How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Finite biproducts of complexes are computed degreewise
Statement
Let be an abelian category. Finite biproducts in are formed degreewise. In particular, for every .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: An abelian category and chain complexes and in .
is additive, so it has finite biproducts (The category of complexes in an additive category is additive).
Homology is an additive functor (Homology is an additive functor).
Proof
The proof of [L1] constructs the biproduct degreewise, with term and differential . Thus finite biproducts of complexes are formed degreewise.
Since is additive by [L2], it preserves finite biproducts. Applying it to the biproduct from step 1.1 gives
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
10 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Charles A. Weibel, Chapter 1 of An Introduction to Homological Algebra (standard reference, not scraped)