How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Intersection Products on Smooth Projective Surfaces
1 · Prerequisites
- Abelian Categories
- Adjunctions Units and Counits
- Affine Algebraic Sets and Coordinate Rings
- Affine Schemes and the Structure Sheaf
- Algebraic Closure, Embeddings, and Separability
- Algebraic Differentials Separability and Smooth Local Presentations
- Algebraic Extensions, Extension Degree, and Finite Fields
- Algebraic Zariski Main for Quasi-Finite Morphisms
- Artinian Rings and Length
- Associated Primes and Primary Decomposition
- Binary Operations, Monoids, Groups and Subgroups
- Blowups, Exceptional Divisors, and Strict Transforms
- Cardinal Arithmetic, Cofinality and the Alephs
- Cartier and Weil Divisors Line Bundles and Picard Groups
- Categories, Functors and Natural Transformations
- Chain Complexes and Homology
- Chain Conditions, Semisimple Modules and the Wedderburn–Artin Theorem
- Chain Homotopy and the Homotopy Category
- Classical Affine Varieties: Coordinate Rings, Morphisms, and Rational Maps
- Cohomology of Quasi Coherent Sheaves on Affine and Projective Schemes
- Combinatorial Classes and the Symbolic Method
- Compactness
- Compactness in Metric Spaces
- Congruences, the Integers Modulo n and the Chinese Remainder Theorem
- Connectedness
- Construction of the Natural Numbers
- Construction of the Real Numbers via Cauchy Sequences
- Construction of the Real Numbers via Dedekind Cuts
- Cosets, Index and Lagrange's Theorem
- Countability and Uncountability
- Cyclic Groups and Direct Products
- Dedekind Domains and Ideal Classes
- Delta Functors and Universality
- Depth and Cohen Macaulay Modules
- Derived Categories
- Derived Functors
- Determinants of Matrices over a Commutative Ring
- Diagonalisation and the Minimal Polynomial
- Diagonals Separated Morphisms and Valuative Uniqueness
- Dimension Constructible Images and Dimensions of Fibres
- Divisibility, Euclidean Domains, Principal Ideal Domains and Unique Factorisation
- Divisibility, Greatest Common Divisors and Bézout's Identity
- Double Complexes Exact Couples and Convergence
- Eigenvalues, Eigenvectors and the Characteristic Polynomial
- Exactness and the Member Calculus
- Ext and Balanced Resolutions
- Fibre Products Base Change and Scheme Theoretic Fibres
- Finite Counting, Factorials and Binomial Coefficients
- Finite Fields and Cyclotomic Extensions
- Finite Proper and Projective Morphisms
- Flat Smooth and Etale Morphisms
- Flatness and Faithful Flatness
- Formal Power Series
- Foundations of the Real Numbers for Analysis
- Free Modules, Exact Sequences, Projective and Injective Modules
- Group Actions, Orbits, Stabilisers and Cayley's Theorem
- Group Homomorphisms and the Isomorphism Theorems
- Homogeneous Resultants and Projective Intersection Length
- Ideals, Quotient Rings and the Isomorphism Theorems for Rings
- Integral Extensions and Going Up
- Kahler Differentials Conormal Sequences and Infinitesimal Lifting
- Koszul Complexes and Regular Sequences
- Krull Dimension and Height Theorems
- Limits and Colimits
- Linear Independence, Bases and Dimension
- Linear Transformations, Rank-Nullity and Quotient Spaces
- Localisation of Modules and Support
- Long Exact Sequences in Homology
- Mapping Cones Cylinders and Chain Triangles
- Matrices, the Matrix of a Linear Map, and Change of Basis
- Metric Spaces
- Modules over a Principal Ideal Domain and the Canonical Forms
- Modules, Submodules, Quotient Modules and the Isomorphism Theorems
- Monotone Sequences, Bolzano-Weierstrass, and Cauchy Completeness
- Noether Normalisation and Nullstellensatz
- Noetherian Rings and Hilbert Basis
- Normal Subgroups and Quotient Groups
- Order, Zorn's Lemma, and the Axiom of Choice
- Ordinal Arithmetic and the First Uncountable Ordinal
- Ordinals, Cardinals, and Transfinite Recursion
- Polynomial Rings, the Division Algorithm and Roots
- Preadditive and Additive Categories and Biproducts
- Presheaves Sheaves Stalks and Sheafification
- Prime Spectra and Radicals
- Primes, Euclid's Lemma and the Fundamental Theorem of Arithmetic
- Proj Projective Schemes Twisting Sheaves and Ampleness
- Projective and Injective Resolutions
- Quasi Coherent and Coherent Sheaves and Vector Bundles
- Rees Modules Artin Rees and Hilbert Samuel Theory
- Reflective Subcategories and the Adjoint Functor Theorems
- Regular Local Rings and Homological Dimension
- Relations, Functions, and Quotients
- Riemann Roch for Curves via Euler Characteristics
- Rings, Subrings, Integral Domains and Fields
- Roots, Rational Powers, and Classical Inequalities
- Schemes Subschemes and Morphisms Locally of Finite Type
- Sheaf Cohomology Cech Cohomology and Comparison
- Sheaf Operations Exactness Ringed Spaces and Module Pullback
- Simple Field Extensions and the Construction of the Complex Numbers
- Smooth Proper Curves Divisors Genus and Ramification
- Splitting Fields
- Subobject Lattices Generators and the Grothendieck Axioms
- Subspaces, Products, and Quotients
- Suprema and Infima
- Symmetric Groups, Cycle Decomposition and the Sign Homomorphism
- Tensor Products of Modules
- The Determinant of a Linear Operator, Cofactors and Cramer's Rule
- The Diagram Lemmas in an Abelian Category
- The Field of Fractions and Localisation
- The Fundamental Theorem of Algebra
- The Fundamental Theorem of Finite Abelian Groups
- The Holomorphic Inverse Function Theorem and Weierstrass Preparation
- The ZFC Axioms and the Basic Set Constructions
- Topological Spaces and Continuity
- Topology of ℝ
- Tor Flatness and Global Dimension
- Triangularisation, Generalised Eigenspaces and Jordan Canonical Form
- Triangulated Categories
- Universal Coefficients and Kunneth Theorems
- Universal Properties, Representables and the Yoneda Lemma
- Valuation Rings and Discrete Valuation Rings
- Vector Spaces, Linear Subspaces, Span and Direct Sums
- Yoneda Extensions and Homological Dimension
- Zariski Tangent Spaces, Regular Points, Smoothness, and Bertini
- Zariski Topology on Prime Spectra
2 · Summary
This page develops the numerical intersection product on an integral regular projective surface over a field. It begins with the degree of an invertible sheaf on a proper curve of dimension at most one, defined as the difference of Euler characteristics, and with the two local tools used throughout: the projection formula for a closed immersion and an invertible twist and the invariance of the Euler characteristic of a closed-point skyscraper under an invertible twist. The twisting theorem for an integral proper curve and the resulting additivity of degree on an arbitrary proper curve of dimension at most one are proved by devissage. The alternating-sum definition of the intersection product on an integral regular projective surface, its symmetry and -bilinearity on the Picard group, and the identity expressing the intersection with an effective Cartier divisor as the degree of the restricted line bundle are then established; the final item computes the intersection matrix of a point blowup of a regular surface, including the exceptional square , the orthogonality and pullback identities, and the strict-transform formulas. The companion examples page works the pairing out on the projective plane and on its point blowup, and records the Cartier and complementary-dimension hypotheses that the construction cannot drop.
