Alphabeta Math
PropositionStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-08-30
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Products and coproducts of complexes are degreewise when they exist and preserve differentials

Statement

Let (C∙(i))i∈I be a family of chain complexes in an abelian category where the termwise products or coproducts exist.

  1. If every ∏iCn(i) exists, then these products form a chain complex with differential characterized by the component differentials, and it is the product of the family in Ch⁡(A).
  2. If every ∐iCn(i) exists, then these coproducts form a chain complex with differential characterized by the component differentials, and it is the coproduct of the family in Ch⁡(A).

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A family of chain complexes (C∙(i))i∈I in an abelian category.

[L1]

A chain complex is a graded family with dn−1dn=0 (Chain complex in an abelian category).

Proof

technique · constructive
1.1L1L2givenconstruct

Suppose the products exist. For each degree n, let Pn:=∏iCn(i). By [L2] there is a unique map dnP:Pn→Pn−1 such that for every i, πin−1dnP=dn(i)πin, where πin:Pn→Cn(i) is the ith projection. Then πin−2dn−1PdnP=dn−1(i)dn(i)πin=0 by [L1], so dn−1PdnP=0 because all projections of that composite are zero. Thus P∙ is a chain complex and has the required product universal property degreewise.

2.1L1L2givenconstructdischarge-construct∎

The coproduct case is dual. If Qn:=∐iCn(i) exists in each degree, [L2] gives a unique dnQ:Qn→Qn−1 such that for every i, dnQιin=ιin−1dn(i), where ιin:Cn(i)→Qn is the ith coproduct injection. By [L1], dn−1QdnQιin=dn−1Qιin−1dn(i)=ιin−2dn−1(i)dn(i)=0, so dn−1QdnQ=0 because its composites with every injection vanish. Hence Q∙ is the coproduct complex.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

5 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources