How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Chain-homotopic maps induce the same map on homology
Statement
If are chain-homotopic chain maps, then for every ,
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A chain homotopy and an integer .
A chain homotopy satisfies (A chain homotopy).
The cycle inclusion is the kernel of , hence . The boundary inclusion is the image of (Cycle and boundary subobjects of a complex).
The boundary inclusion factors through the cycle inclusion . Thus there are arrows and with (The boundary subobject factors through the cycle subobject).
The homology quotients and are cokernels of the respective boundary-to-cycle maps; in particular (Homology object of a chain complex).
For a chain map , its cycle map satisfies (A chain map carries cycles to cycles and boundaries to boundaries), and its induced homology map is characterized by (A chain map induces a well-defined map on homology).
A cokernel is a coequalizer and therefore an epimorphism: two arrows agreeing after precomposition with are equal (Kernels and cokernels in a category with zero morphisms as equalizers and coequalizers).
Proof
Restrict the homotopy identity [L1] along . Since by [L2], By [L5], the left side is . The kernel inclusion is monic, so
Apply to the equality in step 1.1. Since by [L4], By [L5], this is . The cokernel map is epic by [L6], so for every .
Depends on
- A chain homotopy
- Cycle and boundary subobjects of a complex
- The boundary subobject factors through the cycle subobject
- Homology object of a chain complex
- Kernels and cokernels in a category with zero morphisms as equalizers and coequalizers
- A chain map carries cycles to cycles and boundaries to boundaries
- A chain map induces a well-defined map on homology
Used by
- Homotopic maps induce the same map on singular homology Corollary
- Null-homotopic maps induce zero on homology Corollary
- Smoothly homotopic maps induce the same de rham map Corollary
- Two homotopic maps with different components Example
- Double bar comparison for cyclic bimodule tensor products Lemma
- Objectwise comparison of two projective resolution data induces an isomorphism on derived objects Lemma
- Pushforward along a closed immersion preserves sheaf cohomology Lemma
- The change-of-projective-resolution isomorphisms are natural Lemma
- The induced cohomology map is independent of the chosen injective comparison extension Lemma
- The induced homology map is independent of the chosen comparison lift Lemma
- The left derived connecting map is independent of the horseshoe resolution and lifts Lemma
- Variance of sheaf cohomology Lemma
- Change-of-injective-resolution isomorphisms satisfy identity and cocycle laws Proposition
- Change-of-projective-resolution isomorphisms satisfy identity and cocycle laws Proposition
- Left derived maps preserve composition Proposition
- A chain homotopy equivalence is a quasi-isomorphism Theorem
- Cohomology of a finite disjoint union Theorem
- Contiguous simplicial maps induce the same map on simplicial homology Theorem
- Derived cyclicity of Hochschild hyperhomology Theorem
- Hochschild hyperhomology is independent of a projective resolution Theorem
- Homology factors uniquely through the homotopy category Theorem
- Homotopic continuation data give chain homotopic maps Theorem
- Left derived functors relative to supplied data are additive functors Theorem
- Polynomial Hochschild homology from the diagonal Koszul complex Theorem
- Refinement choices induce the same Čech map Theorem
- Right derived functors relative to supplied data are additive functors Theorem
- Simplicial subdivision is a chain map and homology isomorphism Theorem
- Termwise Hochschild cyclicity for bounded projective bimodule complexes Theorem
- Termwise Hochschild homology respects bimodule chain homotopies Theorem
- Two supplied injective resolution data define naturally isomorphic right derived functors Theorem
Dependency tree · two levels
16 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Charles A. Weibel, Chapter 1 of An Introduction to Homological Algebra (standard reference, not scraped)
- Joseph J. Rotman, An Introduction to Homological Algebra, 2nd ed. (standard reference, not scraped)