3 · Logical flowchart
4 · Definitions, theorems and proofs
Degree of an invertible sheaf on a proper one-dimensional scheme
Definition
Assume the Axiom of Choice, inherited from the Euler-characteristic supplier below (The Axiom of Choice). Let be a field (Field) and let be a proper -scheme (Proper morphisms) whose underlying topological space is Noetherian of dimension at most one (Chain dimension and the empty-space convention, Locally Noetherian and Noetherian schemes). Write for the Euler characteristic of coherent sheaves on a proper -scheme (Euler characteristic of a coherent sheaf).
Degree of an invertible sheaf. For an invertible -module (Invertible sheaves) set
Degree of a finite locally free sheaf. For a locally free -module of finite constant rank (Locally free sheaves of finite rank) set
Well-definedness and immediate values.
- The structure sheaf, its dual, and every invertible or locally free finite-rank module on are coherent, so the Euler characteristic applies. Indeed is of finite type over the field , hence every affine chart of is a spectrum of a Noetherian ring (Every algebra of finite type over a Noetherian ring is a Noetherian ring, Locally Noetherian and Noetherian schemes), so is locally Noetherian; on a locally Noetherian scheme the coherent modules are exactly the finite-type quasi-coherent modules (Coherent sheaves on a locally Noetherian scheme), and and every invertible or finite locally free module are quasi-coherent of finite type (Coherent module sheaves, Invertible sheaves, Locally free sheaves of finite rank). Each alternating sum in the definition is therefore finite and defines an integer (Euler characteristic of a coherent sheaf).
- Both expressions depend only on the isomorphism class of the sheaf: an isomorphism of coherent sheaves induces isomorphisms on all cohomology groups (Euler characteristic of a coherent sheaf), so the Euler characteristic, and with it each degree, is an isomorphism invariant. In particular the degree is a function on isomorphism classes, hence on , and on the isomorphism classes of finite locally free modules; the rank alone does not determine their degree.
- , and for every finite locally free of rank , since such a module is the zero sheaf and .
- If , then for every coherent and every and (Euler characteristic of a coherent sheaf); every degree above is therefore .
The dimension bound at most one records that the base is a curve: the definition is applied below to proper curves and to effective Cartier divisors on surfaces, and the degree of a curve in the sense of Degree divisor proper curve agrees with it on smooth proper geometrically integral curves by Riemann-Roch in Euler-characteristic form: the degree shift.
Projection formula for a closed immersion and an invertible sheaf
Statement
Let be a closed immersion of schemes (Closed immersions of schemes), let be an invertible -module (Invertible sheaves) and let be a quasi-coherent -module (Quasi-coherent module on a scheme). Then the canonical map is an isomorphism of -modules; here is the direct image (Direct image of a sheaf along a continuous map), is the pullback of modules (Pullback of a module along a morphism of ringed spaces) and is the tensor product of sheaves of modules (Tensor product of sheaves of modules).
If moreover is locally Noetherian (Locally Noetherian and Noetherian schemes) and is coherent (Coherent module sheaves), then both sides are coherent -modules, and for every there is an isomorphism in particular whenever is proper over a field. The Euler-characteristic and coherence clauses inherit the Axiom of Choice through Closed immersion preserves cohomology and coherent pushforward and Euler characteristic of a coherent sheaf, while the stalkwise isomorphism itself is choice-free beyond the cited sheaf and tensor constructions.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: a closed immersion of schemes, an invertible -module , a quasi-coherent -module , and the Axiom of Choice (The Axiom of Choice).
A closed immersion is a morphism whose underlying map is a homeomorphism onto a closed subset and for which is surjective (Closed immersions of schemes). In particular for every open , the assignment is a surjection from the open subsets of onto the open subsets of , and the open neighbourhoods of a point , with an open neighbourhood of in , are cofinal among the open neighbourhoods of in (Topology on a set, open and closed sets, clopen sets, the closed-set axiomatisation, and the coarser/finer comparison).
Direct image is precomposition: with the evident restrictions, and it is a sheaf when is (Direct image of a sheaf along a continuous map, Direct image preserves sheaves and objectwise algebraic structure). The stalk at is the filtered colimit over open neighbourhoods of (The stalk of a presheaf at a point).
Pullback: is an -module (Pullback of a module along a morphism of ringed spaces); it is quasi-coherent when is quasi-coherent (Scheme pullback preserves quasi-coherence), and invertible -modules are quasi-coherent (Invertible sheaves, Locally free sheaves of finite rank). For every point the stalks satisfy and (The stalk of an inverse image sheaf is the stalk over the image point); the stalk of a tensor product of -modules on a ringed space is the tensor product of the stalks over the stalk of the ring (The stalk of a tensor product sheaf is the tensor product of the stalks).
Module identifications: for a homomorphism of commutative rings , a right -module and a left -module there is a natural isomorphism (Change of rings: ); tensor products over a commutative ring are associative (Associativity of tensor products for compatible bimodules); and for every -module (The regular module is a tensor unit: and ).
A morphism of sheaves on a topological space is an isomorphism if and only if it is bijective on every stalk (A morphism of sheaves is an isomorphism exactly when it is an isomorphism on every stalk).
Tensor products of quasi-coherent modules are quasi-coherent (Tensor product preserves quasi-coherence); on a locally Noetherian scheme a quasi-coherent module is coherent if and only if it is of finite type, and coherence is a local condition on the scheme (Coherent sheaves on a locally Noetherian scheme, Coherent module sheaves).
