Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedprecheck passaudited 2026-08-16
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Associativity of tensor products for compatible bimodules

Statement

Let M be a right R-module, let RNS be an (R,S)-bimodule, and let P be a left S-module. There is a canonical group isomorphism

αM,N,P:(M⊗RN)⊗SP⟶M⊗R(N⊗SP)

determined by

αM,N,P((m⊗n)⊗p)=m⊗(n⊗p).

It respects any compatible outer module actions and is natural in M,N,P.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A right R-module M, an (R,S)-bimodule N, and a left S-module P.

[L1]

The outer actions make M⊗RN a right S-module and N⊗SP a left R-module, with the stated elementary-tensor formulas (A commuting outer scalar action descends to a tensor product).

[L2]

Balanced pairings induce unique homomorphisms from tensor products (Universal property of the tensor product for balanced maps into abelian groups).

[L3]

A formula on elementary tensors descends exactly when its underlying pairing is balanced (A formula on elementary tensors defines a homomorphism exactly when its underlying pairing is balanced).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1givenL1L2L3

For fixed p∈P, the pairing (m,n)↦m⊗(n⊗p) is R-balanced: (mr,n) and (m,rn) have the same image by the outer left R-action in [L1]. Thus [L2] and [L3] give a homomorphism ap:M⊗RN→M⊗R(N⊗SP).

1.2givenL1L2L3

For fixed m∈M, the pairing (n,p)↦(m⊗n)⊗p is S-balanced, so [L2] and [L3] give bm:N⊗SP→(M⊗RN)⊗SP.

2.1step 1.1L1L2L3

The pairing (x,p)↦ap(x) from (M⊗RN)×P is S-balanced. On generators, ap((m⊗n)s)=m⊗((ns)⊗p)=m⊗(n⊗sp)=asp(m⊗n) by [L1], and additivity extends the equality to every x. Hence [L2] gives αM,N,P with the displayed formula.

2.2step 1.2L1L2L3

The pairing (m,y)↦bm(y) is R-balanced. It is enough to check generators y=n⊗p, where bmr(n⊗p)=((mr)⊗n)⊗p=(m⊗rn)⊗p=bm((rn)⊗p)=bm(r(n⊗p)) by [L1]. Therefore [L2] gives β:M⊗R(N⊗SP)→(M⊗RN)⊗SP.

3.1step 2.1step 2.2L2

The composite βα fixes every tensor (m⊗n)⊗p, and αβ fixes every tensor m⊗(n⊗p); successive applications of uniqueness in [L2] show that these composites are the identity maps.

3.2step 2.1step 2.2L1L2

The same elementary-tensor calculation shows compatibility with any outer actions, and replacing m,n,p by their images under compatible homomorphisms proves naturality because both candidate composites agree on all elementary tensors.

4.1step 3.1step 3.2∎

Thus αM,N,P is the asserted canonical natural isomorphism with inverse β.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

10 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources