How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
A reflexive coequalizer of sets not preserved by
Statement refuted
The covariant representable functor need not preserve reflexive coequalizers. There is a reflexive coequalizer of sets whose image under this functor is not a coequalizer.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The successor map on and the coproduct with injections .
A reflexive pair has a common section satisfying (Reflexive parallel pairs and reflexive coequalizers).
A coequalizer universally identifies the two maps of a parallel pair (Equalizers and coequalizers as limits and colimits of a parallel pair).
The functions form the set (The set of all functions ).
Counterexample
Define and . The second injection is a common section because , so the pair is reflexive by [L1].
The unique map is the coequalizer: the relation connects every natural to , and any map coequalizing is therefore constant and factors uniquely through .
Applying gives a pair . For a function , the two resulting sequences and differ at each coordinate by either or .
Every finite zigzag generated by pairs from step 2.2 has a uniform coordinatewise difference bound, namely its number of zigzag edges, by repeated use of the triangle inequality on natural-number differences.
The zero sequence and identity sequence have unbounded coordinatewise difference, so step 3.1 shows that no finite zigzag identifies them.
Both sequences map under to the unique element of , yet they remain distinct in the coequalizer of the image pair. Therefore is not the coequalizer required by [L2], and does not preserve this reflexive coequalizer.
Depends on
- Reflexive parallel pairs and reflexive coequalizers
- Equalizers and coequalizers as limits and colimits of a parallel pair
- The natural numbers $\mathbb{N}$ (von Neumann)
- Products and coproducts as limits and colimits of discrete diagrams, including their existence-and-uniqueness equations
- Sets and functions form the large locally small category $\mathbf{Set}$
- The set $B^{A}$ of all functions $A \to B$
- Covariant functor, identity functor, composite functor, and contravariant functor
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
20 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- J. Adámek, V. Koubek, and J. Velebil, A duality between infinitary varieties and algebraic theories, Definition 4.2 and Example 4.3 (standard reference, not scraped)