Assume AC. For a quasi-coherent -module and every there is a canonical isomorphism ; if is locally Noetherian and coherent, then is coherent (Closed immersion preserves cohomology and coherent pushforward, Euler characteristic of a coherent sheaf). The Axiom of Choice is inherited from these suppliers; the change-of-rings identification of [F4] and the stalk computations below make no selection.
Proof
The canonical map. Pullback of modules is left adjoint to pushforward (Pullback of modules is left adjoint to pushforward), so the identity of the -module corresponds to a canonical -linear map . There is also the canonical map , (Pullback of a module along a morphism of ringed spaces). Define, for every open , the -bilinear map These maps are compatible with the restriction maps, so they assemble into a morphism from the tensor presheaf of Tensor product of sheaves of modules to the sheaf , and hence, by the universal property of sheafification, into a morphism of -modules
Stalks off . Let . Since is closed, is an open neighbourhood of with , so in the colimit of [F2] the groups vanish for all open ; as these are cofinal among the neighbourhoods of , the stalk is . Hence by [F3]. Applying the same argument to the quasi-coherent module in place of gives . Thus is a map , hence bijective.
Stalks on . Let . Every open neighbourhood of in has the form with an open neighbourhood of in (Closed immersions of schemes), and these are cofinal in the neighbourhood system of in by [F1]; comparing the colimit description [F2] of the stalk of with the defining colimit of the stalk of (The stalk of a presheaf at a point) gives a canonical isomorphism , compatible with the -module structure because the action on factors through . Similarly .
Put and . By [F3] the source stalk is and the target is . The map sends to . Its inverse sends to : the -balancing relation in and the -balancing relation of the outer tensor both give the same element, so this formula is well defined. The composites are identities, since . Thus is an isomorphism.
Conclusion of the isomorphism. By step 1.2 the stalk is bijective for every , and by step 2.1 it is bijective for every ; hence is an isomorphism of -modules by [F5]. This proves the first clause.
Coherence clause. Assume now that is locally Noetherian and that is coherent. Then is a coherent -module by [F7]. The invertible module is locally free of rank one (Invertible sheaves), so is covered by open subschemes with ; over such the unit isomorphism of [F4] and the stalk computations of [F3] give . Since coherence is local on and is coherent ([F6], [F7]), the sheaf is coherent; its isomorphic image under the isomorphism of step 3.1 is coherent as well.
Cohomology and Euler characteristic. With locally Noetherian and coherent, the isomorphism of step 3.1 identifies with for every ; the quasi-coherent module satisfies by [F7] and [F6]. Hence for every . When is proper over a field, the left side is an alternating sum of finite-dimensional vector spaces (Euler characteristic of a coherent sheaf, step 4.1), so the termwise isomorphic right side gives . The Axiom of Choice enters only through the suppliers named in [F7]; steps 1.1--3.1 make no selection.
Euler characteristic of a closed point, and invariance under an invertible twist
Statement
Assume the Axiom of Choice, inherited from the Euler-characteristic supplier (The Axiom of Choice). Let be a field (Field), let be a proper -scheme, let be a closed point with residue field (The residue field at a point of an affine scheme) and let be the corresponding closed immersion (Closed immersions of schemes); write also for the structure sheaf of . Then is a coherent -module via (Direct image of a sheaf along a continuous map, Coherent module sheaves), and for every invertible -module (Invertible sheaves):
- for every and , a finite integer (Euler characteristic of a coherent sheaf, The degree of a finite field extension);
- is isomorphic to and there is an isomorphism ; consequently .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: a field , a proper -scheme , a closed point with residue field , the corresponding closed immersion , an invertible -module , and the Axiom of Choice (The Axiom of Choice).
Closed immersions: is a closed immersion precisely when its underlying map is a homeomorphism onto a closed subset and is surjective (Closed immersions of schemes). The scheme has exactly one point , so its only open subsets are and (Topology on a set, open and closed sets, clopen sets, the closed-set axiomatisation, and the coarser/finer comparison); the stalk of any sheaf on at is therefore , since is the only neighbourhood of (The stalk of a presheaf at a point). The structure sheaf satisfies , so is the one-point sheaf with value , written (The localization construction extends to the structure sheaf on Spec A, The residue field at a point of an affine scheme).
Properness of over gives finite type, so every affine chart of is a spectrum of a Noetherian ring and is locally Noetherian (Locally Noetherian and Noetherian schemes); on a locally Noetherian scheme a quasi-coherent module is coherent if and only if it is of finite type, and , being the spectrum of a field, is locally Noetherian (Coherent sheaves on a locally Noetherian scheme, Coherent module sheaves). The structure sheaf is finite type and quasi-coherent, hence coherent on ; consequently is coherent on whenever is locally Noetherian (Closed immersion preserves cohomology and coherent pushforward).
Residue degrees: the closed point lies in an affine open with a finite-type -algebra, and corresponds to a maximal ideal with ; by A maximal ideal of an affine algebra has finite residue field over the base field the residue field is a finite extension of , so the degree of The degree of a finite field extension is a finite integer.
Pushforward cohomology and vanishing: for the quasi-coherent -module there are isomorphisms for every (Closed immersion preserves cohomology and coherent pushforward). The space is a one-point Noetherian space of dimension (Chain dimension and the empty-space convention), so for every sheaf of abelian groups on and every (Grothendieck vanishing on a Noetherian space); and (Degree-zero sheaf cohomology is global sections, [F1]).
Stalks of pullback: for the morphism and the point one has and (The stalk of an inverse image sheaf is the stalk over the image point); the pullback (Pullback of a module along a morphism of ringed spaces) therefore has stalk (The stalk of a tensor product sheaf is the tensor product of the stalks). Since is invertible, (Invertible sheaves; Locally free sheaves of finite rank), and (The regular module is a tensor unit: and ); hence by [F1].
Projection formula: for the closed immersion , the invertible module and the quasi-coherent -module , the canonical map is an isomorphism, and for every (Projection formula for a closed immersion and an invertible sheaf); moreover once ([F5], The regular module is a tensor unit: and ).
The Axiom of Choice is inherited from the Euler-characteristic, closed-immersion and pushforward suppliers cited in [F2]–[F6]; the computations below make no selection.
Proof
Set-up. The morphism is a closed immersion with image the closed point , so is a homeomorphism onto ; the scheme has one point , its structure sheaf is the one-point sheaf , and the stalk of any sheaf on at is its group of global sections. Since is proper over , it is of finite type over the field , hence locally Noetherian.
Coherence. The structure sheaf is a finite-type quasi-coherent -module, so it is coherent on the locally Noetherian ; the pushforward is then a coherent -module.
Finite residue degree. The closed point corresponds to a maximal ideal of a finite-type -algebra, so is a finite extension of and is a finite integer.
