Alphabeta Math
PropositionStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-generatedprecheck passaudited 2026-08-30
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Finite biproducts of complexes are computed degreewise

Statement

Let A be an abelian category. Finite biproducts in Ch⁡(A) are formed degreewise. In particular, Hn(C∙⊕D∙)≅Hn(C∙)⊕Hn(D∙) for every n.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: An abelian category A and chain complexes C∙ and D∙ in A.

[L1]

Ch⁡(A) is additive, so it has finite biproducts (The category of complexes in an additive category is additive).

[L2]

Homology is an additive functor (Homology is an additive functor).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1L1

The proof of [L1] constructs the biproduct C∙⊕D∙ degreewise, with term Cn⊕Dn and differential dnC⊕dnD. Thus finite biproducts of complexes are formed degreewise.

2.1L2step 1.1∎

Since Hn is additive by [L2], it preserves finite biproducts. Applying it to the biproduct from step 1.1 gives Hn(C∙⊕D∙)≅Hn(C∙)⊕Hn(D∙).

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

10 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources