How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Products and coproducts as limits and colimits of discrete diagrams, including their existence-and-uniqueness equations
Definition
Let be an indexed family of objects (An indexed family is a function with domain ; is its range), regarded as a diagram on the discrete category . Its product is its limit (Limits and colimits as terminal cones and initial cocones, with existence and uniqueness in their universal properties): an object with projections such that every family has a unique pairing
Its coproduct is its colimit: an object with injections such that every family has a unique copairing
The empty product is therefore terminal and the empty coproduct initial. A one-object product or coproduct is canonically the object itself. A product or coproduct need not exist.
Depends on
Used by
- A limit in a full subcategory need not be the ambient limit Counterexample
- A reflexive coequalizer of sets not preserved by Set(ℕ,-) Counterexample
- Assuming Choice, nonempty sets have all small products but a parallel pair with no equalizer and hence a diagram with no limit Counterexample
- Filtered colimits in Set need not commute with countably infinite products Counterexample
- Canonical morphism from a finite coproduct to a finite product Definition
- Direct sum total complex of a double complex Definition
- Exponential object Definition
- Product total complex of a double complex Definition
- Products of classical algebraic sets and their universal property Definition
- In a poset regarded as a category, products are infima, coproducts are suprema, and equalizers are automatic Example
- Products in Set are Cartesian products and coproducts are tagged disjoint unions Example
- Under the definable-class diagram convention, the empty set is the product of the large family of all sets Example
- FALSE: every functor on CᵒᵖtimesC has an end False statement
- FALSE: every functor preserves the ends that exist in its domain False statement
- Associator, symmetry and unitors of the abelian sheaf tensor product Lemma
- Countable sequence groups and tail filtrations Lemma
- The total differential squares to zero Lemma
- A poset category is complete exactly when every small family has an infimum, and cocomplete exactly when every small family has a supremum Proposition
- Biproducts are associative, commutative, and unital up to canonical isomorphism Proposition
- Products and coproducts of complexes are degreewise when they exist and preserve differentials Proposition
- Sum and product totalisations agree on finite diagonal double complexes Proposition
- A cartesian closed preorder has relative implications Theorem
- A category with finite products is monoidal Theorem
- A power by a set is the product of that many copies and a copower is the coproduct Theorem
- A set-valued coend is the disjoint union of the diagonal values modulo the dinaturality relation Theorem
- An end is the equalizer of two products, and a coend the coequalizer of two coproducts Theorem
- Assuming Choice, a small category with products or coproducts indexed by the cardinality of its morphism set is a preorder Theorem
- Biproduct data characterisation without addition Theorem
- Every small colimit can be constructed as a coequalizer between coproducts over the arrows and objects of the index category Theorem
- Every small limit can be constructed as an equalizer between products over the objects and arrows of the index category Theorem
- Finite, nonempty finite, and connected finite (co)limit criteria in terms of products, equalizers, pullbacks, terminal objects, and their duals Theorem
Dependency tree · two levels
6 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- E. Riehl, Category Theory in Context, Definitions 3.1.9 and 3.1.13 (standard reference, not scraped)