How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Cycle and boundary subobjects of a complex
Definition
Let be a chain complex in an abelian category and fix .
The th cycle subobject of is
The th boundary subobject of is
Thus both are subobjects of , one defined by the kernel of and the other by the image of .
Depends on
Used by
- Exactness of a complex at a degree and acyclic complexes Definition
- Homology object of a chain complex Definition
- A two-term complex has kernel and cokernel homology Example
- FALSE: the boundaries of a complex are a quotient of its cycles False statement
- A chain map carries cycles to cycles and boundaries to boundaries Lemma
- The boundary subobject factors through the cycle subobject Lemma
Dependency tree · two levels
6 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Charles A. Weibel, Chapter 1 of An Introduction to Homological Algebra (standard reference, not scraped)
- The Stacks Project, Section 12.13: Complexes (standard reference, not scraped)