How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Homology respects identities and composition
Statement
For every :
- for every chain complex .
- If and are chain maps, then
Facts & Assumptions
Given: Chain maps and .
Identities and composites of chain maps are chain maps (Identities and composites of chain maps are chain maps).
A chain map induces a unique map on homology compatible with the quotient from cycles (A chain map induces a well-defined map on homology).
Proof
By [L1], is a chain map. The identity on satisfies the same compatibility with the quotient from cycles as the map from [L2], so uniqueness in [L2] gives .
Again by [L1], is a chain map. Both and compose with the cycle quotient to the map induced by the composite on cycles, so [L2] forces them to agree.
Depends on
Used by
- Isomorphisms of complexes are quasi-isomorphisms Proposition
- Homology is an additive functor Theorem
Dependency tree · two levels
6 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Charles A. Weibel, Chapter 1 of An Introduction to Homological Algebra (standard reference, not scraped)
- The Stacks Project, Section 12.13: Complexes (standard reference, not scraped)