How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Sum and product totalisations agree on finite diagonal double complexes
Statement
If each diagonal of a homological double complex in an abelian category contains only finitely many nonzero objects, both totalisations exist and the canonical comparison is an isomorphism of chain complexes.
Facts & Assumptions
Additive category supplies finite biproducts; Biproduct identifies the finite coproduct-to-product comparison as an isomorphism.
Products and coproducts as limits and colimits of discrete diagrams, including their existence-and-uniqueness equations supplies the universal properties of both constructions.
Direct sum total complex of a double complex specifies the differential on each injection; The total differential squares to zero proves its chain condition.
Product total complex of a double complex specifies the differential after each projection and verifies its chain condition.
Proof
Given: as stated. Write for the sum and product total objects, and for their structure maps whenever constructed.
Fix and let . A finite biproduct of the objects indexed by exists. Adjoining the unique maps from and to each omitted zero object makes its coproduct and product structures satisfy the universal properties for the whole diagonal: those omitted components impose no conditions on a family of maps. This constructs and , including , when both are zero.
Define by if and zero otherwise. Successive coproduct and product universal properties give its existence and uniqueness. Under the identifications in the preceding step it is precisely the finite biproduct comparison, so it is invertible. If has one element, it is the identity on that component.
Test and by precomposing with and postcomposing with . Both composites are for , for , and zero otherwise, by the two differential formulas. Universal-property uniqueness gives .
Multiplying this equation by the inverses gives . Hence the degreewise inverse is also a chain map. All components of the comparison are uniquely specified, and its inverses are unique; no simultaneous choice of lifts or representatives is involved. The conclusion holds for the zero complex and for a complex supported on one row or column as well.
Depends on
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
14 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Stacks Project, Section 12.18, finite diagonal totalisation (standard reference, not scraped)