Cohomology of . For every there is an isomorphism ; the cohomology of on the one-point space vanishes in positive degrees, and . Hence for and .
The pullback of is trivial. The stalk of at the unique point is , and this is also the group of global sections: . A morphism of sheaves on the one-point space is determined by its component on global sections, so a -linear isomorphism extends to a morphism of -modules whose stalk at is an isomorphism; by the stalkwise criterion this morphism is an isomorphism, so .
Part (1). The Euler characteristic of the coherent module on the proper -scheme is the finite alternating sum ; by step 1.4 only contributes, with , so by step 1.3.
Part (2). By the projection formula the canonical map is an isomorphism; substituting the isomorphism of step 1.5 and the unit isomorphism identifies the target with . Hence .
Consequence for the Euler characteristic. The isomorphism of step 2.2 induces isomorphisms for every , so the two alternating sums agree: by step 2.1.
Conclusion and choice accounting. Steps 1.4 and 2.1 give statement (1), steps 1.5 and 2.2 give the two isomorphism clauses of statement (2), and step 3.1 gives its Euler-characteristic consequence. The Axiom of Choice is used only through the suppliers recorded in [F7]: the Euler-characteristic and pushforward technology of [F2] and [F4], the closed-immersion and projection-formula machinery of [F6], and the residue-field finiteness of [F3]; the point , the sheaf and the morphism are part of the given data, and no selection is made in steps 1.1–3.1.
Twisting a coherent sheaf by an invertible sheaf on an integral proper curve
Statement
Assume the Axiom of Choice (The Axiom of Choice). Let be a field (Field) and let be an integral (Integral schemes) proper -scheme (Proper morphisms) whose underlying topological space has dimension one (Chain dimension and the empty-space convention). Let be an invertible -module (Invertible sheaves) and let be a coherent -module (Coherent module sheaves); let be the generic point of and let be the rank of at . Then with as in Degree of an invertible sheaf on a proper one-dimensional scheme and the Euler characteristic of Euler characteristic of a coherent sheaf.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: a field , an integral proper -scheme of dimension one, an invertible -module , a coherent -module , the generic point of , and the Axiom of Choice (The Axiom of Choice).
Set-up: since is proper over the field it is of finite type over , and its affine charts are spectra of Noetherian rings, so is locally Noetherian and quasi-compact, hence Noetherian (Proper morphisms, Locally Noetherian and Noetherian schemes, Every algebra of finite type over a Noetherian ring is a Noetherian ring). On the locally Noetherian scheme a quasi-coherent module is coherent if and only if it is of finite type (Coherent sheaves on a locally Noetherian scheme, Coherent module sheaves), and is defined for every coherent (Euler characteristic of a coherent sheaf).
Generic point and rank: because is integral it has a unique generic point , and is its function field; the stalk of a coherent module at is a finite-dimensional -vector space, so is a finite integer (Integral schemes, Chain dimension and the empty-space convention). The degree is defined by (Degree of an invertible sheaf on a proper one-dimensional scheme).
Exactness of twisting: an invertible module is locally free of rank one (Invertible sheaves, Locally free sheaves of finite rank), and tensoring with a locally free module is exact: exactness of a sequence of sheaves is stalkwise (A sequence of abelian sheaves is exact exactly when it is exact on every stalk), at each point the stalk of is free of rank one, and tensoring modules over a ring by a free module preserves kernels and cokernels. Tensor products of quasi-coherent modules are quasi-coherent (Tensor product preserves quasi-coherence), and the tensor product of an invertible module with a coherent module is coherent: the question is local, and on an affine open trivialising the unit isomorphism of The regular module is a tensor unit: and identifies with for a coherent , while coherence is a local condition (Coherent module sheaves, Coherent sheaves on a locally Noetherian scheme).
Euler characteristic is additive in short exact sequences of coherent modules on the proper -scheme : (Euler characteristic is additive in short exact sequences).
For a short exact sequence of coherent sheaves, the stalk sequence at is a short exact sequence of -vector spaces (A sequence of abelian sheaves is exact exactly when it is exact on every stalk, Localisation of modules is exact), and dimension is additive on short exact sequences (Rank-nullity: ); hence .
Noetherian devissage (Noetherian devissage for coherent proper pushforward): let be a property of coherent -modules which holds for the zero module and satisfies the two-of-three property in every short exact sequence of coherent modules. Suppose that for every integral closed subscheme with generic point there is a coherent -module with , whose stalk is annihilated by and is one-dimensional over , and for which holds. Then holds for every coherent -module.
The closed points: for a closed point the canonical morphism is a closed immersion, is a coherent -module with support , and ; moreover (Euler characteristic of a closed point, and invariance under an invertible twist, Support of a module sheaf).
The integral closed subschemes of the one-dimensional Noetherian space are itself and the closed points: a proper irreducible closed subset of the integral one-dimensional Noetherian scheme has dimension zero (otherwise a length-one chain inside it extends to a length-two chain in ), and an integral zero-dimensional scheme consists of its single generic point, which is then closed (Chain dimension and the empty-space convention, Integral schemes).
The Axiom of Choice enters through the Euler-characteristic, additivity and devissage suppliers [L1]–[L4]; the tensor and stalk computations below make no selection.
Proof
The property and its defect. For a coherent -module define to be the identity , and define the defect , so that holds exactly when . The tensor products and stalks appearing are coherent and finite-dimensional by [F1]–[F3].
Additivity of the defect. Let be a short exact sequence of coherent -modules. Tensoring with preserves exactness by [F3], so is short exact with coherent terms, and by [L1]; likewise ; and by [L2]. Subtracting the last two identities from the first gives . In particular, if two of vanish then so does the third, and because the zero sheaf has zero cohomology and zero rank.
The integral closed subschemes. By [L5] every integral closed subscheme is either itself or a closed point ; in the first case the generic point of is itself, and in the second case the generic point of is , with residue field .
Witness on . Take : it is coherent, its support is , its stalk at the generic point is (so its generic stalk is annihilated by the maximal ideal and has dimension one over ), and holds because and by the definition of .
Witness on a closed point. Let be a closed point and take as in [L4]. It is coherent, its support is , its stalk at the generic point of the closed subscheme is (annihilated by the maximal ideal and one-dimensional over ), and is the identity , which holds by the twist-invariance clause of [L4].
Devissage. By steps 1.2–2.2 the property satisfies all hypotheses of [L3]: it holds for , it has the two-of-three property, and it holds on every integral closed subscheme of (witnesses for itself and for each closed point ). Therefore holds for every coherent -module, in particular for the given : , which is the asserted identity.
