How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
A set-valued coend is the disjoint union of the diagonal values modulo the dinaturality relation
Statement
Let be a small category (Small, locally small, and large categories) and let be a functor (Sets and functions form the large locally small category ). Write
for the disjoint union of the diagonal values, and let be the least equivalence relation on it (Equivalence relation, equivalence class, and the quotient set ) containing
Then has a coend, and it is the disjoint union of the diagonal values modulo the dinaturality relation (The end and the coend of a functor ):
Both generating elements are named with their summands: the pair is generated by an element of the off-diagonal value , pushed into the summand at by and into the summand at by .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A small category and a functor .
Sets as objects and functions as morphisms form a large locally small category (Sets and functions form the large locally small category ).
A category is small when both and are sets. (Small, locally small, and large categories).
Every small diagram has a colimit; it is the quotient of the tagged union by the least equivalence relation containing for (Set has all small colimits, realized as a quotient of a set-indexed disjoint union).
The coproduct of an indexed family regarded as a diagram on the discrete category is its colimit, with injections through which every family factors by a unique copairing (Products and coproducts as limits and colimits of discrete diagrams, including their existence-and-uniqueness equations).
For a small whose displayed coproducts exist, a coend is the coequalizer of two maps between coproducts, namely of the two morphisms determined on the -summand by into the summand at and by into the summand at , the -summand being (An end is the equalizer of two products, and a coend the coequalizer of two coproducts).
A coequalizer of is a morphism satisfying such that, whenever satisfies , there is a unique with (Equalizers and coequalizers as limits and colimits of a parallel pair).
A binary relation on is an equivalence relation when it is reflexive on , symmetric and transitive; the quotient set is the set of equivalence classes and the quotient map is surjective (Equivalence relation, equivalence class, and the quotient set ).
An end of is a terminal object of the category of wedges over and a coend an initial object of the category of cowedges under ; in short, an end is a terminal wedge and a coend an initial cowedge (The end and the coend of a functor ).
Proof
Since is small, the objects and the morphisms of form sets, so both families in question are set-indexed. A coproduct is a colimit of a discrete diagram, and on a discrete index category the only morphisms are identities, so the least equivalence relation of [L2] is equality and the colimit is the tagged union itself. Hence and exist in and are the displayed disjoint unions.
By [L1] the coend of is the coequalizer, if it exists, of the two functions given on the summand at by and , where ranges over .
The quotient map coequalises and , because every pair is one of the generating pairs of . If is a function on with , then is an equivalence relation containing every generating pair, so it contains ; hence is constant on classes and factors as for a unique , uniqueness because is surjective. So is a coequalizer of and .
Therefore the coequalizer of step 2.1 exists, and by [L1] and [F3] the coend of is the quotient set of step 3.1, with the initial cowedge given by .
Remarks
The source of a generating pair is the off-diagonal value , indexed by running the other way; this is the same swap that appears in the description of a coend as a colimit over (An end is a limit over the twisted arrow category, and a coend is a colimit over its opposite). If is empty for some pair, that summand contributes no generating pair at all, and the corresponding identifications simply do not happen.
Identity morphisms contribute nothing: at both are the identity of and the generating pair is , which every equivalence relation contains already.
Depends on
- An end is the equalizer of two products, and a coend the coequalizer of two coproducts
- The end and the coend of a functor $\mathcal C^{\mathrm{op}}\times\mathcal C\to\mathcal D$
- Set has all small colimits, realized as a quotient of a set-indexed disjoint union
- Sets and functions form the large locally small category $\mathbf{Set}$
- Equivalence relation, equivalence class, and the quotient set $A/{\sim}$
- Small, locally small, and large categories
- Products and coproducts as limits and colimits of discrete diagrams, including their existence-and-uniqueness equations
- Equalizers and coequalizers as limits and colimits of a parallel pair
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
26 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- F. Loregian, (Co)end Calculus (arXiv:1501.02503v7), Remark 1.2.4 (standard reference, not scraped)
- E. Riehl, Categorical Homotopy Theory, (7.1.6) (standard reference, not scraped)