How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
The full subcategory of acyclic complexes is thick in the homotopy category
Statement
For an abelian category , the full subcategory of consisting of acyclic complexes is thick.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: An abelian category and the class of acyclic complexes in its homotopy category.
Proof
A cone long exact sequence and the shift identification show that acyclicity is stable under shifts and satisfies two-out-of-three for cone triangles.
Homology takes a retract of a complex to a retract of its homology, and degreewise finite biproducts preserve acyclicity; hence the class is closed under direct summands and is thick.
Depends on
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
21 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- The Stacks Project, Derived Categories, Section 13.10 (standard reference, not scraped)