Consequence for invertible twists. If is itself invertible with generic rank , the identity reads , whence ; this will be used through the additivity theorem on curves.
Choice accounting and conclusion. Step 3.1 proves the displayed identity for arbitrary coherent and step 4.1 records the rank-one case. The Axiom of Choice enters exactly through the suppliers recorded in [L6]: the Euler-characteristic and additivity technology [L1], the stalk and dimension additivity [L2], the devissage lemma [L3] and the closed-point twist invariance [L4]; the scheme, the sheaf and the point are given, and steps 1.1–4.1 make no selection.
Degree is additive on invertible sheaves over a proper curve
Statement
Assume the Axiom of Choice (The Axiom of Choice). Let be a field and let be a proper -scheme (Proper morphisms) whose underlying topological space has dimension at most one (Chain dimension and the empty-space convention). For all invertible -modules and (Invertible sheaves):
- ;
- ;
- ,
with as in Degree of an invertible sheaf on a proper one-dimensional scheme and as in Euler characteristic of a coherent sheaf. The curve need not be reduced, irreducible or normal; closed subschemes of proper -schemes, in particular effective Cartier divisors on proper surfaces, are the intended instances.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: a field , a proper -scheme of dimension at most one, invertible -modules and , and the Axiom of Choice (The Axiom of Choice).
Set-up: is proper over , hence of finite type, so its affine charts are spectra of Noetherian rings and is locally Noetherian and quasi-compact, hence Noetherian (Proper morphisms, Locally Noetherian and Noetherian schemes, Every algebra of finite type over a Noetherian ring is a Noetherian ring). On the locally Noetherian a quasi-coherent module is coherent if and only if it is of finite type (Coherent sheaves on a locally Noetherian scheme, Coherent module sheaves), and is defined for every coherent ; in particular is defined on invertible modules (Euler characteristic of a coherent sheaf, Degree of an invertible sheaf on a proper one-dimensional scheme).
Exactness and coherence of twisting: tensoring with an invertible module is exact, and the tensor product of an invertible module with a coherent module is coherent; the unit isomorphism gives (Invertible sheaves, Locally free sheaves of finite rank, A sequence of abelian sheaves is exact exactly when it is exact on every stalk, Tensor product preserves quasi-coherence, The regular module is a tensor unit: and , Coherent module sheaves).
Euler characteristic is additive in short exact sequences of coherent modules on the proper -scheme (Euler characteristic is additive in short exact sequences).
Noetherian devissage (Noetherian devissage for coherent proper pushforward): a property of coherent -modules that holds for the zero module, satisfies the two-of-three property in every short exact sequence of coherent modules, and holds for a suitable witness on every integral closed subscheme of , holds for every coherent -module. The witnesses are modules with support in the subscheme whose generic stalk is annihilated by the maximal ideal and is one-dimensional over the residue field.
Integral closed subschemes of : an integral closed subscheme is nonempty, reduced and irreducible; since , either has dimension one, or is a single closed point (Integral schemes, Chain dimension and the empty-space convention, Closed immersions of schemes). Write for the closed immersion and for the generic point of ; then is a field, the structure sheaf is coherent on the locally Noetherian , and is coherent on , with annihilated by the maximal ideal of (Coherent module sheaves, Closed immersion preserves cohomology and coherent pushforward).
Projection formula and closed-immersion cohomology (Projection formula for a closed immersion and an invertible sheaf, Closed immersion preserves cohomology and coherent pushforward): for an invertible -module and a quasi-coherent -module there are isomorphisms and for all ; when is coherent, these isomorphisms also give .
Closed points: for a closed point of with residue field the pushforward is coherent, and for every invertible , so that (Euler characteristic of a closed point, and invariance under an invertible twist; Support of a module sheaf).
Integral curves: if is an integral closed subscheme of dimension one, then is an integral proper -scheme of dimension one, so for invertible modules on and coherent on one has with the rank of at the generic point; for invertible the rank is one, and , are invertible on (Twisting a coherent sheaf by an invertible sheaf on an integral proper curve, Degree of an invertible sheaf on a proper one-dimensional scheme).
Dual and tensor: canonically, so and statements about may be read off from the additive identity of statement 1 (Dual of a line bundle is its tensor inverse, Degree of an invertible sheaf on a proper one-dimensional scheme).
The Axiom of Choice enters through the Euler-characteristic, additivity, devissage and integral-curve suppliers [F3]–[F8]; the tensor computations below make no selection.
Proof
Set-up and defect. For a coherent -module the four tensor products appearing in are coherent by [F2], so all four Euler characteristics are defined; by [F2] , and it suffices for statements 1 and 3 to prove for the single coherent module .
Additivity of the defect. Let be a short exact sequence of coherent -modules. Tensoring with , with and with preserves exactness by [F2], so all four sequences appearing in are short exact with coherent terms, and [F3] gives for . Adding the untwisted and doubly twisted identities and subtracting the two singly twisted identities yields ; in particular has the two-of-three property, and .
Integral closed subschemes. By [F5] an integral closed subscheme is either a closed point or of dimension one; in both cases the witness pushed forward along is coherent on , has support contained in , generic stalk annihilated by the maximal ideal of , of dimension one over .
The closed-point case. If is a closed point, then and [F7] gives , because each of the twisted modules , and is isomorphic to .
The one-dimensional case. If has dimension one, then is an integral proper curve of dimension one over , and by the projection formula of [F6] applied to the invertible modules , , , and to , The modules and are invertible on , and has generic rank one; the integral-curve twist identity of [F8] applied on with invertible gives , and by definition of the degree. Substituting, the right-hand side vanishes.
Devissage and the additive identity. By steps 1.2, 2.1 and 2.2 the defect holds for the zero module, satisfies the two-of-three property, and vanishes on the witness of every integral closed subscheme ; the devissage lemma [F4] therefore gives for every coherent -module . Applying this to and using yields statement 3, and rearranging gives , which is statement 1 by the definition of .
Statement 2. Applying statement 1 of step 3.1 to the pair and using and of [F9] gives , hence .
Conclusion and choice accounting. Step 3.1 gives statements 1 and 3 and step 4.1 gives statement 2. The Axiom of Choice enters only through the suppliers recorded in [F10]: the Euler-characteristic additivity [F3], the devissage lemma [F4], the projection formula and closed-immersion cohomology [F6], the closed-point twist invariance [F7] and the integral-curve twist identity [F8]; the curve, the sheaves and the point arguments are given, and no selection is made in steps 1.1–3.1.
Intersection numbers of Cartier divisors on a smooth projective surface
Definition
Assume the Axiom of Choice, inherited from the Euler-characteristic supplier below (The Axiom of Choice). Let be a field and let be an integral (Integral schemes), regular (embedding dimension and regular local ring), projective (Projective morphisms before Proj) -scheme of pure dimension two (Chain dimension and the empty-space convention). A smooth projective surface over is an instance: for a finite-type -scheme, smoothness over makes every local ring regular (Smoothness over a field by geometric regularity), and a smooth projective surface is integral by hypothesis here.
The scheme is proper over (Projective morphisms are proper), integral, and of finite type over the field , hence locally Noetherian (Locally Noetherian and Noetherian schemes); the structure sheaf, its dual, all invertible sheaves (Invertible sheaves) and all their tensor products and duals are coherent -modules (Coherent module sheaves, Dual of a line bundle is its tensor inverse), so the Euler characteristic of Euler characteristic of a coherent sheaf is defined on all sheaves appearing below and takes values in .
The pairing on line bundles. For invertible -modules and define the tensor product being that of Tensor product of sheaves of modules.
The pairing on Cartier divisors. For Cartier divisors and on (Cartier divisor) with associated invertible sheaves and (Invertible sheaf of cartier divisor) define
Basic properties.
- Isomorphism invariance. The value depends only on the isomorphism classes of and : duals and tensor products are functorial under isomorphism (Dual of a line bundle is its tensor inverse, Tensor product of sheaves of modules) and the Euler characteristic is an invariant of isomorphism classes (Euler characteristic of a coherent sheaf). Hence the pairing is a well-defined map with the Picard group of Picard group of a scheme.
- Symmetry and the structure sheaf. The defining expression is symmetric in and , so . Substituting gives , and equally .
- Linear equivalence. If is linearly equivalent to and to , then and : linear equivalence of Cartier divisors is vanishing of the class in , and for the integral the rule induces an isomorphism (On an integral scheme, Cartier divisors modulo principal divisors compute the Picard group), with addition of divisors corresponding to tensor product (Addition of Cartier divisors is tensor product of their sheaves). By part 1 the value depends only on these isomorphism classes, so .
The pairing is studied in The surface intersection product is symmetric and bilinear, where it is proved to be a symmetric -bilinear form on ; for an effective Cartier divisor the restriction-degree identity of Intersection with a curve is the degree of the restriction identifies the value with the degree of a restricted line bundle, and The intersection matrix of a point blowup of a regular surface computes it on a point blowup.
The surface intersection product is symmetric and bilinear
Statement
Assume the Axiom of Choice (The Axiom of Choice). Let be a field, let be an integral regular projective surface over (Intersection numbers of Cartier divisors on a smooth projective surface) and let be invertible -modules (Invertible sheaves). Then consequently the intersection product is a symmetric -bilinear pairing and . Equivalently, for Cartier divisors on :
Facts & Assumptions
Given: a field , an integral regular projective surface over , invertible -modules , and Cartier divisors on .
The surface: is proper over (Projective morphisms are proper), integral, and of finite type over , hence Noetherian and locally Noetherian (Every algebra of finite type over a Noetherian ring is a Noetherian ring, Locally Noetherian and Noetherian schemes, Integral schemes); is defined on coherent modules and the intersection product on invertible modules and Cartier divisors is defined, symmetric in its two arguments, vanishes against , and depends only on the isomorphism classes of the line bundles, equivalently only on the linear equivalence classes of the divisors (Intersection numbers of Cartier divisors on a smooth projective surface).
Ample and very ample twists: fix a projective embedding of in the H-projective convention and let be the pullback of the twisting sheaf of projective space; then is H-very ample relative to , hence ample (Projective morphisms before Proj, Relative very ampleness in the finite projective-space convention, Relative very ampleness implies relative ampleness, Absolute ampleness by affine section opens).
Effective Cartier divisors: an effective Cartier divisor has invertible ideal sheaf , closed immersion , and short exact sequence ; twisting by an invertible gives (Effective cartier divisor, Invertible sheaf of cartier divisor, Effective Cartier divisors give a short exact sequence, Twisting the exact sequence of an effective Cartier divisor). Moreover is a proper -scheme of dimension at most one (A minimal prime over a principal nonzerodivisor has height one, Chain dimension and the empty-space convention, Projective morphisms are proper), so the degree and the quadratic identity of Degree is additive on invertible sheaves over a proper curve apply on .
Additivity of and the projection formula: for a short exact sequence of coherent modules on the Euler characteristic is additive (Euler characteristic is additive in short exact sequences), and for coherent on (Projection formula for a closed immersion and an invertible sheaf).
Global generation: since is projective over the Noetherian field with ample, for every coherent there is with globally generated for all (Eventual generation of coherent projective twists); on the integral nonempty a nonzero global section of an invertible sheaf is regular, and its zero scheme is an effective Cartier divisor with (A regular global section of an invertible sheaf glues to an effective Cartier divisor, Zero scheme of a line-bundle section).
Divisor dictionary on the integral surface: induces an isomorphism , so is linearly equivalent to exactly when , and , (On an integral scheme, Cartier divisors modulo principal divisors compute the Picard group, Addition of Cartier divisors is tensor product of their sheaves, Dual of a line bundle is its tensor inverse).
The Axiom of Choice is inherited through the properness and ampleness suppliers [F1]–[F2], the curve identity of [F3] (via devissage), the Euler-characteristic and cohomology suppliers of [F4], and eventual global generation in [F5]. The divisor dictionary [F6] uses no choice principle; the tensor computations below make no selection.
Proof
Set-up and the shift identity. For invertible modules write for the defining expression , so that ; for an effective Cartier divisor write and set for invertible , so that by the twisting sequence, additivity of and the projection formula. Expanding the four terms and using gives and substituting the right-hand side becomes the negative of , which vanishes by part 3 of Degree is additive on invertible sheaves over a proper curve applied to the proper curve and the invertible sheaves , . Hence for every effective Cartier divisor . The defining expression is symmetric, , and depends only on isomorphism classes; writing for Cartier divisors, the divisor dictionary shows that depends only on the linear equivalence classes of and .
Differences of effective divisors. Every Cartier divisor on is linearly equivalent to a difference of effective Cartier divisors: since is projective over the Noetherian field and is ample, there is an integer for which both and are globally generated; choosing nonzero global sections and and using that is integral, the zero schemes and are effective Cartier divisors with and , so and is linearly equivalent to .
Effective additivity. Let be an effective Cartier divisor and let be Cartier divisors. By the shift identity of step 1.1 and the dictionary of [F6], . In particular, for effective the identity holds by taking and .
