How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Universal property of a direct sum of modules
Statement
Let be left -modules and a left -module. For every family of homomorphisms , there is a unique homomorphism such that for every . It is given by For , this is the unique map .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A family of left -modules, a left -module , and homomorphisms .
Elements of have finite support, and is the coordinate inclusion (The direct sum of an indexed family of modules).
A module homomorphism preserves addition and scalar multiplication (Module homomorphism and isomorphism, kernel, image and cokernel).
Proof
Define ; the sum is finite by [F1], and padding it by zero terms shows it is independent of the chosen finite set containing the support.
Addition and scalar multiplication may be checked on the finite union of the relevant supports, so [F2] gives and .
For , step 1.1 gives , so .
Every equals the finite sum . Hence any homomorphism satisfying has and therefore equals .
If , the direct sum is by [F1], the formula is the empty sum, and the construction and uniqueness still apply. Thus the universal property holds for every index set.
Depends on
Used by
- Localisation commutes with finite intersections of submodules Corollary
- Localised Hom can fail without finite presentation of the source Example
- Graded modules with degree-zero maps form an abelian category Lemma
- A module-valued coend is the direct sum of the diagonal values modulo the dinaturality submodule Theorem
- Direct sums of projectives are projective, and module categories have enough projectives Theorem
- Endomorphisms of a finite direct sum are matrices of Hom-groups Theorem
- Equivalent characterizations of semisimple modules Theorem
- Tensor products commute with arbitrary direct sums Theorem
- The splitting lemma for short exact sequences of modules Theorem
- Universal property of the free module on a set Theorem
- Universal property of the tensor algebra Theorem
Dependency tree · two levels
6 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- A. Kleshchev, Lectures on Abstract Algebra for Graduate Students, sections 3.6, 3.14, and 3.15 (standard reference, not scraped)
- The Stacks Project, Algebra (standard reference, not scraped)
- P. Hekmati, Homological Algebra, section 3.1 (standard reference, not scraped)