RN≅N≅N⊗RR for every R-module N (The regular module is a tensor unit: R⊗RN≅N and M⊗RR≅M).

[F5]

A morphism of sheaves on a topological space is an isomorphism if and only if it is bijective on every stalk (A morphism of sheaves is an isomorphism exactly when it is an isomorphism on every stalk).

[F6]

Tensor products of quasi-coherent modules are quasi-coherent (Tensor product preserves quasi-coherence); on a locally Noetherian scheme a quasi-coherent module is coherent if and only if it is of finite type, and coherence is a local condition on the scheme (Coherent sheaves on a locally Noetherian scheme, Coherent module sheaves).

[F7]

Assume AC. For a quasi-coherent OZ-module F and every q≥0 there is a canonical isomorphism Hq(Z,F)≅Hq(X,i∗F); if X is locally Noetherian and F coherent, then i∗F is coherent (Closed immersion preserves cohomology and coherent pushforward, Euler characteristic of a coherent sheaf). The Axiom of Choice is inherited from these suppliers; the change-of-rings identification of [F4] and the stalk computations below make no selection.

Proof

technique · direct; exhibit the canonical map, compute it on stalks, where it is the change-of-rings identification, and conclude by the stalkwise criterion
1.1F1F3

The canonical map. Pullback of modules is left adjoint to pushforward (Pullback of modules is left adjoint to pushforward), so the identity of the OZ-module i∗L corresponds to a canonical OX-linear map λ:L→i∗i∗L. There is also the canonical map i−1L→i∗L=OZ⊗i−1OXi−1L, s↦1⊗s (Pullback of a module along a morphism of ringed spaces). Define, for every open U⊆X, the OX(U)-bilinear map L(U)×(i∗G)(U)⟶(i∗L⊗OZG)(i−1U),(ℓ,s)⟼λ(ℓ)∣i−1U⊗s. These maps are compatible with the restriction maps, so they assemble into a morphism from the tensor presheaf of Tensor product of sheaves of modules to the sheaf i∗(i∗L⊗G), and hence, by the universal property of sheafification, into a morphism of OX-modules Θ:L⊗OXi∗G⟶i∗(i∗L⊗OZG).

1.2F1F2F3

Stalks off Z. Let x∈X∖Z. Since Z is closed, X∖Z is an open neighbourhood of x with i−1(X∖Z)=∅, so in the colimit of [F2] the groups G(i−1U) vanish for all open U⊆X∖Z; as these U are cofinal among the neighbourhoods of x, the stalk (i∗G)x is 0. Hence (L⊗i∗G)x≅Lx⊗(i∗G)x=0 by [F3]. Applying the same argument to the quasi-coherent module i∗L⊗G in place of G gives (i∗(i∗L⊗G))x=0. Thus Θx is a map 0→0, hence bijective.

1.3F1F2F3

Stalks on Z. Let z∈Z. Every open neighbourhood of z in Z has the form U∩Z with U an open neighbourhood of z in X (Closed immersions of schemes), and these are cofinal in the neighbourhood system of z in Z by [F1]; comparing the colimit description [F2] of the stalk of i∗G with the defining colimit of the stalk of G (The stalk of a presheaf at a point) gives a canonical isomorphism (i∗G)z≅Gz, compatible with the OX,z-module structure because the action on Gz factors through OX,z→OZ,z. Similarly (i∗(i∗L⊗G))z≅(i∗L⊗G)z.

2.1F3F4step 1.3

Put R=OX,z and S=OZ,z. By [F3] the source stalk is Lz⊗RGz and the target is (S⊗RLz)⊗SGz. The map sends ℓ⊗g to (1⊗ℓ)⊗g. Its inverse sends (s⊗ℓ)⊗g to ℓ⊗sg: the R-balancing relation in S⊗RLz and the S-balancing relation of the outer tensor both give the same element, so this formula is well defined. The composites are identities, since (s⊗ℓ)⊗g=(1⊗ℓ)⊗sg. Thus Θz is an isomorphism.

3.1F5step 1.2step 2.1

Conclusion of the isomorphism. By step 1.2 the stalk Θx is bijective for every x∈X∖Z, and by step 2.1 it is bijective for every z∈Z; hence Θ is an isomorphism of OX-modules by [F5]. This proves the first clause.

4.1F4F6F7step 3.1

Coherence clause. Assume now that X is locally Noetherian and that G is coherent. Then i∗G is a coherent OX-module by [F7]. The invertible module L is locally free of rank one (Invertible sheaves), so X is covered by open subschemes U with L∣U≅OU; over such U the unit isomorphism of [F4] and the stalk computations of [F3] give (L⊗i∗G)∣U≅(i∗G)∣U. Since coherence is local on X and i∗G is coherent ([F6], [F7]), the sheaf L⊗i∗G is coherent; its isomorphic image i∗(i∗L⊗G) under the isomorphism of step 3.1 is coherent as well.

5.1F7step 3.1step 4.1∎

Cohomology and Euler characteristic. With X locally Noetherian and G coherent, the isomorphism of step 3.1 identifies Hq(X,L⊗i∗G) with Hq(X,i∗(i∗L⊗G)) for every q≥0; the quasi-coherent module i∗L⊗G satisfies Hq(X,i∗(i∗L⊗G))≅Hq(Z,i∗L⊗G) by [F7] and [F6]. Hence Hq(X,L⊗i∗G)≅Hq(Z,i∗L⊗G) for every q≥0. When X is proper over a field, the left side is an alternating sum of finite-dimensional vector spaces (Euler characteristic of a coherent sheaf, step 4.1), so the termwise isomorphic right side gives χ(X,L⊗i∗G)=χ(Z,i∗L⊗G). The Axiom of Choice enters only through the suppliers named in [F7]; steps 1.1--3.1 make no selection.

LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-6.1-sol)Open item page →

Euler characteristic of a closed point, and invariance under an invertible twist

Statement

Assume the Axiom of Choice, inherited from the Euler-characteristic supplier (The Axiom of Choice). Let k be a field (Field), let X be a proper k-scheme, let p∈X be a closed point with residue field κ(p) (The residue field at a point of an affine scheme) and let i:Spec⁡κ(p)→X be the corresponding closed immersion (Closed immersions of schemes); write κ(p) also for the structure sheaf of Spec⁡κ(p). Then κ(p) is a coherent OX-module via i∗ (Direct image of a sheaf along a continuous map, Coherent module sheaves), and for every invertible OX-module L (Invertible sheaves):

  1. Hq(X,i∗κ(p))=0 for every q≥1 and χ(X,i∗κ(p))=[κ(p):k], a finite integer (Euler characteristic of a coherent sheaf, The degree [K:F]=dim⁡FK of a finite field extension);
  2. i∗L is isomorphic to OSpec⁡κ(p) and there is an isomorphism L⊗OXi∗κ(p)≅i∗κ(p); consequently χ(X,L⊗i∗κ(p))=χ(X,i∗κ(p))=[κ(p):k].

Facts & Assumptions

Given: a field k, a proper k-scheme X, a closed point p∈X with residue field κ(p), the corresponding closed immersion i:Spec⁡κ(p)→X, an invertible OX-module L, and the Axiom of Choice (The Axiom of Choice).

[F1]

Closed immersions: i is a closed immersion precisely when its underlying map is a homeomorphism onto a closed subset and OX→i∗OZ is surjective (Closed immersions of schemes). The scheme Z:=Spec⁡κ(p) has exactly one point q, so its only open subsets are ∅ and Z (Topology on a set, open and closed sets, clopen sets, the closed-set axiomatisation, and the coarser/finer comparison); the stalk of any sheaf F on Z at q is therefore lim→⁡U∋qF(U)=F(Z), since Z is the only neighbourhood of q (The stalk of a presheaf at a point). The structure sheaf satisfies OZ(Z)=κ(p), so OZ is the one-point sheaf with value κ(p), written κ(p) (The localization construction extends to the structure sheaf on Spec A, The residue field at a point of an affine scheme).

[F2]

Properness of X over k gives finite type, so every affine chart of X is a spectrum of a Noetherian ring and X is locally Noetherian (Locally Noetherian and Noetherian schemes); on a locally Noetherian scheme a quasi-coherent module is coherent if and only if it is of finite type, and Z, being the spectrum of a field, is locally Noetherian (Coherent sheaves on a locally Noetherian scheme, Coherent module sheaves). The structure sheaf OZ=κ(p) is finite type and quasi-coherent, hence coherent on Z; consequently i∗κ(p) is coherent on X whenever X is locally Noetherian (Closed immersion preserves cohomology and coherent pushforward).

[F3]

Residue degrees: the closed point p lies in an affine open U=Spec⁡A⊆X with A a finite-type k-algebra, and corresponds to a maximal ideal m⊆A with κ(p)≅A/m; by A maximal ideal of an affine algebra has finite residue field over the base field the residue field κ(p) is a finite extension of k, so the degree [κ(p):k]=dim⁡kκ(p) of The degree [K:F]=dim⁡FK of a finite field extension is a finite integer.

[F4]

Pushforward cohomology and vanishing: for the quasi-coherent OZ-module κ(p) there are isomorphisms Hq(Z,κ(p))≅Hq(X,i∗κ(p)) for every q≥0 (Closed immersion preserves cohomology and coherent pushforward). The space Z is a one-point Noetherian space of dimension 0 (Chain dimension and the empty-space convention), so Hq(Z,F)=0 for every sheaf of abelian groups F on Z and every q>0 (Grothendieck vanishing on a Noetherian space); and H0(Z,κ(p))≅Γ(Z,κ(p))=OZ(Z)=κ(p) (Degree-zero sheaf cohomology is global sections, [F1]).

[F5]

Stalks of pullback: for the morphism i and the point q∈Z one has (i−1L)q≅Li(q)=Lp and (i−1OX)q≅OX,p (The stalk of an inverse image sheaf is the stalk over the image point); the pullback i∗L=OZ⊗i−1OXi−1L (Pullback of a module along a morphism of ringed spaces) therefore has stalk (i∗L)q≅OZ,q⊗OX,pLp (The stalk of a tensor product sheaf is the tensor product of the stalks). Since L is invertible, Lp≅OX,p (Invertible sheaves; Locally free sheaves of finite rank), and OZ,q⊗OX,pOX,p≅OZ,q=κ(p) (The regular module is a tensor unit: R⊗RN≅N and M⊗RR≅M); hence (i∗L)(Z)=(i∗L)q≅κ(p)=OZ(Z) by [F1].

[F6]

Projection formula: for the closed immersion i, the invertible module L and the quasi-coherent OZ-module κ(p), the canonical map L⊗i∗κ(p)→i∗(i∗L⊗OZκ(p)) is an isomorphism, and Hq(X,L⊗i∗κ(p))≅Hq(Z,i∗L⊗κ(p)) for every q≥0 (Projection formula for a closed immersion and an invertible sheaf); moreover i∗L⊗OZκ(p)≅OZ⊗OZκ(p)≅κ(p) once i∗L≅OZ ([F5], The regular module is a tensor unit: R⊗RN≅N and M⊗RR≅M).

[F7]

The Axiom of Choice is inherited from the Euler-characteristic, closed-immersion and pushforward suppliers cited in [F2]–[F6]; the computations below make no selection.

Proof

technique · direct; identify $Z$ and its sheaves, compute the cohomology of $i_*\kappa(p)$, trivialise the pullback of $\mathcal L$, and apply the projection formula
1.1F1F2given

Set-up. The morphism i:Spec⁡κ(p)→X is a closed immersion with image the closed point p, so i is a homeomorphism onto {p}; the scheme Z=Spec⁡κ(p) has one point q, its structure sheaf is the one-point sheaf κ(p), and the stalk of any sheaf on Z at q is its group of global sections. Since X is proper over k, it is of finite type over the field k, hence locally Noetherian.

1.2F2

Coherence. The structure sheaf OZ=κ(p) is a finite-type quasi-coherent OZ-module, so it is coherent on the locally Noetherian Z; the pushforward i∗κ(p) is then a coherent OX-module.

1.3F3

Finite residue degree. The closed point p corresponds to a maximal ideal of a finite-type k-algebra, so κ(p) is a finite extension of k and [κ(p):k]=dim⁡kκ(p) is a finite integer.

1.4F4

Cohomology of i∗κ(p). For every q≥0 there is an isomorphism Hq(X,i∗κ(p))≅Hq(Z,κ(p)); the cohomology of κ(p) on the one-point space Z vanishes in positive degrees, and H0(Z,κ(p))≅κ(p). Hence Hq(X,i∗κ(p))=0 for q≥1 and H0(X,i∗κ(p))≅κ(p).

1.5F1F5

The pullback of L is trivial. The stalk of i∗L at the unique point q is OZ,q⊗OX,pLp≅κ(p), and this is also the group of global sections: (i∗L)(Z)=(i∗L)q≅κ(p)=OZ(Z). A morphism of sheaves i∗L→OZ on the one-point space Z is determined by its component on global sections, so a κ(p)-linear isomorphism κ(p)→κ(p) extends to a morphism of OZ-modules i∗L→OZ whose stalk at q is an isomorphism; by the stalkwise criterion this morphism is an isomorphism, so i∗L≅OSpec⁡κ(p).

2.1F4step 1.4step 1.3

Part (1). The Euler characteristic of the coherent module i∗κ(p) on the proper k-scheme X is the finite alternating sum ∑q≥0(−1)qdim⁡kHq(X,i∗κ(p)); by step 1.4 only q=0 contributes, with H0≅κ(p), so χ(X,i∗κ(p))=dim⁡kκ(p)=[κ(p):k] by step 1.3.

2.2F6step 1.5

Part (2). By the projection formula the canonical map L⊗i∗κ(p)→i∗(i∗L⊗OZκ(p)) is an isomorphism; substituting the isomorphism i∗L≅OZ of step 1.5 and the unit isomorphism OZ⊗OZκ(p)≅κ(p) identifies the target with i∗κ(p). Hence L⊗i∗κ(p)≅i∗κ(p).

3.1F6step 2.2step 2.1

Consequence for the Euler characteristic. The isomorphism of step 2.2 induces isomorphisms Hq(X,L⊗i∗κ(p))≅Hq(X,i∗κ(p)) for every q≥0, so the two alternating sums agree: χ(X,L⊗i∗κ(p))=χ(X,i∗κ(p))=[κ(p):k] by step 2.1.

4.1F7step 1.4step 2.1step 2.2step 3.1∎

Conclusion and choice accounting. Steps 1.4 and 2.1 give statement (1), steps 1.5 and 2.2 give the two isomorphism clauses of statement (2), and step 3.1 gives its Euler-characteristic consequence. The Axiom of Choice is used only through the suppliers recorded in [F7]: the Euler-characteristic and pushforward technology of [F2] and [F4], the closed-immersion and projection-formula machinery of [F6], and the residue-field finiteness of [F3]; the point p, the sheaf L and the morphism i are part of the given data, and no selection is made in steps 1.1–3.1.

LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedprecheck passOpen item page →

Twisting a coherent sheaf by an invertible sheaf on an integral proper curve

Statement

Assume the Axiom of Choice (The Axiom of Choice). Let k be a field (Field) and let X be an integral (Integral schemes) proper k-scheme (Proper morphisms) whose underlying topological space has dimension one (Chain dimension and the empty-space convention). Let L be an invertible OX-module (Invertible sheaves) and let F be a coherent OX-module (Coherent module sheaves); let ξ be the generic point of X and let r:=dim⁡κ(ξ)Fξ be the rank of F at ξ. Then χ(X,L⊗OXF)=r⋅deg⁡X(L)+χ(X,F), with deg⁡X as in Degree of an invertible sheaf on a proper one-dimensional scheme and χ the Euler characteristic of Euler characteristic of a coherent sheaf.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: a field k, an integral proper k-scheme X of dimension one, an invertible OX-module L, a coherent OX-module F, the generic point ξ of X, and the Axiom of Choice (The Axiom of Choice).

