TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-04

How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Right derived functors relative to supplied data are additive functors

Statement

Assume the Axiom of Dependent Choice.

Let $I$ be a supplied injective resolution datum and $F : A \to B$ an additive functor between abelian categories. For every $n \in Z$ , the assignments $A ⟼ R_{I}^{n} F (A), u ⟼ R_{I}^{n} F (u)$ define an additive functor on the domain of $I$ .

Facts & Assumptions

Given: An integer $n$ .

[L1]

Right derived maps are defined from injective comparison extensions (The right derived map relative to supplied resolution data).

[L2]

The cochain comparison-extension construction is available for every morphism, and its induced cohomology map is independent of the chosen extension (A morphism has a comparison extension between the supplied injective resolutions, The induced cohomology map is independent of the chosen injective comparison extension).

[L3]

A cochain complex may be reindexed as a chain complex (Cochain complex in an abelian category).

[L4]

The category of complexes in an additive category is additive, and additive functors apply degreewise to chain maps (The category of complexes in an additive category is additive, An additive functor applies degreewise to complexes and chain maps).

[L5]

Two injective comparison extensions of the same morphism are cochain-homotopic, and after reindexing chain-homotopic maps induce the same map on homology (Injective comparison maps are unique up to cochain homotopy, Chain-homotopic maps induce the same map on homology).

[L6]

An additive functor is a functor that is additive on each hom-group (Additive functor).

Proof

technique · direct

1.1

Identity and composition are proved exactly as on the projective side: choose comparison extensions for the relevant morphisms, compare the extension of a composite or identity with the obvious chain-level candidate, and use [L5] after reindexing by [L3]. Therefore the assignments in [L1] form a functor.

L1L2L3L5givenalgebra

1.2

Let $u, v : A \to B$ . Choose comparison extensions ${\tilde{u}}^{∙}$ and ${\tilde{v}}^{∙}$ . By [L4], their degreewise sum is a cochain map and extends $u + v$ , so it is a comparison extension of $u + v$ .

L2L4construct

2.1

Reindexing by [L3], applying $F$ degreewise by [L4], and using homotopy invariance from [L5], the induced cohomology map of ${\tilde{u}}^{∙} + {\tilde{v}}^{∙}$ equals the sum of the induced cohomology maps of ${\tilde{u}}^{∙}$ and ${\tilde{v}}^{∙}$ . Hence $R_{I}^{n} F (u + v) = R_{I}^{n} F (u) + R_{I}^{n} F (v) .$

L3L4L5step 1.2algebra

3.1

Steps 1.1 and 2.1 give the functoriality and hom-group additivity required by [L6]. Therefore $R_{I}^{n} F$ is an additive functor.

L6step 1.1step 2.1∎

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

24 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources

Charles A. Weibel, An Introduction to Homological Algebra, Chapter 2 `Derived Functors` (standard reference, not scraped)