How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Termwise Hochschild homology respects bimodule chain homotopies
Statement
Let be a field, let be a unital associative -algebra, and let and be bounded cochain complexes of -central -bimodules with differentials of internal degree zero (Bounded graded bimodule complexes and signed tensor totalization). Let be bimodule-linear cochain maps of cochain degree zero and let be a bimodule-linear cochain homotopy of cochain degree with on (A chain homotopy).
Then for every the induced maps on the termwise Hochschild complexes of Termwise Hochschild homology and iterated homology are cochain-homotopic; the homotopy is induced by , and hence and induce the same map for every (Cohomology object of a cochain complex). Consequently a bimodule chain-homotopy equivalence induces isomorphisms for all . Everything here is choice-free, and no invariance of the termwise groups under arbitrary quasi-isomorphisms is asserted.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: a field , a unital associative -algebra , bounded cochain complexes of -central -bimodules with internal-degree-zero differentials, bimodule-linear cochain maps of cochain degree zero, and a bimodule-linear cochain homotopy of cochain degree with .
The Hochschild chain complex of a -central bimodule has with boundary the alternating sum of faces; the termwise complex of a bounded complex in Hochschild degree is with differentials induced by the bimodule maps , and its cohomology is (Hochschild chains and Hochschild homology with coefficients, Termwise Hochschild homology and iterated homology).
is the homology of the Hochschild chain complex, and a chain map induces a well-defined map (A chain map induces a well-defined map on homology).
A chain homotopy between chain maps of chain complexes satisfies in each degree; homotopic chain maps induce the same map on homology (A chain homotopy).
A map of -central -bimodules commutes with every Hochschild face, since the faces multiply the coefficient by algebra elements on either side; hence a bimodule map induces a chain map natural in the bimodule (Hochschild chains and Hochschild homology with coefficients, Enveloping algebra and the bimodule–module dictionary).
For fixed and composable bimodule maps the assignment is additive: , because the tensor product of a map with an identity is linear in the map; it also preserves identities and composition, so is additive on maps (Hochschild chains and Hochschild homology with coefficients).
Chain-homotopic maps induce the same map on homology; after reindexing cochain degree as homological degree , homotopic cochain maps induce the same map on cohomology (Chain-homotopic maps induce the same map on homology).
Proof
Fix . For each the bimodule map commutes with every Hochschild face by [F4], so it induces a chain map , and hence a map on homology by [F2]. The same applies to , , and ; the homotopy has cochain degree , so is a degree- family of maps of Hochschild complexes.
Because is additive on maps by [F5], applying it to the homotopy identity gives exactly . Passing to homology with [F2], this is the displayed homotopy identity in Hochschild degree , valid in every cochain degree; the family has cochain degree and is a cochain homotopy of the termwise complexes by [F3].
Applying [F6] in each cochain degree , the cochain-homotopic maps and induce the same map on the cohomology of the termwise complex, and the induced map depends only on the cochain-homotopy class of the map of coefficient complexes. Everything in the argument is a computation of maps of -vector spaces, so no choice is used, and no statement about arbitrary quasi-isomorphisms is made. In the graded case the statement is ungraded unless are also internal-degree-zero; under that extra condition the induced homotopy and maps preserve internal degree.
Now let be a bimodule chain-homotopy equivalence, with bimodule-linear homotopy inverse of cochain degree zero and two bimodule-linear homotopies and of cochain degree . By 2.1 and functoriality, the induced maps on compose to the identity in both orders, so they are inverse isomorphisms for every .
Depends on
- Termwise Hochschild homology and iterated homology
- A chain homotopy
- A chain map induces a well-defined map on homology
- Hochschild chains and Hochschild homology with coefficients
- Cohomology object of a cochain complex
- Enveloping algebra and the bimodule–module dictionary
- Bounded graded bimodule complexes and signed tensor totalization
- Chain-homotopic maps induce the same map on homology
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
28 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Beliakova–Putyra–Wehrli, Quantum Link Homology via Trace Functor I, §3.8.6, printed p.38 (standard reference, not scraped)
- Charles A. Weibel, An Introduction to Homological Algebra, Chapter 9, §9.1, printed pp.300–304 (standard reference, not scraped)
- Charles A. Weibel, An Introduction to Homological Algebra, Chapter 1, §1.4, Lemma 1.4.5, printed p.17 (standard reference, not scraped)