Alphabeta Math
DefinitionDefinition: Literature-sourcedProof: Not applicablePipeline-generatedaudited 2026-09-27
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Graded balanced tensor product and homogeneous Hom

Definition

Total internal degree on the balanced tensor product. Let A be a graded k-algebra, M a graded right A-module and N a graded left A-module (Associative graded algebras, bimodules, and internal shifts). First use the canonical decomposition of the ordinary tensor product of the underlying abelian groups M⊗ZN≅⨁i,j∈ZMi⊗ZNj. Its inverse sends m⊗n to the finite sum ∑i,jmi⊗nj, where m=∑imi and n=∑jnj are their homogeneous decompositions; the two maps are inverse because they agree with the identity on homogeneous elementary tensors. Give the summand Mi⊗ZNj total degree i+j, and write Gd:=⨁i+j=dMi⊗ZNj.

The balanced tensor product M⊗AN=(M⊗ZN)/RA (The tensor product M⊗RN from the additive group underlying the free Z-module on M×N, elementary tensors, and finite tensor sums), where RA is generated by the balance relations (ma)⊗n−m⊗(an). These relations are generated by the homogeneous ones: for m=∑imi, a=∑ℓaℓ and n=∑jnj, the relation is the finite sum of (miaℓ)⊗nj−mi⊗(aℓnj) over i,ℓ,j. Each such homogeneous relation belongs to Gi+ℓ+j, since the two module actions preserve total degree. Thus RA=⨁d(RA∩Gd), and

M⊗AN=⨁d∈Z(M⊗AN)d,(M⊗AN)d:=(Gd+RA)/RA,

is a graded abelian group. For homogeneous m∈Mi and n∈Nj the elementary tensor m⊗n has total internal degree i+j; every tensor is a finite sum of homogeneous elementary tensors, and the balancing relations used in the quotient are homogeneous. This grading is the only grading used below, and it introduces no sign.

Outer actions. If M is a graded (B,A)-bimodule and N a graded left A-module, then the action b(m⊗n):=(bm)⊗n of A commuting outer scalar action descends to a tensor product makes M⊗AN a graded left B-module: the action is homogeneous because homogeneous b∈Bl sends m⊗n of degree i+j to an element of degree l+i+j. Symmetrically, if N is a graded (A,C)-bimodule, the action (m⊗n)c:=m⊗(nc) makes M⊗AN a graded right C-module, and the two outer actions commute when both are present.

Homogeneous Hom. For graded left A-modules P,Q, with Hom⁡Aungr(P,Q) the abelian group of all A-linear maps P→Q, put

Hom⁡A,d(P,Q):={f∈Hom⁡Aungr(P,Q)∣f(Pi)⊆Qi+d for all i∈Z},HOM⁡A(P,Q):=⨁d∈ZHom⁡A,d(P,Q).

Each Hom⁡A,d(P,Q) is a subgroup of Hom⁡Aungr(P,Q), and the sum is direct: if f=∑dfd=∑dfd′ with fd,fd′∈Hom⁡A,d, then for p∈Pi the element f(p) has homogeneous components fd(p)∈Qi+d, and comparison of the graded components in Q gives fd(p)=fd′(p) for every d and p, so fd=fd′. Thus HOM⁡A(P,Q) is a graded abelian group whose degree-d part is Hom⁡A,d(P,Q), and the degree-zero morphisms are Hom⁡A,0(P,Q). By definition HOM⁡A(P,Q) consists of the finite sums of homogeneous A-linear maps, so HOM⁡A(P,Q)⊆Hom⁡Aungr(P,Q) with equality only when every A-linear map has bounded spread in degree.

The associative left action. If M is a graded (B,A)-bimodule and Y a graded left B-module, then HOM⁡B(M,Y) carries a left A-module structure

(a⋅f)(m):=f(ma)(a∈A, m∈M),

which is homogeneous: for a∈Ai and f∈Hom⁡B,d(M,Y) one has ma∈Ml+i for m∈Ml, hence (a⋅f)(m)∈Yl+i+d and a⋅f∈Hom⁡B,d+i(M,Y). The action is associative and unital by the module axioms of M, so HOM⁡B(M,Y) is a graded left A-module and an object of GrMod⁡0(A). The same formula defines an action on the full ungraded Hom⁡ group, where it is denoted by the same symbol.

Remark

HOM⁡A(P,Q) need not be all of Hom⁡Aungr(P,Q). Let k be a field, A=k[x] with deg⁡x=1, and Q=A; let P=⨁j≥0A{−j} with generator uj:=1A∈A{−j}, an element of degree −j, and define the A-linear map

f:P⟶A,f(uj):=x2j(j≥0).

For each j the map fj that sends uj to x2j and every other ul to 0 is A-linear and homogeneous of degree 3j: it kills all pieces A{−l}d with l≠j, and on A{−j}d=Ad+j it sends auj to ax2j∈Ad+3j. The pointwise sum ∑jfj equals f, because every element of P has finite support, but it is not a finite sum: if f=∑t∈Tgt with T finite and gt homogeneous of degree t, then evaluating at uj gives x2j=∑tgt(uj) with gt(uj)∈At−j, and since x2j is a nonzero homogeneous element of A of degree 2j the only contribution comes from t−j=2j. Hence g3j(uj)=x2j≠0 for every j≥0, so T would have to contain the infinitely many distinct degrees 3j, contradicting finiteness. Therefore f∉HOM⁡A(P,A), and the inclusion HOM⁡A(P,Q)⊆Hom⁡Aungr(P,Q) is proper in general.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

14 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources