How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Graded modules with degree-zero maps form an abelian category
Statement
For any unital associative -graded algebra , the category of graded left -modules and degree-zero maps is abelian. Kernels, images, cokernels and finite biproducts are computed in each homogeneous degree; a sequence is exact precisely when it is exact degreewise.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A unital associative -graded algebra , graded left -modules and degree-zero -linear maps as specified in the steps below.
Graded modules, degree-zero maps, graded submodules with pieces and the category are defined in Associative graded algebras, bimodules, and internal shifts.
An additive category is a preadditive category with all finite biproducts, equivalently one with a zero object and binary biproducts (Additive category); an abelian category is an additive category in which every morphism has a kernel and a cokernel and the canonical comparison is an isomorphism (Abelian category).
For a module homomorphism , both and are submodules, and the cokernel is the quotient by the image (Kernels and images of module homomorphisms are submodules, and injectivity is equivalent to trivial kernel, Module homomorphism and isomorphism, kernel, image and cokernel).
A module homomorphism vanishing on a submodule factors uniquely through the quotient (A module homomorphism vanishing on factors uniquely through ).
The first isomorphism theorem gives by (First isomorphism theorem for modules: ).
A family of homomorphisms out of the summands of a direct sum determines a unique homomorphism out of the direct sum, and elements of a direct sum have finite support (Universal property of a direct sum of modules, The direct sum of an indexed family of modules).
Proof
Pointwise addition makes an abelian group: a sum of degree-zero -linear maps is degree-zero and -linear, and composition is additive in each variable, so is preadditive.
The zero module , with all homogeneous pieces zero, is a zero object of : for every graded the unique maps and are -linear and degree-zero, since the only element of lies in the zero piece for every .
For graded modules put ; then and , so is a graded -module, and the coordinate inclusions and projections are degree-zero -linear and satisfy , , , and , because the sum of a summand in and one in is the unique decomposition of its sum in .
Let be degree-zero and let be its restriction. Then : if and is the finite decomposition of into homogeneous components, then with , so every by uniqueness of homogeneous decomposition, and conversely each lies in . Hence is a graded submodule, its inclusion into is degree-zero, and any degree-zero with takes values in , so the inclusion is a kernel in .
The module is a coproduct and a product in . Given degree-zero maps and , [L6] produces the unique additive map , which satisfies both composite identities, is -linear and sends into , hence is degree-zero; given degree-zero maps and , the map is degree-zero -linear and is the unique map with the two required composites. Thus is a binary biproduct.
Similarly : the image of is the sum of the images of the restrictions, and every lies in , so these pieces are the homogeneous pieces of a graded submodule of .
Steps 1.1, 1.2 and 2.1 give an abelian-group enrichment with bilinear composition, a zero object and binary biproducts, so is an additive category.
Put with pieces . This is a graded -module, the quotient map is degree-zero -linear, and . Any degree-zero with kills and so factors uniquely through by [L4]; the resulting map is degree-zero because is surjective in each degree. Hence is a cokernel and , being , is the categorical image of .
For degree-zero maps with one has and by steps 1.4 and 2.2. Since a graded submodule is determined by its homogeneous pieces, holds if and only if for every ; applied at each position of a sequence, exactness is equivalent to exactness degreewise.
The coimage is with pieces , a graded module by the same argument as step 3.2, and the canonical comparison sends to . On degree it is the map of [L5], an isomorphism of -modules; it is -linear and degree-zero, and a degree-zero bijection of graded modules has degree-zero inverse, so the comparison is an isomorphism in .
Steps 3.1, 1.4, 3.2 and 4.1 exhibit an additive category in which every morphism has a kernel and a cokernel and the canonical coimage-to-image comparison is an isomorphism; by [L2] the category is abelian.
Steps 5.1 and 3.3 give both assertions: is abelian, and its kernels, images, cokernels, finite biproducts and exactness are computed degreewise.
Depends on
- Associative graded algebras, bimodules, and internal shifts
- Abelian category
- Additive category
- First isomorphism theorem for modules: $M/\ker f\cong\operatorname{im}f$
- Kernels and images of module homomorphisms are submodules, and injectivity is equivalent to trivial kernel
- Module homomorphism and isomorphism, kernel, image and cokernel
- A module homomorphism vanishing on $N$ factors uniquely through $M/N$
- Universal property of a direct sum of modules
- The direct sum of an indexed family of modules
Used by
- Finite graded Aₘ-modules, internal shifts and the vertex projectives Definition
- Finite graded projective modules Definition
- The vertex modules Sᵢ and their prime quotients Definition
- A left-projective tensor bimodule need not be right-flat Example
- The graded horseshoe lemma for finite graded projective resolutions Lemma
- Restriction and extension along a graded algebra map Proposition
- Bimodule tensor exactness and preservation of finite projectives have separate hypotheses Theorem
- Finite graded projectives are finite shifted-free summands Theorem
Dependency tree · two levels
27 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Alexander Kleshchev, Representation Theory of Symmetric Groups and Related Hecke Algebras (2009), §2.2, printed pp. 6-7 (standard reference, not scraped)
- Stacks Project, Algebra, §10.56, tag 00JL (standard reference, not scraped)