Additivity in the second variable. Let be arbitrary Cartier divisors and choose, by step 1.2, effective with linearly equivalent to . Then is linearly equivalent to , and to ; since the values of depend only on linear equivalence classes, applying step 2.1 twice with the effective divisors gives while applying step 2.1 to each pair gives . Substituting and cancelling yields for all Cartier divisors .
Additivity in the first variable and vanishing at zero. The defining expression is symmetric in its two arguments, so by step 3.1 applied with first argument ; hence is additive in each variable, and because and .
Translation to line bundles and conclusion. Since is integral, every invertible sheaf on is isomorphic to for a Cartier divisor , well defined modulo linear equivalence; under this dictionary tensor products and duals of line bundles correspond to sums and negatives of divisors, and depends only on the classes. Hence the divisor identities of steps 2.1, 3.1 and 4.1 translate into for all invertible : the intersection product is a symmetric -bilinear pairing . The Axiom of Choice enters only through the suppliers of [F7], in particular the eventual global generation of [F5], the Euler-characteristic additivity and projection formula of [F4] and the curve identity of [F3] used in step 1.1; the two sections chosen in step 1.2 are single sections of specific sheaves, not a family, and no further selection is made.
Intersection with a curve is the degree of the restriction
Statement
Assume the Axiom of Choice (The Axiom of Choice). Let be a field, let be an integral regular projective surface over (Intersection numbers of Cartier divisors on a smooth projective surface) and let and be effective Cartier divisors on (Effective cartier divisor, Cartier divisor) with associated line bundles and (Invertible sheaf of cartier divisor). Then where is the intersection product of Intersection numbers of Cartier divisors on a smooth projective surface and is the degree of Degree of an invertible sheaf on a proper one-dimensional scheme on the proper curves and .
More generally, if only is assumed effective, then the first identity holds for every Cartier divisor on , with taken on the curve . If is moreover a smooth proper geometrically integral curve, then agrees with the closed-point divisor degree of Degree divisor proper curve on . The empty curve case is included: both sides are then .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: a field , an integral regular projective surface over , an effective Cartier divisor , and a Cartier divisor on .
Effective Cartier divisors and closed immersions: an effective Cartier divisor is given by local equations that are nonzerodivisors, its ideal sheaf is invertible, the inclusion is a closed immersion, and there is a short exact sequence with invertible (Effective cartier divisor, Invertible sheaf of cartier divisor, Effective Cartier divisors give a short exact sequence, Closed immersions of schemes).
The curve is a proper -scheme of dimension at most one: its irreducible components are minimal primes over the principal ideals cut out by local equations of , hence have height one by the principal ideal theorem, so (A minimal prime over a principal nonzerodivisor has height one, Chain dimension and the empty-space convention); is a closed subscheme of the proper -scheme , hence proper over (Proper morphisms). The degree is therefore defined on invertible -modules (Degree of an invertible sheaf on a proper one-dimensional scheme), and is Noetherian, locally Noetherian and of finite type over (Locally Noetherian and Noetherian schemes).
Twisting the exact sequence of [F1] by an invertible -module gives a short exact sequence with and (Twisting the exact sequence of an effective Cartier divisor); the Euler characteristic is additive in short exact sequences of coherent modules on the proper -scheme (Euler characteristic is additive in short exact sequences), and the closed-immersion projection formula identifies for coherent on (Projection formula for a closed immersion and an invertible sheaf). Hence for every invertible .
Definition of the values: writing and and , the definition of the intersection product gives and for invertible ; the defining expression is symmetric in the two divisors (Intersection numbers of Cartier divisors on a smooth projective surface). By part 2 of Degree is additive on invertible sheaves over a proper curve, for invertible on the proper curve of dimension at most one.
The smooth case: if is a smooth proper geometrically integral curve over and is an invertible -module, then for a divisor on (Cartier and Weil divisors agree on a smooth curve), and (Riemann-Roch in Euler-characteristic form: the degree shift); hence equals the closed-point divisor degree of Degree divisor proper curve.
Empty case: if then and , so the defining expression for is (Effective cartier divisor, Effective Cartier divisors give a short exact sequence).
The Axiom of Choice enters through the Euler-characteristic, devissage, closed-immersion and curve-degree suppliers; no selection is made in the computations below.
Proof
Set-up. The curve is a proper -scheme of dimension at most one, so is defined on invertible -modules, and the modules and , , appearing below are invertible, hence coherent on the locally Noetherian schemes and . In the closed-immersion exact sequence for the third term is , and for an invertible on the twist reads .
The chi-difference identity. For every invertible -module , additivity of on the twisted sequence of [F1] gives , and the projection formula gives ; hence .
The smooth comparison. If is a smooth proper geometrically integral curve, then every invertible module on is for a divisor , and the Euler-characteristic degree shift identifies with ; this is the asserted agreement with the closed-point divisor degree.
The empty case. If , then the ideal sheaf of is and , so the four terms of the defining expression cancel in pairs and ; on the empty curve every degree is .
The main computation. Take the identity of step 1.2 for and for : the second because . Substituting both into the defining expression of [F4], By [F4] applied on , , and by the dual-degree identity of [F4], because . Therefore , the first identity, valid for every Cartier divisor once is effective.
Both divisors effective. Assume now that is effective as well. Applying step 2.1 with the roles of and interchanged gives , and the defining expression of the intersection product is symmetric by [F4], so . Together with step 2.1 this gives the two asserted identities for effective and .
Conclusion and choice accounting. Step 2.1 proves the general identity for effective and arbitrary Cartier ; step 3.1 adds the second identity when is effective; step 1.3 proves the agreement of with the closed-point divisor degree on a smooth proper geometrically integral curve; and step 1.4 covers the empty curve. The Axiom of Choice enters only through the suppliers listed in [F7], in particular the Euler-characteristic additivity and projection formula of [F3], the degree and dual-degree statements of [F4] and the curve-degree comparison [F5]; no selection is made in the computations.
The intersection matrix of a point blowup of a regular surface
Statement
Assume the Axiom of Choice (The Axiom of Choice). Let be a field, let be an integral regular projective surface over (Intersection numbers of Cartier divisors on a smooth projective surface), let be a closed point with residue field and , let be the blowup of at (Blowup of a scheme along an ideal sheaf) and let be the exceptional curve (Exceptional subscheme of a blowup). Then:
- is an integral regular projective surface over , is an effective Cartier divisor, is isomorphic to , and ; consequently .
- For all Cartier divisors on (Cartier divisor): and ; in particular .
