Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedSession-authored (Fable 5 assisted)precheck passaudited 2026-08-13 rests on unproved material (inherited)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Rests on 3 statements not proved in this library, by way of the results it cites. This item cites no such statement directly; it depends on results that do. The unproved premises it inherits are Cohen's first model: an infinite Dedekind-finite set of reals, Sierpiński 1947: the generalised continuum hypothesis implies the Axiom of Choice and The continuum hypothesis and its generalisation are independent of ZFC. Each is recorded with a citation to the literature and is not established here, because the track that would prove it has not yet been developed in this library. Everything else in this proof is proved here.

Every small limit can be constructed as an equalizer between products over the objects and arrows of the index category

Statement

Let D:JC be small. If the products

P=jObJD(j),Q=u:jkD(k)

and the equalizer of the maps s,t:PQ defined by qus=D(u)pj and qut=pk exist, then that equalizer is a limit of D.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The displayed products and an equalizer e:LP of s,t.

[F2]

An equalizer represents arrows on which its parallel pair agrees (Equalizers and coequalizers as limits and colimits of a parallel pair).

[F3]

Proof

technique · construction
1.1

By [F3] the two displayed families are set-indexed. By [F1], the stated coordinate equations define unique maps s,t:PQ.

F1F3
2.1

Put λj=pje. Since se=te, equality of the u-coordinates says D(u)λj=λk for every u:jk. Thus λ is a cone.

F2step 1.1
2.2

Given a cone ξj:XD(j), [F1] supplies a unique a:XP with pja=ξj. Its cone equations imply qusa=D(u)ξj=ξk=quta for all u, so product uniqueness gives sa=ta.

F1givenstep 1.1
3.1

By [F2], a factors uniquely as a=eh with h:XL. Then λjh=pjeh=ξj, so h is a cone morphism.

F2step 2.1step 2.2
4.1

If h has the same leg equations, product uniqueness gives eh=a=eh; equalizer uniqueness gives h=h.

F1F2step 3.1
5.1

Steps 2.1, 2.2, 3.1, and 4.1 are exactly [F4], so (L,λ) is a limit. If J is empty, both products are terminal objects, s=t, and their equalizer is isomorphic to the terminal object, so the construction still applies.

F1F2F4step 2.1step 3.1step 4.1

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · next 3 levels

Direct dependencies and their dependencies through the next three levels: 20 results over 8 levels. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, and this result sits at the bottom with a heavier outline. Click the chart to enlarge it.

Sources