How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
A module-valued coend is the direct sum of the diagonal values modulo the dinaturality submodule
Statement
Let be a unital ring, let be a small category (Small, locally small, and large categories) and let be a functor (Left modules over a fixed ring and module homomorphisms form the large locally small category ). Write for the coordinate inclusions of the direct sum (The direct sum of an indexed family of modules) and let
be the submodule generated by those elements (Submodule of a module, Generated submodule, cyclic and finitely generated modules, module basis and free module).
Then has a coend, and it is the direct sum of the diagonal values modulo the dinaturality submodule (The end and the coend of a functor , Quotient module with scalar multiplication on additive cosets):
where is the quotient homomorphism. As in the set-valued case, the generating element lies in the off-diagonal value , and the two terms of the generator sit in the summands at and at respectively.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A unital ring , a small category , and a functor from to left -modules.
For a fixed ring , left -modules and module homomorphisms form a large locally small category (Left modules over a fixed ring and module homomorphisms form the large locally small category ).
A category is small when both and are sets. (Small, locally small, and large categories).
The direct sum is the submodule of the direct product consisting of the families of finite support, with coordinate inclusions ; If , both product and direct sum are the zero module. (The direct sum of an indexed family of modules).
A subset is a submodule when it is a subgroup of the additive group of and is closed under scalars: (Submodule of a module).
The submodule generated by is , the smallest submodule of containing (Generated submodule, cyclic and finitely generated modules, module basis and free module).
For the quotient module has the cosets as elements and scalar action (Quotient module with scalar multiplication on additive cosets).
For every family of homomorphisms there is a unique homomorphism such that for every . It is given by the finite sum of the over the support (Universal property of a direct sum of modules).
If is a homomorphism and satisfies , there is a unique homomorphism such that , equivalently (A module homomorphism vanishing on factors uniquely through ).
A cowedge from to is a dinatural transformation from to a constant functor: a family with for every (Wedges and cowedges, and the categories they form).
An end of is a terminal object of the category of wedges over and a coend an initial object of the category of cowedges under ; in short, an end is a terminal wedge and a coend an initial cowedge (The end and the coend of a functor ).
Proof
Since is small its objects form a set, so is a set-indexed family of left -modules and the direct sum with its coordinate inclusions is formed.
The displayed generating elements lie in , so is the smallest submodule containing them, and with quotient homomorphism is a left -module. The construction is carried out here rather than obtained from a general cocompleteness theorem, which would assert that the coend exists without exhibiting it.
The family is a cowedge from to : for and the difference is applied to a generator of , hence zero, and each is a homomorphism because the coordinate inclusion and the quotient map are.
Let be any cowedge. By [L1] there is a unique homomorphism with ; the cowedge equations for the family make every displayed generator lie in , and is a submodule, so by [F2]. By [L2] there is a unique with , hence with for every ; and any homomorphism with satisfies , so by the uniqueness in [L1] and by the uniqueness in [L2]. So is an initial cowedge, that is a coend of .
If is empty the index set is empty, so by [F1] the direct sum is the zero module, the generating set is empty, is the zero submodule and is the zero module; step 4.1 then says the zero module is the initial cowedge, which is correct because a cowedge under the empty family is just an object and the zero module is initial in . This is the asserted presentation of the coend in every case.
Remarks
The route is deliberately through the direct-sum and quotient universal properties rather than through a cocompleteness theorem for -modules: such a theorem says a colimit exists, and what is wanted here is the coequalizer itself, in a form in which an element of the coend can be named as a class of a finite sum.
At the generator is , so identity morphisms enlarge by nothing; and if is discrete there are no non-identity morphisms at all, is the zero submodule and the coend is the direct sum of the diagonal values.
Depends on
- The end and the coend of a functor $\mathcal C^{\mathrm{op}}\times\mathcal C\to\mathcal D$
- Wedges and cowedges, and the categories they form
- The direct sum of an indexed family of modules
- Universal property of a direct sum of modules
- Quotient module $M/N$ with scalar multiplication on additive cosets
- A module homomorphism vanishing on $N$ factors uniquely through $M/N$
- Submodule of a module
- Left modules over a fixed ring and module homomorphisms form the large locally small category $R\text{-}\mathbf{Mod}$
- Small, locally small, and large categories
- Generated submodule, cyclic and finitely generated modules, module basis and free module
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
27 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- B. Richter, From Categories to Homotopy Theory (author's draft), Example 4.4.7 (standard reference, not scraped)