[F1]

Set-up: since X is proper over the field k it is of finite type over k, and its affine charts are spectra of Noetherian rings, so X is locally Noetherian and quasi-compact, hence Noetherian (Proper morphisms, Locally Noetherian and Noetherian schemes, Every algebra of finite type over a Noetherian ring is a Noetherian ring). On the locally Noetherian scheme X a quasi-coherent module is coherent if and only if it is of finite type (Coherent sheaves on a locally Noetherian scheme, Coherent module sheaves), and χ(X,G) is defined for every coherent G (Euler characteristic of a coherent sheaf).

[F2]

Generic point and rank: because X is integral it has a unique generic point ξ, and κ(ξ)=OX,ξ is its function field; the stalk of a coherent module at ξ is a finite-dimensional κ(ξ)-vector space, so r=dim⁡κ(ξ)Fξ is a finite integer (Integral schemes, Chain dimension and the empty-space convention). The degree is defined by deg⁡X(L)=χ(X,L)−χ(X,OX) (Degree of an invertible sheaf on a proper one-dimensional scheme).

[F3]

Exactness of twisting: an invertible module is locally free of rank one (Invertible sheaves, Locally free sheaves of finite rank), and tensoring with a locally free module is exact: exactness of a sequence of sheaves is stalkwise (A sequence of abelian sheaves is exact exactly when it is exact on every stalk), at each point the stalk of L is free of rank one, and tensoring modules over a ring by a free module preserves kernels and cokernels. Tensor products of quasi-coherent modules are quasi-coherent (Tensor product preserves quasi-coherence), and the tensor product of an invertible module with a coherent module is coherent: the question is local, and on an affine open trivialising L the unit isomorphism of The regular module is a tensor unit: R⊗RN≅N and M⊗RR≅M identifies L⊗G with G for a coherent G, while coherence is a local condition (Coherent module sheaves, Coherent sheaves on a locally Noetherian scheme).

[L1]

Euler characteristic is additive in short exact sequences of coherent modules on the proper k-scheme X: χ(X,F)=χ(X,F′)+χ(X,F′′) (Euler characteristic is additive in short exact sequences).

[L2]

For a short exact sequence 0→F′→F→F′′→0 of coherent sheaves, the stalk sequence at ξ is a short exact sequence of κ(ξ)-vector spaces (A sequence of abelian sheaves is exact exactly when it is exact on every stalk, Localisation of modules is exact), and dimension is additive on short exact sequences (Rank-nullity: dim⁡FV=nullity⁡T+rank⁡T); hence r(F)=r(F′)+r(F′′).

[L3]

Noetherian devissage (Noetherian devissage for coherent proper pushforward): let P be a property of coherent OX-modules which holds for the zero module and satisfies the two-of-three property in every short exact sequence of coherent modules. Suppose that for every integral closed subscheme Z⊆X with generic point η there is a coherent OX-module G with Supp⁡(G)⊆Z, whose stalk Gη is annihilated by mη and is one-dimensional over κ(η), and for which P(G) holds. Then P holds for every coherent OX-module.

[L4]

The closed points: for a closed point p∈X the canonical morphism i:Spec⁡κ(p)→X is a closed immersion, i∗κ(p) is a coherent OX-module with support {p}, and L⊗i∗κ(p)≅i∗κ(p); moreover χ(X,i∗κ(p))=[κ(p):k] (Euler characteristic of a closed point, and invariance under an invertible twist, Support of a module sheaf).

[L5]

The integral closed subschemes of the one-dimensional Noetherian space X are X itself and the closed points: a proper irreducible closed subset of the integral one-dimensional Noetherian scheme X has dimension zero (otherwise a length-one chain inside it extends to a length-two chain in X), and an integral zero-dimensional scheme consists of its single generic point, which is then closed (Chain dimension and the empty-space convention, Integral schemes).

[L6]

The Axiom of Choice enters through the Euler-characteristic, additivity and devissage suppliers [L1]–[L4]; the tensor and stalk computations below make no selection.

Proof

technique · devissage on the Noetherian scheme $X$ for the property $P(\mathcal G)$: "$\chi(X,\mathcal L\otimes\mathcal G)=r(\mathcal G)\deg_X(\mathcal L)+\chi(X,\mathcal G)$"
1.1F1F2F3

The property P and its defect. For a coherent OX-module G define P(G) to be the identity χ(X,L⊗G)=r(G)deg⁡X(L)+χ(X,G), and define the defect D(G):=χ(X,L⊗G)−r(G)deg⁡X(L)−χ(X,G), so that P(G) holds exactly when D(G)=0. The tensor products and stalks appearing are coherent and finite-dimensional by [F1]–[F3].

1.2F3L1L2

Additivity of the defect. Let 0→F′→F→F′′→0 be a short exact sequence of coherent OX-modules. Tensoring with L preserves exactness by [F3], so 0→L⊗F′→L⊗F→L⊗F′′→0 is short exact with coherent terms, and χ(X,L⊗F)=χ(X,L⊗F′)+χ(X,L⊗F′′) by [L1]; likewise χ(X,F)=χ(X,F′)+χ(X,F′′); and r(F)=r(F′)+r(F′′) by [L2]. Subtracting the last two identities from the first gives D(F)=D(F′)+D(F′′). In particular, if two of D(F′),D(F),D(F′′) vanish then so does the third, and D(0)=0 because the zero sheaf has zero cohomology and zero rank.

1.3L5

The integral closed subschemes. By [L5] every integral closed subscheme Z⊆X is either X itself or a closed point {p}; in the first case the generic point of Z is ξ itself, and in the second case the generic point of Z is p, with residue field κ(p).

2.1F2step 1.1

Witness on X. Take G=OX: it is coherent, its support is X, its stalk at the generic point is κ(ξ) (so its generic stalk is annihilated by the maximal ideal mξ⊆OX,ξ and has dimension one over κ(ξ)), and P(OX) holds because r(OX)=1 and χ(X,L⊗OX)=χ(X,L)=1⋅deg⁡X(L)+χ(X,OX) by the definition of deg⁡X.

2.2L4step 1.1

Witness on a closed point. Let p be a closed point and take G=i∗κ(p) as in [L4]. It is coherent, its support is {p}⊆{p}, its stalk at the generic point p of the closed subscheme is κ(p) (annihilated by the maximal ideal mp and one-dimensional over κ(p)), and P(i∗κ(p)) is the identity χ(X,L⊗i∗κ(p))=χ(X,i∗κ(p)), which holds by the twist-invariance clause of [L4].

3.1L3step 1.2step 1.3step 2.1step 2.2

Devissage. By steps 1.2–2.2 the property P satisfies all hypotheses of [L3]: it holds for 0, it has the two-of-three property, and it holds on every integral closed subscheme of X (witnesses OX for X itself and i∗κ(p) for each closed point p). Therefore P holds for every coherent OX-module, in particular for the given F: χ(X,L⊗F)=r⋅deg⁡X(L)+χ(X,F), which is the asserted identity.

4.1F2step 3.1

Consequence for invertible twists. If F is itself invertible with generic rank r=1, the identity reads χ(X,L⊗F)=deg⁡X(L)+χ(X,F), whence deg⁡X(L⊗F)=deg⁡X(L)+deg⁡X(F); this will be used through the additivity theorem on curves.

5.1L6step 3.1step 4.1∎

Choice accounting and conclusion. Step 3.1 proves the displayed identity for arbitrary coherent F and step 4.1 records the rank-one case. The Axiom of Choice enters exactly through the suppliers recorded in [L6]: the Euler-characteristic and additivity technology [L1], the stalk and dimension additivity [L2], the devissage lemma [L3] and the closed-point twist invariance [L4]; the scheme, the sheaf L and the point ξ are given, and steps 1.1–4.1 make no selection.

CorollaryStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-6.1-sol)Open item page →

Degree is additive on invertible sheaves over a proper curve

Statement

Assume the Axiom of Choice (The Axiom of Choice). Let k be a field and let C be a proper k-scheme (Proper morphisms) whose underlying topological space has dimension at most one (Chain dimension and the empty-space convention). For all invertible OC-modules L and M (Invertible sheaves):

  1. deg⁡C(L⊗OCM)=deg⁡C(L)+deg⁡C(M);
  2. deg⁡C(L∨)=−deg⁡C(L);
  3. χ(C,L⊗M)−χ(C,L)−χ(C,M)+χ(C,OC)=0,

with deg⁡C as in Degree of an invertible sheaf on a proper one-dimensional scheme and χ as in Euler characteristic of a coherent sheaf. The curve C need not be reduced, irreducible or normal; closed subschemes of proper k-schemes, in particular effective Cartier divisors on proper surfaces, are the intended instances.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: a field k, a proper k-scheme C of dimension at most one, invertible OC-modules L and M, and the Axiom of Choice (The Axiom of Choice).

[F1]

Set-up: C is proper over k, hence of finite type, so its affine charts are spectra of Noetherian rings and C is locally Noetherian and quasi-compact, hence Noetherian (Proper morphisms, Locally Noetherian and Noetherian schemes, Every algebra of finite type over a Noetherian ring is a Noetherian ring). On the locally Noetherian C a quasi-coherent module is coherent if and only if it is of finite type (Coherent sheaves on a locally Noetherian scheme, Coherent module sheaves), and χ(C,G) is defined for every coherent G; in particular deg⁡C is defined on invertible modules (Euler characteristic of a coherent sheaf, Degree of an invertible sheaf on a proper one-dimensional scheme).

[F2]

Exactness and coherence of twisting: tensoring with an invertible module is exact, and the tensor product of an invertible module with a coherent module is coherent; the unit isomorphism gives OC⊗G≅G (Invertible sheaves, Locally free sheaves of finite rank, A sequence of abelian sheaves is exact exactly when it is exact on every stalk, Tensor product preserves quasi-coherence, The regular module is a tensor unit: R⊗RN≅N and M⊗RR≅M, Coherent module sheaves).

[F3]

Euler characteristic is additive in short exact sequences of coherent modules on the proper k-scheme C (Euler characteristic is additive in short exact sequences).

[F4]

Noetherian devissage (Noetherian devissage for coherent proper pushforward): a property of coherent OC-modules that holds for the zero module, satisfies the two-of-three property in every short exact sequence of coherent modules, and holds for a suitable witness on every integral closed subscheme of C, holds for every coherent OC-module. The witnesses are modules with support in the subscheme whose generic stalk is annihilated by the maximal ideal and is one-dimensional over the residue field.

[F5]

Integral closed subschemes of C: an integral closed subscheme Z⊆C is nonempty, reduced and irreducible; since dim⁡C≤1, either Z has dimension one, or Z is a single closed point (Integral schemes, Chain dimension and the empty-space convention, Closed immersions of schemes). Write i:Z→C for the closed immersion and ξZ for the generic point of Z; then OZ,ξZ=κ(ξZ) is a field, the structure sheaf OZ is coherent on the locally Noetherian Z, and i∗OZ is coherent on C, with (i∗OZ)ξZ≅κ(ξZ) annihilated by the maximal ideal of OC,ξZ (Coherent module sheaves, Closed immersion preserves cohomology and coherent pushforward).

[F6]

Projection formula and closed-immersion cohomology (Projection formula for a closed immersion and an invertible sheaf, Closed immersion preserves cohomology and coherent pushforward): for an invertible OC-module N and a quasi-coherent OZ-module G there are isomorphisms N⊗i∗G≅i∗(i∗N⊗G) and Hq(C,N⊗i∗G)≅Hq(Z,i∗N⊗G) for all q; when G is coherent, these isomorphisms also give χ(C,N⊗i∗G)=χ(Z,i∗N⊗G).

[F7]

Closed points: for a closed point p of C with residue field κ(p) the pushforward i∗κ(p) is coherent, and N⊗i∗κ(p)≅i∗κ(p) for every invertible N, so that χ(C,N⊗i∗κ(p))=χ(C,i∗κ(p)) (Euler characteristic of a closed point, and invariance under an invertible twist; Support of a module sheaf).

[F8]

Integral curves: if Z⊆C is an integral closed subscheme of dimension one, then Z is an integral proper k-scheme of dimension one, so for invertible modules N on Z and coherent F on Z one has χ(Z,N⊗F)=rdeg⁡Z(N)+χ(Z,F) with r the rank of F at the generic point; for invertible F the rank is one, and i∗L, i∗M are invertible on Z (Twisting a coherent sheaf by an invertible sheaf on an integral proper curve, Degree of an invertible sheaf on a proper one-dimensional scheme).

[F9]

Dual and tensor: L∨⊗OCL≅OC canonically, so deg⁡C(OC)=0 and statements about L⊗L∨ may be read off from the additive identity of statement 1 (Dual of a line bundle is its tensor inverse, Degree of an invertible sheaf on a proper one-dimensional scheme).

[F10]

The Axiom of Choice enters through the Euler-characteristic, additivity, devissage and integral-curve suppliers [F3]–[F8]; the tensor computations below make no selection.

Proof

technique · devissage on the Noetherian scheme $C$ for the defect $D(\mathcal F):=\chi(C,\mathcal F)-\chi(C,\mathcal L\otimes\mathcal F)-\chi(C,\mathcal M\otimes\mathcal F)+\chi(C,\mathcal L\otimes\mathcal M\otimes\mathcal F)$
1.1F1F2

Set-up and defect. For a coherent OC-module F the four tensor products appearing in D(F) are coherent by [F2], so all four Euler characteristics are defined; by [F2] D(OC)=χ(C,OC)−χ(C,L)−χ(C,M)+χ(C,L⊗M), and it suffices for statements 1 and 3 to prove D(F)=0 for the single coherent module F=OC.

1.2F2F3

Additivity of the defect. Let 0→F′→F→F′′→0 be a short exact sequence of coherent OC-modules. Tensoring with L, with M and with L⊗M preserves exactness by [F2], so all four sequences appearing in D are short exact with coherent terms, and [F3] gives χ(C,G)=χ(C,G′)+χ(C,G′′) for G∈{F,L⊗F,M⊗F,L⊗M⊗F}. Adding the untwisted and doubly twisted identities and subtracting the two singly twisted identities yields D(F)=D(F′)+D(F′′); in particular D has the two-of-three property, and D(0)=0.

1.3F5

Integral closed subschemes. By [F5] an integral closed subscheme Z⊆C is either a closed point or of dimension one; in both cases the witness G:=OZ pushed forward along i is coherent on C, has support contained in Z, generic stalk κ(ξZ) annihilated by the maximal ideal of OC,ξZ, of dimension one over κ(ξZ).

2.1F7step 1.3

The closed-point case. If Z={p} is a closed point, then i∗OZ=i∗κ(p) and [F7] gives D(i∗κ(p))=χ(C,i∗κ(p))−χ(C,i∗κ(p))−χ(C,i∗κ(p))+χ(C,i∗κ(p))=0, because each of the twisted modules L⊗i∗κ(p), M⊗i∗κ(p) and L⊗M⊗i∗κ(p) is isomorphic to i∗κ(p).

2.2F6F8step 1.3

The one-dimensional case. If Z has dimension one, then Z is an integral proper curve of dimension one over k, and by the projection formula of [F6] applied to the invertible modules OC, L, M, L⊗M and to G=OZ, D(i∗OZ)=χ(Z,OZ)−χ(Z,i∗L)−χ(Z,i∗M)+χ(Z,i∗L⊗i∗M). The modules i∗L and i∗M are invertible on Z, and i∗L⊗i∗M≅i∗(L⊗M) has generic rank one; the integral-curve twist identity of [F8] applied on Z with invertible F=i∗M gives χ(Z,i∗L⊗i∗M)=deg⁡Z(i∗L)+χ(Z,i∗M), and deg⁡Z(i∗L)=χ(Z,i∗L)−χ(Z,OZ) by definition of the degree. Substituting, the right-hand side vanishes.

