Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedjudge pass (gpt-6.1-sol)audited 2026-10-02
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Termwise Hochschild cyclicity for bounded projective bimodule complexes

Statement

Assume the Axiom of Choice (AC). Let k be a field, let A and B be unital associative k-algebras, let M be a bounded cochain complex of graded (A,B)-bimodules with termwise finite projective right B-terms, and let N be a bounded cochain complex of graded (B,A)-bimodules with termwise finite projective right A-terms; all differentials have internal degree zero (Bounded graded bimodule complexes and signed tensor totalization). Then for every Hochschild degree j≥0, every cochain degree r and every internal degree there is a natural isomorphism Hr(HHj(A,Tot⁡(M⊗BN)))  ≅  Hr(HHj(B,Tot⁡(N⊗AM))), where the termwise Hochschild complexes are those of Termwise Hochschild homology and iterated homology. The isomorphism is induced, termwise over the pairs (Mi,Nl), by the double-bar rotation of Double bar comparison for cyclic bimodule tensor products, multiplied on the (i,l)-summand by the Koszul sign (−1)il; the twisted map is a cochain isomorphism before cohomology is taken, and the reverse rotation gives its inverse. This is an iterated-homology statement in its own right and is not inferred from an abutment of any hyperhomology spectral sequence.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: AC, a field k, unital associative k-algebras A and B, a bounded cochain complex M of graded (A,B)-bimodules with termwise finite projective right B-terms, and a bounded cochain complex N of graded (B,A)-bimodules with termwise finite projective right A-terms, all differentials of internal degree zero.

[F1]

For each j≥0 the termwise Hochschild complex HHj(A,−) is obtained by applying the Hochschild complex functor C∙(A,−) degreewise to the coefficient complex and passing to homology; a bimodule map u induces a chain map C∙(A,u) commuting with every Hochschild face, and the induced maps on homology assemble into the cochain differential of the termwise complex, whose cohomology is Hi(HHj(A,F∙)) (Hochschild chains and Hochschild homology with coefficients, Termwise Hochschild homology and iterated homology).

[F2]

Assume AC. For a fixed (A,B)-bimodule M′ finite projective as a right B-module and a fixed (B,A)-bimodule N′ finite projective as a right A-module, there is a natural zigzag of chain-homotopy equivalences C∙(A,M′⊗BN′)≃C∙(B,N′⊗AM′); it is realized through the double-bar resolutions and their cyclic rotation, and it is natural and involutive up to homotopy (Double bar comparison for cyclic bimodule tensor products).

[F3]

The signed tensor totalization has Tot⁡(M⊗BN)r=⨁i+l=rMi⊗BNl with differential d(m⊗n)=dMm⊗n+(−1)im⊗dNn on the summand of cochain degree i; each total degree is a finite direct sum because M and N are bounded, and the differentials and the Koszul signs are as in Bounded graded bimodule complexes and signed tensor totalization.

[F4]

Tensoring with a bimodule complex is additive and preserves chain maps, composition and chain homotopies: on a summand of cochain degree i the second-factor homotopy enters with sign (−1)i and the first-factor homotopy enters with no extra sign (Bimodule tensor totalization respects differentials and homotopies).

[F5]

A chain map induces the unique map on homology represented by its restriction to cycles followed by the homology quotient; the uniqueness clause makes this assignment preserve identities and compositions, and the cycle-quotient description preserves sums of chain maps (A chain map induces a well-defined map on homology).

[F6]

Since Cj(A,M)=M⊗kA⊗kj is built from the tensor product, which is linear in its coefficient variable, the Hochschild complex functor C∙(A,−) is additive: a finite direct sum of coefficient bimodules satisfies Cj(A,F⊕G)≅Cj(A,F)⊕Cj(A,G) naturally, and Cj(A,u+v)=Cj(A,u)+Cj(A,v). Thus the induced maps on homology are additive by [F5]. For a finite direct sum of coefficient complexes, the termwise complexes and their cohomology are the direct sums of the summands; kernels and images in the definition of cohomology commute with finite direct sums (Hochschild chains and Hochschild homology with coefficients, Cohomology object of a cochain complex).

[F7]

Chain-homotopic maps induce the same map on homology; applying this in each Hochschild degree gives invariance of HHj under the chain-homotopy equivalences in [F2] (Chain-homotopic maps induce the same map on homology).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1F2F5F7givenalgebra

Fix cochain degrees (i,l). By the termwise right-projectivity hypotheses and [F2], the double-bar comparison gives a zigzag of chain-homotopy equivalences between the Hochschild complexes with coefficients Mi⊗BNl and Nl⊗AMi. By [F7], this induces an isomorphism ρi,l:HHj(A,Mi⊗BNl)→HHj(B,Nl⊗AMi) for each j, natural with respect to bimodule maps and inverted by the reverse rotation.

2.1F3F4step 1.1givenalgebra

On the (i,l) summand define Fi,l=(−1)ilρi,l. The source tensor differential has components δM=dM⊗1 and δN=(−1)i(1⊗dN); the target has components dN and (−1)ldM. Naturality of ρ gives ρi+1,lδM=dMρi,l and ρi,l+1(1⊗dN)=dNρi,l. Therefore Fi+1,lδM=(−1)(i+1)ldMρi,l=(−1)ldMFi,l, matching the target M-component, and Fi,l+1δN=(−1)i(l+1)(−1)idNρi,l=(−1)ildNρi,l=dNFi,l, matching the target N-component. Thus the twist is a cochain map with both signs explicitly checked.

3.1F2F3F4F6step 1.1step 2.1givenalgebra

For fixed j, the finite direct-sum decomposition of each total degree in [F3] lets the maps Fi,l assemble into a cochain isomorphism HHj(A,Tot⁡(M⊗BN))→HHj(B,Tot⁡(N⊗AM)). The additivity and finite-direct-sum cohomology property [F6] ensure that applying HHj to each finite diagonal and taking its cohomology gives the asserted assembled map. Each reverse component is Fi,l−1, because ρi,l−1 is the reverse rotation and (−1)il is its own inverse. The complexes are bounded, so every cochain-degree diagonal is finite.

4.1F1F5step 3.1givenalgebra∎

Taking cohomology of the cochain isomorphism in 3.1 gives the natural isomorphism Hr(HHj(A,Tot⁡(M⊗BN)))≅Hr(HHj(B,Tot⁡(N⊗AM))) for every j,r and internal degree. Every map preserves internal degree, and the proof is termwise before cohomology, independent of any hyperhomology spectral-sequence abutment.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

43 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources