How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
A category with finite products is monoidal
Statement
If a category has binary products and a terminal object, then is monoidal with tensor product and unit object any terminal object . Dually, if has binary coproducts and an initial object, then is monoidal with tensor product and unit object any initial object.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A category with binary products and a terminal object .
A binary product represents pairs of arrows into and , and a one-object product is canonically that object (Products and coproducts as limits and colimits of discrete diagrams, including their existence-and-uniqueness equations).
A terminal object receives a unique morphism from every object (Initial object, terminal object, and zero object).
A monoidal category needs a bifunctor on , natural isomorphisms , and the pentagon and triangle equations (Monoidal category).
Proof
Let and let the unit object be . On morphisms, define by the universal property of the binary product. Because product pairings are unique, identities and compositions are preserved componentwise, so is a bifunctor.
Let and be the canonical product projections. If is the unique map from [L2], then the inverse of is the pairing , and the inverse of is . Hence and are natural isomorphisms.
For objects , let be the unique arrow whose three composite projections are the obvious first, second, and third projections. Define similarly. By the same uniqueness argument, these arrows are inverse and natural.
Both sides of the pentagon are arrows from to . They have the same four composites with the terminally iterated product projections, so [L1] makes them equal. The same argument on the two projections from to and shows the triangle equation.
Therefore is a monoidal category. The coproduct statement is proved by the same construction with pairings replaced by copairings and terminal replaced by initial, using the dual clauses already present in Products and coproducts as limits and colimits of discrete diagrams, including their existence-and-uniqueness equations and Initial object, terminal object, and zero object.
Depends on
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
14 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- P. Etingof, S. Gelaki, D. Nikshych, and V. Ostrik, Tensor Categories, Chapter 2.3 (standard reference, not scraped)
- S. Mac Lane, Categories for the Working Mathematician, Chapter VII.1 (standard reference, not scraped)