3.1F1F4step 1.2step 2.1step 2.2

Devissage and the additive identity. By steps 1.2, 2.1 and 2.2 the defect D holds for the zero module, satisfies the two-of-three property, and vanishes on the witness i∗OZ of every integral closed subscheme Z⊆C; the devissage lemma [F4] therefore gives D(F)=0 for every coherent OC-module F. Applying this to F=OC and using D(OC)=χ(C,OC)−χ(C,L)−χ(C,M)+χ(C,L⊗M) yields statement 3, and rearranging gives χ(C,L⊗M)−χ(C,OC)=(χ(C,L)−χ(C,OC))+(χ(C,M)−χ(C,OC)), which is statement 1 by the definition of deg⁡C.

4.1F9step 3.1

Statement 2. Applying statement 1 of step 3.1 to the pair (L,L∨) and using L⊗L∨≅OC and deg⁡C(OC)=0 of [F9] gives 0=deg⁡C(OC)=deg⁡C(L⊗L∨)=deg⁡C(L)+deg⁡C(L∨), hence deg⁡C(L∨)=−deg⁡C(L).

5.1F10step 3.1step 4.1∎

Conclusion and choice accounting. Step 3.1 gives statements 1 and 3 and step 4.1 gives statement 2. The Axiom of Choice enters only through the suppliers recorded in [F10]: the Euler-characteristic additivity [F3], the devissage lemma [F4], the projection formula and closed-immersion cohomology [F6], the closed-point twist invariance [F7] and the integral-curve twist identity [F8]; the curve, the sheaves and the point arguments are given, and no selection is made in steps 1.1–3.1.

DefinitionDefinition: Literature-sourcedProof: Not applicableprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-6.1-sol)Open item page →

Intersection numbers of Cartier divisors on a smooth projective surface

Definition

Assume the Axiom of Choice, inherited from the Euler-characteristic supplier below (The Axiom of Choice). Let k be a field and let X be an integral (Integral schemes), regular (embedding dimension and regular local ring), projective (Projective morphisms before Proj) k-scheme of pure dimension two (Chain dimension and the empty-space convention). A smooth projective surface over k is an instance: for a finite-type k-scheme, smoothness over k makes every local ring regular (Smoothness over a field by geometric regularity), and a smooth projective surface is integral by hypothesis here.

The scheme X is proper over k (Projective morphisms are proper), integral, and of finite type over the field k, hence locally Noetherian (Locally Noetherian and Noetherian schemes); the structure sheaf, its dual, all invertible sheaves (Invertible sheaves) and all their tensor products and duals are coherent OX-modules (Coherent module sheaves, Dual of a line bundle is its tensor inverse), so the Euler characteristic χ(X,−) of Euler characteristic of a coherent sheaf is defined on all sheaves appearing below and takes values in Z.

The pairing on line bundles. For invertible OX-modules L and M define L⋅M:=χ(X,OX)−χ(X,L∨)−χ(X,M∨)+χ(X,L∨⊗OXM∨)∈Z, the tensor product being that of Tensor product of sheaves of modules.

The pairing on Cartier divisors. For Cartier divisors C and D on X (Cartier divisor) with associated invertible sheaves OX(C) and OX(D) (Invertible sheaf of cartier divisor) define C⋅D:=OX(C)⋅OX(D)∈Z.

Basic properties.

  1. Isomorphism invariance. The value depends only on the isomorphism classes of L and M: duals and tensor products are functorial under isomorphism (Dual of a line bundle is its tensor inverse, Tensor product of sheaves of modules) and the Euler characteristic is an invariant of isomorphism classes (Euler characteristic of a coherent sheaf). Hence the pairing is a well-defined map Pic⁡(X)×Pic⁡(X)→Z with Pic⁡(X) the Picard group of Picard group of a scheme.
  2. Symmetry and the structure sheaf. The defining expression is symmetric in L and M, so L⋅M=M⋅L. Substituting M=OX gives L⋅OX=χ(X,OX)−χ(X,L∨)−χ(X,OX)+χ(X,L∨)=0, and equally OX⋅L=0.
  3. Linear equivalence. If C′ is linearly equivalent to C and D′ to D, then OX(C′)≅OX(C) and OX(D′)≅OX(D): linear equivalence of Cartier divisors is vanishing of the class in CaDiv⁡(X)/Prin⁡C(X), and for the integral X the rule D↦[OX(D)] induces an isomorphism CaDiv⁡(X)/Prin⁡C(X)→∼Pic⁡(X) (On an integral scheme, Cartier divisors modulo principal divisors compute the Picard group), with addition of divisors corresponding to tensor product (Addition of Cartier divisors is tensor product of their sheaves). By part 1 the value C⋅D depends only on these isomorphism classes, so C′⋅D′=C⋅D.

The pairing is studied in The surface intersection product is symmetric and bilinear, where it is proved to be a symmetric Z-bilinear form on Pic⁡(X); for an effective Cartier divisor C⊆X the restriction-degree identity of Intersection with a curve is the degree of the restriction identifies the value with the degree of a restricted line bundle, and The intersection matrix of a point blowup of a regular surface computes it on a point blowup.

TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedprecheck passOpen item page →

The surface intersection product is symmetric and bilinear

Statement

Assume the Axiom of Choice (The Axiom of Choice). Let k be a field, let X be an integral regular projective surface over k (Intersection numbers of Cartier divisors on a smooth projective surface) and let L,M,N be invertible OX-modules (Invertible sheaves). Then (L⊗M)⋅N=L⋅N+M⋅N,L⋅(M⊗N)=L⋅M+L⋅N; consequently the intersection product is a symmetric Z-bilinear pairing Pic⁡(X)×Pic⁡(X)→Z and L⋅OX=0. Equivalently, for Cartier divisors on X: (C+C′)⋅D=C⋅D+C′⋅D,C⋅(D+D′)=C⋅D+C⋅D′,C⋅D=D⋅C.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: a field k, an integral regular projective surface X over k, invertible OX-modules L,M,N, and Cartier divisors C,D on X.

[F1]

The surface: X is proper over k (Projective morphisms are proper), integral, and of finite type over k, hence Noetherian and locally Noetherian (Every algebra of finite type over a Noetherian ring is a Noetherian ring, Locally Noetherian and Noetherian schemes, Integral schemes); χ(X,−) is defined on coherent modules and the intersection product on invertible modules and Cartier divisors is defined, symmetric in its two arguments, vanishes against OX, and depends only on the isomorphism classes of the line bundles, equivalently only on the linear equivalence classes of the divisors (Intersection numbers of Cartier divisors on a smooth projective surface).

[F2]

Ample and very ample twists: fix a projective embedding of X in the H-projective convention and let OX(1) be the pullback of the twisting sheaf of projective space; then OX(1) is H-very ample relative to Spec⁡k, hence ample (Projective morphisms before Proj, Relative very ampleness in the finite projective-space convention, Relative very ampleness implies relative ampleness, Absolute ampleness by affine section opens).

[F3]

Effective Cartier divisors: an effective Cartier divisor H has invertible ideal sheaf OX(−H), closed immersion i:H↪X, and short exact sequence 0→OX(−H)→OX→i∗OH→0; twisting by an invertible N gives 0→N(−H)→N→i∗(N∣H)→0 (Effective cartier divisor, Invertible sheaf of cartier divisor, Effective Cartier divisors give a short exact sequence, Twisting the exact sequence of an effective Cartier divisor). Moreover H is a proper k-scheme of dimension at most one (A minimal prime over a principal nonzerodivisor has height one, Chain dimension and the empty-space convention, Projective morphisms are proper), so the degree and the quadratic identity of Degree is additive on invertible sheaves over a proper curve apply on H.

[F4]

Additivity of χ and the projection formula: for a short exact sequence of coherent modules on X the Euler characteristic is additive (Euler characteristic is additive in short exact sequences), and χ(X,i∗F)=χ(H,F) for coherent F on H (Projection formula for a closed immersion and an invertible sheaf).

[F5]

Global generation: since X is projective over the Noetherian field k with OX(1) ample, for every coherent F there is m0 with F⊗OX(1)⊗m globally generated for all m≥m0 (Eventual generation of coherent projective twists); on the integral nonempty X a nonzero global section of an invertible sheaf is regular, and its zero scheme is an effective Cartier divisor Z(s) with OX(Z(s))≅L (A regular global section of an invertible sheaf glues to an effective Cartier divisor, Zero scheme of a line-bundle section).

[F6]

Divisor dictionary on the integral surface: D↦[OX(D)] induces an isomorphism CaDiv⁡(X)/Prin⁡C(X)→∼Pic⁡(X), so D is linearly equivalent to D′ exactly when OX(D)≅OX(D′), and OX(D+D′)≅OX(D)⊗OX(D′), OX(−D)≅OX(D)∨ (On an integral scheme, Cartier divisors modulo principal divisors compute the Picard group, Addition of Cartier divisors is tensor product of their sheaves, Dual of a line bundle is its tensor inverse).

[F7]

The Axiom of Choice is inherited through the properness and ampleness suppliers [F1]–[F2], the curve identity of [F3] (via devissage), the Euler-characteristic and cohomology suppliers of [F4], and eventual global generation in [F5]. The divisor dictionary [F6] uses no choice principle; the tensor computations below make no selection.

Proof

technique · direct; prove the shift identity for an effective divisor by substituting two twisting sequences into the defining four-term expression, then reduce arbitrary divisors to differences of effective ones via global generation
1.1F1F3F4F6

Set-up and the shift identity. For invertible modules L1,L2 write Φ(L1,L2) for the defining expression χ(X,OX)−χ(X,L1∨)−χ(X,L2∨)+χ(X,L1∨⊗L2∨), so that L1⋅L2=Φ(L1,L2); for an effective Cartier divisor H write L2(H)=L2⊗OX(H) and set e(N):=χ(X,N)−χ(X,N(−H)) for invertible N, so that e(N)=χ(H,N∣H) by the twisting sequence, additivity of χ and the projection formula. Expanding the four terms and using L2(H)∨=L2∨(−H) gives Φ(L1,L2(H))−Φ(L1,L2)−Φ(L1,OX(H))=e(L1∨)+e(L2∨)−e(OX)−e(L1∨⊗L2∨), and substituting e(N)=χ(H,N∣H) the right-hand side becomes the negative of χ(H,OH)−χ(H,L1∨∣H)−χ(H,L2∨∣H)+χ(H,L1∨∣H⊗L2∨∣H), which vanishes by part 3 of Degree is additive on invertible sheaves over a proper curve applied to the proper curve H and the invertible sheaves L1∨∣H, L2∨∣H. Hence Φ(L1,L2(H))=Φ(L1,L2)+Φ(L1,OX(H)) for every effective Cartier divisor H. The defining expression is symmetric, Φ(L,OX)=0, and Φ depends only on isomorphism classes; writing Φ(C,D):=Φ(OX(C),OX(D)) for Cartier divisors, the divisor dictionary shows that Φ(C,D) depends only on the linear equivalence classes of C and D.

1.2F2F5F6

Differences of effective divisors. Every Cartier divisor on X is linearly equivalent to a difference E−F of effective Cartier divisors: since X is projective over the Noetherian field k and OX(1) is ample, there is an integer m for which both OX(D)⊗OX(1)⊗m and OX(1)⊗m are globally generated; choosing nonzero global sections s and t and using that X is integral, the zero schemes E=Z(s) and F=Z(t) are effective Cartier divisors with OX(E)≅OX(D)⊗OX(1)⊗m and OX(F)≅OX(1)⊗m, so OX(E−F)≅OX(D) and D is linearly equivalent to E−F.

2.1F6step 1.1

Effective additivity. Let H be an effective Cartier divisor and let C,D be Cartier divisors. By the shift identity of step 1.1 and the dictionary of [F6], Φ(C,D+H)=Φ(C,D)+Φ(C,H). In particular, for effective C,D1,D2 the identity Φ(C,D1+D2)=Φ(C,D1)+Φ(C,D2) holds by taking D=D1 and H=D2.

3.1step 1.2step 2.1

Additivity in the second variable. Let D1,D2 be arbitrary Cartier divisors and choose, by step 1.2, effective E1,E2,F1,F2 with Di linearly equivalent to Ei−Fi. Then D1+F1 is linearly equivalent to E1, and D2+F2 to E2; since the values of Φ depend only on linear equivalence classes, applying step 2.1 twice with the effective divisors F1,F2 gives Φ(C,D1+D2)+Φ(C,F1)+Φ(C,F2)=Φ(C,D1+D2+F1+F2)=Φ(C,E1+E2)=Φ(C,E1)+Φ(C,E2), while applying step 2.1 to each pair (Di,Fi) gives Φ(C,Ei)=Φ(C,Di)+Φ(C,Fi). Substituting and cancelling Φ(C,F1)+Φ(C,F2) yields Φ(C,D1+D2)=Φ(C,D1)+Φ(C,D2) for all Cartier divisors C,D1,D2.

4.1F1F6step 3.1

Additivity in the first variable and vanishing at zero. The defining expression is symmetric in its two arguments, so Φ(C1+C2,D)=Φ(D,C1+C2)=Φ(D,C1)+Φ(D,C2)=Φ(C1,D)+Φ(C2,D) by step 3.1 applied with first argument D; hence Φ is additive in each variable, and Φ(C,0)=Φ(0,D)=0 because OX(0)=OX and Φ(L,OX)=0.

5.1F7step 2.1step 3.1step 4.1∎

Translation to line bundles and conclusion. Since X is integral, every invertible sheaf on X is isomorphic to OX(C) for a Cartier divisor C, well defined modulo linear equivalence; under this dictionary tensor products and duals of line bundles correspond to sums and negatives of divisors, and Φ depends only on the classes. Hence the divisor identities of steps 2.1, 3.1 and 4.1 translate into (L⊗M)⋅N=L⋅N+M⋅N,L⋅(M⊗N)=L⋅M+L⋅N,L⋅M=M⋅L,L⋅OX=0 for all invertible L,M,N: the intersection product is a symmetric Z-bilinear pairing Pic⁡(X)×Pic⁡(X)→Z. The Axiom of Choice enters only through the suppliers of [F7], in particular the eventual global generation of [F5], the Euler-characteristic additivity and projection formula of [F4] and the curve identity of [F3] used in step 1.1; the two sections chosen in step 1.2 are single sections of specific sheaves, not a family, and no further selection is made.

TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-6.1-sol)Open item page →

Intersection with a curve is the degree of the restriction

Statement

Assume the Axiom of Choice (The Axiom of Choice). Let k be a field, let X be an integral regular projective surface over k (Intersection numbers of Cartier divisors on a smooth projective surface) and let C and D be effective Cartier divisors on X (Effective cartier divisor, Cartier divisor) with associated line bundles OX(C) and OX(D) (Invertible sheaf of cartier divisor). Then C⋅D=deg⁡C(OX(D)∣C)=deg⁡D(OX(C)∣D), where ⋅ is the intersection product of Intersection numbers of Cartier divisors on a smooth projective surface and deg⁡ is the degree of Degree of an invertible sheaf on a proper one-dimensional scheme on the proper curves C and D.

More generally, if only C is assumed effective, then the first identity C⋅D=deg⁡C(OX(D)∣C) holds for every Cartier divisor D on X, with deg⁡C taken on the curve C. If C is moreover a smooth proper geometrically integral curve, then deg⁡C agrees with the closed-point divisor degree of Degree divisor proper curve on C. The empty curve case C=∅ is included: both sides are then 0.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: a field k, an integral regular projective surface X over k, an effective Cartier divisor C⊆X, and a Cartier divisor D on X.

