Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck passaudited 2026-09-27
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Graded associativity, units, and internal-shift tensor isomorphisms

Statement

Let R,S be graded k-algebras and let B,C be graded k-algebras; let M be a graded (B,R)-bimodule, N a graded (R,S)-bimodule and P a graded (S,C)-bimodule.

  1. The balanced associator αM,N,P:(M⊗RN)⊗SP⟶M⊗R(N⊗SP),αM,N,P((m⊗n)⊗p)=m⊗(n⊗p), is an isomorphism of graded abelian groups, natural in M,N,P and compatible with the outer actions that make both sides graded (B,C)-bimodules.

  2. For every graded left R-module N and graded right R-module M the tensor-unit maps λN:R⊗RN→N, r⊗n↦rn, and ρM:M⊗RR→M, m⊗r↦mr, are degree-zero isomorphisms, compatible with outer actions.

  3. For all r,s∈Z, the identity on elementary tensors induces a degree-zero isomorphism M{r}⊗RN{s}  ≅  (M⊗RN){r+s}, natural in M and N and compatible with outer actions.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Graded k-algebras B,C,R,S; a graded (B,R)-bimodule M, a graded (R,S)-bimodule N and a graded (S,C)-bimodule P; integers r,s.

[L1]

Graded modules, degree-zero maps, graded submodules and internal shifts are defined in Associative graded algebras, bimodules, and internal shifts.

[L2]

The balanced tensor product is graded by total internal degree on homogeneous elementary tensors, and outer actions make it a graded module (Graded balanced tensor product and homogeneous Hom).

[L3]

The balanced associator is a canonical isomorphism, respects compatible outer actions and is natural (Associativity of tensor products for compatible bimodules).

[L4]

The tensor-unit maps λN and ρM are group isomorphisms with inverses n↦1R⊗n and m↦m⊗1R, and they respect outer module structures (The regular module is a tensor unit: R⊗RN≅N and M⊗RR≅M).

[L5]

A balanced pairing induces a unique homomorphism out of the tensor product (Universal property of the tensor product for balanced maps into abelian groups), and the outer actions are the unique ones with (m⊗n)s=m⊗(ns) and s(m⊗n)=(sm)⊗n (A commuting outer scalar action descends to a tensor product).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

Let X,Y be graded abelian groups and f:X→Y a bijective degree-zero homomorphism. Then f is an isomorphism of graded abelian groups, i.e. f−1 is degree-zero: for y∈Yd write y=f(x) with x=∑exe the finite homogeneous decomposition, so y=∑ef(xe) with f(xe)∈Ye; uniqueness of the homogeneous decomposition in Y gives f(xd)=y and f(xe)=0 for e≠d, hence x=xd∈Xd.

L1algebra
2.1

For homogeneous m∈Mi, n∈Nj, p∈Pl the tensor (m⊗n)⊗p has degree (i+j)+l and m⊗(n⊗p) has degree i+(j+l), the same integer, so αM,N,P carries the homogeneous part of degree d into degree d on elementary tensors and, being additive, on all of (M⊗RN)⊗SP. It is a bijective group homomorphism by [L3], so step 1.1 makes it a degree-zero isomorphism; its naturality and compatibility with outer actions are those of the published associator.

step 1.1L2L3
2.2

For homogeneous r∈Ri and n∈Nj one has λN(r⊗n)=rn∈Ni+j, so λN is degree-zero, and it is bijective by [L4]; step 1.1 makes it a degree-zero isomorphism, and its compatibility with outer actions is the published one. The same computation with ρM(m⊗r)=mr∈Mi+j for m∈Mi treats ρM.

step 1.1L2L4
2.3

The pairing M{r}×N{s}→(M⊗RN){r+s}, (x,y)↦x⊗y, is balanced with respect to R: the underlying R-actions of M{r} and N{s} are those of M and N, so (xa)⊗y and x⊗(ay) are equal in M⊗RN; it is additive in each variable. By [L5] it induces a group homomorphism φ with φ(x⊗y)=x⊗y. For x∈(M{r})i=Mi−r and y∈(N{s})j=Nj−s the element x⊗y lies in (M⊗RN)i+j−r−s=((M⊗RN){r+s})i+j, so φ is degree-zero, and the same construction in the reverse direction gives ψ with ψ(x⊗y)=x⊗y; the two composites fix all elementary tensors and hence are identities. By step 1.1, φ is a degree-zero isomorphism.

step 1.1L2L5algebra
3.1

The outer actions on both sides of φ are the unique actions with the elementary-tensor formulas of [L5], and the shifts change no action, so φ is compatible with the outer actions; it is natural because it is induced from the universal property of the pairing of underlying modules.

step 2.3L2L5
4.1

Collecting steps 2.1, 2.2, 2.3 and 3.1: the associator, the two unit maps and the shift comparison are degree-zero isomorphisms of graded modules, with the naturality and outer-action compatibility stated.

step 2.1step 2.2step 2.3step 3.1
5.1

Therefore the ordinary balanced associator and unit maps are degree-zero graded isomorphisms, and the identity on elementary tensors induces the natural degree-zero isomorphism M{r}⊗RN{s}≅(M⊗RN){r+s} compatible with outer actions.

step 4.1∎

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

15 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources