How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
An additive functor applies degreewise to complexes and chain maps
Statement
Let be an additive functor between abelian categories. Applying degreewise to a chain complex and to a chain map produces a chain complex and a chain map .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: An additive functor between abelian categories.
Additive functors preserve zero morphisms (An additive functor preserves zero morphisms).
A chain complex satisfies (Chain complex in an abelian category).
A chain map commutes with differentials (Chain map).
Proof
If is a chain complex, then by [L1] and [L2]. Hence the objects with differentials form a chain complex.
If is a chain map, then [L3] gives . Applying yields so the family is a chain map .
Depends on
Used by
- FALSE: an additive functor commutes with homology False statement
- An exact functor commutes with homology Theorem
Dependency tree · two levels
7 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Charles A. Weibel, Chapter 1 of An Introduction to Homological Algebra (standard reference, not scraped)
- The Stacks Project, Section 12.7: Additive functors (standard reference, not scraped)