[F1]

Effective Cartier divisors and closed immersions: an effective Cartier divisor C is given by local equations that are nonzerodivisors, its ideal sheaf IC=OX(−C) is invertible, the inclusion i:C↪X is a closed immersion, and there is a short exact sequence 0→OX(−C)→OX→i∗OC→0 with OX(−C) invertible (Effective cartier divisor, Invertible sheaf of cartier divisor, Effective Cartier divisors give a short exact sequence, Closed immersions of schemes).

[F2]

The curve C is a proper k-scheme of dimension at most one: its irreducible components are minimal primes over the principal ideals cut out by local equations of C, hence have height one by the principal ideal theorem, so dim⁡C≤dim⁡X−1≤1 (A minimal prime over a principal nonzerodivisor has height one, Chain dimension and the empty-space convention); C is a closed subscheme of the proper k-scheme X, hence proper over k (Proper morphisms). The degree deg⁡C is therefore defined on invertible OC-modules (Degree of an invertible sheaf on a proper one-dimensional scheme), and X is Noetherian, locally Noetherian and of finite type over k (Locally Noetherian and Noetherian schemes).

[F3]

Twisting the exact sequence of [F1] by an invertible OX-module N gives a short exact sequence 0→N(−C)→N→i∗(N∣C)→0 with N(−C)=N⊗OX(−C) and N∣C=i∗N (Twisting the exact sequence of an effective Cartier divisor); the Euler characteristic is additive in short exact sequences of coherent modules on the proper k-scheme X (Euler characteristic is additive in short exact sequences), and the closed-immersion projection formula identifies χ(X,i∗F)=χ(C,F) for coherent F on C (Projection formula for a closed immersion and an invertible sheaf). Hence χ(C,N∣C)=χ(X,N)−χ(X,N(−C)) for every invertible N.

[F4]

Definition of the values: writing OX(−C)=OX(C)∨ and OX(−D)=OX(D)∨ and OX(−C−D)=OX(−C)⊗OX(−D), the definition of the intersection product gives C⋅D=χ(X,OX)−χ(X,OX(−C))−χ(X,OX(−D))+χ(X,OX(−C−D)), and deg⁡C(M)=χ(C,M)−χ(C,OC) for invertible M; the defining expression is symmetric in the two divisors (Intersection numbers of Cartier divisors on a smooth projective surface). By part 2 of Degree is additive on invertible sheaves over a proper curve, deg⁡C(M∨)=−deg⁡C(M) for invertible M on the proper curve C of dimension at most one.

[F5]

The smooth case: if C is a smooth proper geometrically integral curve over k and M is an invertible OC-module, then M≅OC(D′) for a divisor D′ on C (Cartier and Weil divisors agree on a smooth curve), and χ(C,OC(D′))−χ(C,OC)=deg⁡k(D′) (Riemann-Roch in Euler-characteristic form: the degree shift); hence deg⁡C(M) equals the closed-point divisor degree deg⁡k(D′) of Degree divisor proper curve.

[F6]

Empty case: if C=∅ then OX(−C)=OX and i∗OC=0, so the defining expression for C⋅D is χ(OX)−χ(OX)−χ(OX(−D))+χ(OX(−D))=0 (Effective cartier divisor, Effective Cartier divisors give a short exact sequence).

[F7]

The Axiom of Choice enters through the Euler-characteristic, devissage, closed-immersion and curve-degree suppliers; no selection is made in the computations below.

Proof

technique · direct; substitute the two twisting sequences into the defining four-term expression and identify the result with a degree
1.1F1F2F3

Set-up. The curve C is a proper k-scheme of dimension at most one, so deg⁡C is defined on invertible OC-modules, and the modules OX(D)∣C=i∗OX(D) and OX(−C), OX(−D), OX(−C−D) appearing below are invertible, hence coherent on the locally Noetherian schemes C and X. In the closed-immersion exact sequence for C the third term is i∗OC, and for an invertible N on X the twist reads 0→N(−C)→N→i∗(N∣C)→0.

1.2F1F3

The chi-difference identity. For every invertible OX-module N, additivity of χ on the twisted sequence of [F1] gives χ(X,N)=χ(X,N(−C))+χ(X,i∗(N∣C)), and the projection formula gives χ(X,i∗(N∣C))=χ(C,N∣C); hence χ(C,N∣C)=χ(X,N)−χ(X,N(−C)).

1.3F5

The smooth comparison. If C is a smooth proper geometrically integral curve, then every invertible module on C is OC(D′) for a divisor D′, and the Euler-characteristic degree shift identifies deg⁡C(OC(D′))=χ(C,OC(D′))−χ(C,OC) with deg⁡k(D′); this is the asserted agreement with the closed-point divisor degree.

1.4F6

The empty case. If C=∅, then the ideal sheaf of C is OX and i∗OC=0, so the four terms of the defining expression cancel in pairs and C⋅D=0; on the empty curve every degree is 0.

2.1F4step 1.2

The main computation. Take the identity of step 1.2 for N=OX and for N=OX(−D): χ(X,OX)−χ(X,OX(−C))=χ(C,OC),χ(X,OX(−D))−χ(X,OX(−C−D))=χ(C,OX(−D)∣C), the second because OX(−D)(−C)=OX(−C−D). Substituting both into the defining expression of [F4], C⋅D=χ(C,OC)−χ(C,OX(−D)∣C). By [F4] applied on C, χ(C,OX(−D)∣C)−χ(C,OC)=deg⁡C(OX(−D)∣C), and by the dual-degree identity of [F4], deg⁡C(OX(−D)∣C)=−deg⁡C(OX(D)∣C) because OX(−D)∣C=(OX(D)∣C)∨. Therefore C⋅D=deg⁡C(OX(D)∣C), the first identity, valid for every Cartier divisor D once C is effective.

3.1F4step 2.1

Both divisors effective. Assume now that D is effective as well. Applying step 2.1 with the roles of C and D interchanged gives D⋅C=deg⁡D(OX(C)∣D), and the defining expression of the intersection product is symmetric by [F4], so C⋅D=D⋅C=deg⁡D(OX(C)∣D). Together with step 2.1 this gives the two asserted identities for effective C and D.

4.1F7step 1.3step 1.4step 2.1step 3.1∎

Conclusion and choice accounting. Step 2.1 proves the general identity C⋅D=deg⁡C(OX(D)∣C) for effective C and arbitrary Cartier D; step 3.1 adds the second identity deg⁡D(OX(C)∣D) when D is effective; step 1.3 proves the agreement of deg⁡C with the closed-point divisor degree on a smooth proper geometrically integral curve; and step 1.4 covers the empty curve. The Axiom of Choice enters only through the suppliers listed in [F7], in particular the Euler-characteristic additivity and projection formula of [F3], the degree and dual-degree statements of [F4] and the curve-degree comparison [F5]; no selection is made in the computations.

LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedprecheck passOpen item page →

The intersection matrix of a point blowup of a regular surface

Statement

Assume the Axiom of Choice (The Axiom of Choice). Let k be a field, let X be an integral regular projective surface over k (Intersection numbers of Cartier divisors on a smooth projective surface), let p∈X be a closed point with residue field κ(p) and r:=[κ(p):k], let π:X′=Bl⁡pX→X be the blowup of X at p (Blowup of a scheme along an ideal sheaf) and let E:=π−1(p) be the exceptional curve (Exceptional subscheme of a blowup). Then:

  1. X′ is an integral regular projective surface over k, E is an effective Cartier divisor, E is isomorphic to Pκ(p)1, and OE(E)≅OPκ(p)1(−1); consequently E⋅E=−r.
  2. For all Cartier divisors D,D′ on X (Cartier divisor): E⋅π∗D=0 and π∗D⋅π∗D′=D⋅D′; in particular (π∗D)2=D2.
  3. If C is a reduced effective Cartier divisor on X through p with multiplicity m:=mult⁡p(C)≥1 (Effective cartier divisor) and strict transform C′ (Strict transform of a closed subscheme), then π∗C=C′+mE, C′⋅E=mr and C′⋅C′=C⋅C−m2r. If p∉C then π∗C=C′ and (C′)2=C2.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: a field k, an integral regular projective surface X over k, a closed point p∈X with residue field κ(p) and residue degree r=[κ(p):k], the blowup π:X′=Bl⁡pX→X and the exceptional curve E=π−1(p), and the Axiom of Choice (The Axiom of Choice).

[F1]

Blowup interfaces: X′=Bl⁡IX=Proj⁡XR(I) for the ideal sheaf I of the closed point p, with structural morphism π and relative twists (Blowup of a scheme along an ideal sheaf); E=π−1(p) is the scheme-theoretic inverse image of the center, a closed subscheme with ideal IOX′ (Exceptional subscheme of a blowup); π is an isomorphism over X∖p and E is the complement of that open subscheme (The blowup is an isomorphism off the center); and π is proper and locally H-projective, and globally H-projective as soon as the ideal is generated by finitely many global sections (Blowups of finite type ideals are locally H-projective, and proper).

[F2]

Integrality and regularity of X′: since X is integral and I is a nonzero ideal of finite type, X′ is integral and π is birational (Blowing up a nonzero ideal on an integral scheme is birational); and since X is a regular finite-type k-scheme of pure dimension two and p is a closed point, X′ is regular of pure dimension two, E is an effective Cartier divisor isomorphic to Pκ(p)1, and OE(E)≅OPκ(p)1(−1) (Point blowups of regular surfaces stay regular, with rational exceptional fibre over the residue field); alternatively E≅P(I/I2)=Pκ(p)1 for the regular immersion p↪X (Regular centers have projective-bundle exceptional divisors, The normal bundle of the exceptional curve is O(-1)).

[F3]

Projective embeddings: an ample twist of the coherent point ideal on X is globally generated (Eventual generation of coherent projective twists, Global generation by the evaluation map). The graded algebra ⨁Id⊗L⊗d has the same relative Proj as R(I) for invertible L (Invariance of the blowup under invertible (fractional) rescaling of the ideal). A graded quotient of OX[z0,…,zN] gives a closed subscheme of PXN (Relative Proj of a graded quasi-coherent algebra, Closed subschemes of projective space and saturated ideals). Closed immersions are preserved by base change (Closed immersions are affine quotients and survive base change). The closed point of a finite-type scheme over k has finite residue degree (A maximal ideal of an affine algebra has finite residue field over the base field).

[F4]

Cohomology of line bundles on the exceptional curve: for E≅Pκ(p)1 over κ(p) and an invertible sheaf M on E of degree d over κ(p), χk(E,M)=r(1+d), where r=[κ(p):k]; in particular χk(E,OE)=r, and for OE(E)≅O(−1) of degree −1 one has χk(E,OE(E))=0 and deg⁡E(OE(E))=χk(E,OE(E))−χk(E,OE)=−r (Euler characteristic of line bundles on a projective line over a finite field extension, Degree of an invertible sheaf on a proper one-dimensional scheme).

[F5]

Pushforward and projection formula: π∗OX′=OX and Rqπ∗OX′=0 for every q>0 (Pushforward and vanishing for point blowups on a surface); consequently χ(X′,π∗N)=χ(X,N) for every invertible OX-module N (Projection formula for invertible twists, Euler characteristic of a coherent sheaf).

[F6]

Effective divisors, twists and transforms: for an effective Cartier divisor H on a surface, the sequence 0→N(−H)→N→i∗(N∣H)→0 is exact for invertible N (Effective Cartier divisors give a short exact sequence, Twisting the exact sequence of an effective Cartier divisor); the total transform π∗D of a Cartier divisor is the pullback Cartier divisor with OX′(π∗D)≅π∗OX(D) (Total transform of a Cartier divisor, Pullback of a Cartier divisor, Pullback of a Cartier divisor computes the pullback of its line bundle); and for a reduced effective Cartier divisor C on the regular surface X through p with multiplicity m≥1, the total transform decomposes as π∗C=C′+mE with C′ the strict transform, which is reduced (Total transform equals strict transform plus multiplicity times the exceptional divisor, Strict transform of a closed subscheme, The reduction of a scheme).

[F7]

The intersection product of Intersection numbers of Cartier divisors on a smooth projective surface is symmetric and Z-bilinear on the Picard group of an integral regular projective surface, and the restriction theorem identifies H⋅F=deg⁡H(O(F)∣H) for effective H (The surface intersection product is symmetric and bilinear, Intersection with a curve is the degree of the restriction); degrees, and with them intersection numbers, are additive on the proper curve H (Degree is additive on invertible sheaves over a proper curve).

[F8]

The Axiom of Choice enters through the blowup, sheaf-cohomology, global-generation and Euler-characteristic suppliers above; the points and divisors appearing below are given data.

Proof

1.1F1F2F3

The ideal I of p is a nonzero coherent ideal on the integral regular projective surface X. Thus the blowup is integral, regular and pure of dimension two; E is effective Cartier, isomorphic to Pκ(p)1, with normal line bundle O(−1). The residue degree r is finite. To apply the intersection theory, we also verify absolute projectivity. Choose X↪Pkn and its ample hyperplane bundle H. For some s, I⊗L, L=H⊗s, is globally generated. A finite set of its global sections generates it: choose finitely many sections spanning each of finitely many affine neighborhoods, possible since X is quasi-compact and the sheaf is of finite type.

2.1F3step 1.1

Put S=⨁d≥0Id⊗L⊗d. The preceding sections yield a graded surjection OX[z0,…,zN]→S, since S is generated in degree one. Its relative Proj is canonically X′ by invertible rescaling; the twist need not be an ordinary ideal. Hence X′ is a closed subscheme of PXN. Base change of X↪Pkn embeds the latter as a closed subscheme of PkN×kPkn.

3.1F3F7step 2.1

The product has a closed Segre embedding into Pk(N+1)(n+1)−1: its coordinates are zab=uavb, and the defining equations are all rank-one minors zabzij−zajzib. On D+(zij), these equations identify its coordinate ring with the polynomial ring on zaj/zij (a≠i) and zib/zij (b≠j); all other coordinates are their products. This is exactly the product of the affine charts D+(ui) and D+(vj), and the identifications respect their ratio transitions. They glue to the closed embedding. Thus X′ is projective over k, and all intersection and proper-cohomology hypotheses are satisfied.

4.1F1F4F6F7step 3.1

By the exceptional-curve Euler formula, χk(E,OE)=r and χk(E,OE(E))=0, so its degree over k is −r. Restriction of the intersection product to the effective curve E gives E2=−r. For any Cartier divisor D on X, π∣E factors through Spec⁡κ(p), since the pulled-back point ideal vanishes on E. The restriction of π∗OX(D) is therefore trivial. Its degree is zero, and the restriction formula gives E⋅π∗D=0. This formula allows arbitrary D; only E must be effective.

4.2F5F6F7step 3.1

Pushforward vanishing and the projection formula give χ(X′,π∗N)=χ(X,N) for every invertible N. Pullback respects tensor products and duals. Apply this equality to the four sheaves OX, OX(D)∨, OX(D′)∨, and their tensor product in the defining Euler-characteristic expression for intersection. The result is π∗D⋅π∗D′=D⋅D′, including the self-intersection case.

5.1F1F6F7F8step 4.1step 4.2∎

For the reduced curve through p, the proved point formula gives π∗C=C′+mE. Orthogonality and symmetry imply 0=E⋅C′+mE2, hence C′⋅E=mr. Bilinearity and step 4.2 give C2=(C′+mE)2=(C′)2+2m2r−m2r, so (C′)2=C2−m2r. If p∉C, a local equation is a unit near p; its pullback misses E, and the off-center isomorphism gives π∗C=C′. The same pullback identity yields (C′)2=C2. Choice enters only through the recorded suppliers.

5 · Examples, counterexamples and false statements

None yet.

Sources