Alphabeta Math
CounterexampleConstruction: Literature-sourcedVerification: AI-adaptedprecheck passaudited 2026-08-13
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Filtered colimits in Set need not commute with countably infinite products

Statement refuted

Filtered colimits in Set commute with arbitrary set-indexed products.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Positive integers i,j and sets Mi,j={1,…,i}, with inclusions as i increases.

[F1]

A category is filtered when it is nonempty, every two objects have a common target, and every parallel pair is equalized at a later stage (Filtered categories and filtered colimits).

[L1]

Filtered colimits commute with finite, not asserted infinite, limits in Set (Filtered colimits commute with finite limits in Set).

Counterexample

technique · bounded sequences
1.1F1F2

The positive-integer chain is nonempty, two indices have their maximum as a common target, and it has no distinct parallel arrows, so it is filtered by [F1]. For fixed i, the countable product ∏j≥1Mi,j is the set of positive-integer sequences all of whose entries are at most i.

1.2F2

For each j, the filtered colimit colim⁡iMi,j is N>0. The product of these coordinatewise colimits is the set of all positive-integer sequences, including (1,2,3,…), which is unbounded.

2.1step 1.1

Its filtered colimit over i is therefore the set of bounded positive-integer sequences: a sequence appears at some stage exactly when one integer bounds all its coordinates.

3.1L1step 2.1step 1.2∎

Hence the canonical map from step 2.1 to the set in step 1.2 is not surjective. The arbitrary-product assertion is false, while [L1] is not contradicted because the product is infinite.

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · two levels

12 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources