How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Homology is an additive functor
Statement
For each , homology defines an additive functor
Facts & Assumptions
Given: An abelian category and an integer .
A chain map induces a map on homology (A chain map induces a well-defined map on homology).
Those induced maps respect identities and composition (Homology respects identities and composition).
An additive functor is a functor that is additive on each hom-group (Additive functor).
An abelian category is additive, so is also additive and sums of chain maps are defined degreewise (Abelian category, The category of complexes in an additive category is additive).
Kernels are universal among arrows annihilated by the displayed map (Kernels and cokernels in a category with zero morphisms as equalizers and coequalizers).
Proof
By [L1] and [L2], the assignment and is already a functor.
Let be chain maps. By [L4], their sum is the chain map with components . Let be the cycle inclusions and the homology quotients. Then Since both maps on cycles are killed by , the uniqueness in the kernel property [L5] for gives Therefore By the uniqueness clause in [L1], this forces
Steps 1.1 and 1.2 are exactly the functoriality and additivity demanded by [L3]. Hence is an additive functor.
Depends on
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
17 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- The Stacks Project, Section 12.13: Complexes (standard reference, not scraped)
- Charles A. Weibel, Chapter 1 of An Introduction to Homological Algebra (standard reference, not scraped)