- If is a reduced effective Cartier divisor on through with multiplicity (Effective cartier divisor) and strict transform (Strict transform of a closed subscheme), then , and . If then and .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: a field , an integral regular projective surface over , a closed point with residue field and residue degree , the blowup and the exceptional curve , and the Axiom of Choice (The Axiom of Choice).
Blowup interfaces: for the ideal sheaf of the closed point , with structural morphism and relative twists (Blowup of a scheme along an ideal sheaf); is the scheme-theoretic inverse image of the center, a closed subscheme with ideal (Exceptional subscheme of a blowup); is an isomorphism over and is the complement of that open subscheme (The blowup is an isomorphism off the center); and is proper and locally H-projective, and globally H-projective as soon as the ideal is generated by finitely many global sections (Blowups of finite type ideals are locally H-projective, and proper).
Integrality and regularity of : since is integral and is a nonzero ideal of finite type, is integral and is birational (Blowing up a nonzero ideal on an integral scheme is birational); and since is a regular finite-type -scheme of pure dimension two and is a closed point, is regular of pure dimension two, is an effective Cartier divisor isomorphic to , and (Point blowups of regular surfaces stay regular, with rational exceptional fibre over the residue field); alternatively for the regular immersion (Regular centers have projective-bundle exceptional divisors, The normal bundle of the exceptional curve is O(-1)).
Projective embeddings: an ample twist of the coherent point ideal on is globally generated (Eventual generation of coherent projective twists, Global generation by the evaluation map). The graded algebra has the same relative Proj as for invertible (Invariance of the blowup under invertible (fractional) rescaling of the ideal). A graded quotient of gives a closed subscheme of (Relative Proj of a graded quasi-coherent algebra, Closed subschemes of projective space and saturated ideals). Closed immersions are preserved by base change (Closed immersions are affine quotients and survive base change). The closed point of a finite-type scheme over has finite residue degree (A maximal ideal of an affine algebra has finite residue field over the base field).
Cohomology of line bundles on the exceptional curve: for over and an invertible sheaf on of degree over , , where ; in particular , and for of degree one has and (Euler characteristic of line bundles on a projective line over a finite field extension, Degree of an invertible sheaf on a proper one-dimensional scheme).
Pushforward and projection formula: and for every (Pushforward and vanishing for point blowups on a surface); consequently for every invertible -module (Projection formula for invertible twists, Euler characteristic of a coherent sheaf).
Effective divisors, twists and transforms: for an effective Cartier divisor on a surface, the sequence is exact for invertible (Effective Cartier divisors give a short exact sequence, Twisting the exact sequence of an effective Cartier divisor); the total transform of a Cartier divisor is the pullback Cartier divisor with (Total transform of a Cartier divisor, Pullback of a Cartier divisor, Pullback of a Cartier divisor computes the pullback of its line bundle); and for a reduced effective Cartier divisor on the regular surface through with multiplicity , the total transform decomposes as with the strict transform, which is reduced (Total transform equals strict transform plus multiplicity times the exceptional divisor, Strict transform of a closed subscheme, The reduction of a scheme).
The intersection product of Intersection numbers of Cartier divisors on a smooth projective surface is symmetric and -bilinear on the Picard group of an integral regular projective surface, and the restriction theorem identifies for effective (The surface intersection product is symmetric and bilinear, Intersection with a curve is the degree of the restriction); degrees, and with them intersection numbers, are additive on the proper curve (Degree is additive on invertible sheaves over a proper curve).
The Axiom of Choice enters through the blowup, sheaf-cohomology, global-generation and Euler-characteristic suppliers above; the points and divisors appearing below are given data.
Proof
The ideal of is a nonzero coherent ideal on the integral regular projective surface . Thus the blowup is integral, regular and pure of dimension two; is effective Cartier, isomorphic to , with normal line bundle . The residue degree is finite. To apply the intersection theory, we also verify absolute projectivity. Choose and its ample hyperplane bundle . For some , , , is globally generated. A finite set of its global sections generates it: choose finitely many sections spanning each of finitely many affine neighborhoods, possible since is quasi-compact and the sheaf is of finite type.
Put . The preceding sections yield a graded surjection , since is generated in degree one. Its relative Proj is canonically by invertible rescaling; the twist need not be an ordinary ideal. Hence is a closed subscheme of . Base change of embeds the latter as a closed subscheme of .
The product has a closed Segre embedding into : its coordinates are , and the defining equations are all rank-one minors . On , these equations identify its coordinate ring with the polynomial ring on () and (); all other coordinates are their products. This is exactly the product of the affine charts and , and the identifications respect their ratio transitions. They glue to the closed embedding. Thus is projective over , and all intersection and proper-cohomology hypotheses are satisfied.
By the exceptional-curve Euler formula, and , so its degree over is . Restriction of the intersection product to the effective curve gives . For any Cartier divisor on , factors through , since the pulled-back point ideal vanishes on . The restriction of is therefore trivial. Its degree is zero, and the restriction formula gives . This formula allows arbitrary ; only must be effective.
Pushforward vanishing and the projection formula give for every invertible . Pullback respects tensor products and duals. Apply this equality to the four sheaves , , , and their tensor product in the defining Euler-characteristic expression for intersection. The result is , including the self-intersection case.
For the reduced curve through , the proved point formula gives . Orthogonality and symmetry imply , hence . Bilinearity and step 4.2 give , so . If , a local equation is a unit near ; its pullback misses , and the off-center isomorphism gives . The same pullback identity yields . Choice enters only through the recorded suppliers.
5 · Examples, counterexamples and false statements
None yet.
Sources
- The Stacks Project, Varieties, Section 33.44 (Degrees on curves)
- Ravi Vakil, The Rising Sea: Foundations of Algebraic Geometry, pre-publication version 2025-10-21
- The Stacks Project, Cohomology, Section 20.54 (tag 01E6)
- The Stacks Project, Varieties, Section 33.33 (tag 0BEI)
- The Stacks Project, Varieties, Section 33.44 (Degrees on curves), Lemma 33.44.5 (tag 0AYV)
- The Stacks Project, Cohomology of Schemes, Lemma 30.12.6 (tag 01YI), devissage of coherent sheaves
- The Stacks Project, Varieties, Section 33.44 (Degrees on curves), Lemma 33.44.7 (tag 0AYX)
- The Stacks Project, Varieties, Section 33.45 (Numerical intersections)
- The Stacks Project, Divisors, Section 31.33 (tag 01OF)
- The Stacks Project, More on Morphisms, Section 37.17 (tag 0H1G)